Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1long as life lasts he reaches the world of Brahman/ — Here terminates the adhikara/za of ' up to death/ 13. On the attainment of this, there result the non-clinging and the destruction of later and earlier sins ; this being declared. Having, so far, elucidated the nature of meditation, the Sutras now begin to consider the result of meditation. Scripture declares that on the knowledge of Brahman being attained a man's later and earlier sins do not cling to him but pass away. ' As water does not cling to a lotus leaf, so no evil deed clings to him who knows this ' (Kh. Up. IV, 14, 3) ; ' Having known that he is not sullied by any evil deed ' (Brt. Up. IV, 4, 23) ; ' As the fibres of the Ishika reed when thrown into the fire are burnt, thus all his sins are burnt' (Kh. Up. V, 24, 3); 'All his works perish when He has been beheld who is high and low ' (Mu. Up. II, 2, 8). — The doubt here arises whether this non-clinging and destruction of all sins is possible as the result of mere meditation, or not. — It is not possible, the Purvapakshin maintains ; for Scripture declares, c no work the fruits of which have not been completely enjoyed perishes even in millions of aeons.' What the texts, quoted above, say as to the non-clinging and destruction of works occurs in sections complementary to passages inculcating knowledge as the means of final Release, and may therefore be understood as somehow meant to eulogize knowledge. Nor can it be said that knowledge is enjoined as an expiation of sins, so that the destruction of sins could be conceived as resulting from such expiation ; for knowledge — as we see from texts such as ' He who knows Brahman reaches the Highest,' ' He knows Brahman and he becomes Brahman' — is enjoined as a means to reach Brahman. The texts as to the non- clinging and destruction of sins therefore can only be viewed as arthavada passages supplementary to the texts enjoining knowledge of Brahman. — This view the Sutra sets aside. When a man reaches knowledge, the non- clinging and destruction of all sins may be effected through the power of knowledge. For Scripture declares the power IV ADHYAYA, I PADA, I 3. 723
2— This view the Sutra sets aside. When a man reaches knowledge, the non- clinging and destruction of all sins may be effected through the power of knowledge. For Scripture declares the power IV ADHYAYA, I PADA, I 3. 723 of knowledge to be such that * to him who knows this, no evil deed clings/ and so on. Nor is this in conflict with the text stating that no work not fully enjoyed perishes ; for this latter text aims at confirming the power of works to produce their results ; while the texts under discussion have for their aim to declare that knowledge when once sprung up possesses the power of destroying the capability of previously committed sins to produce their own evil results and the power of obstructing that capability on the part of future evil actions. The two sets of texts thus refer to different matters, and hence are not mutually con- tradictory. There is in fact no more contradiction between them than there is between the power of fire to produce heat and the power of water to subdue such heat. By knowledge effecting the non-clinging of sin we have to understand its obstructing the origination of the power, on the part of sin, to cause that disastrous disposition on the part of man which consists in unfitness for religious works ; for sins committed tend to render man unfit for religious works and inclined to commit further sinful actions of the same kind. By knowledge effecting the destruction of sin, on the other hand, we understand its destroying that power of sin after it has once originated. That power consists, funda- mentally, in displeasure on the part of the Lord. Know- ledge of the Lord, which, owing to the supreme dearness of its object is itself supremely dear, possesses the character- istic power of propitiating the Lord — the object of know- ledge— and thus destroys the displeasure of the Lord due to the previous commission of sins on the part of the knowing Devotee ; and at the same time obstructs the origination of further displeasure on the Lord's part, which otherwise would be caused by sins committed subsequently to the origination of such knowledge. What Scripture says about sin not clinging to him who knows can however be understood only with regard to such sins as spring from thoughtlessness ; for texts such as ' he who has not turned away from evil conduct ' (Ka. Up. I, 2, 24) teach that medi- tation, becoming more perfect day after day, cannot be accomplished without the Devotee having previously broken 3 A2 724 VEDANTA-SUTRAS. himself off from all evil conduct. — Here terminates the adhikara/za of ' the reaching of that.' 14. Of the other also there is thus non-clinging; but at death.
3himself off from all evil conduct. — Here terminates the adhikara/za of ' the reaching of that.' 14. Of the other also there is thus non-clinging; but at death. It has been said that, owing to knowledge, earlier and subsequent sins do not cling and are destroyed. The same holds good also with regard to the other, i. e. to good works — they also, owing to knowledge, do not cling and are destroyed ; for there is the same antagonism between knowledge and the fruit of those works, and Scripture moreover expressly declares this. Thus we read, ' Day and night do not pass that bank — neither good nor evil deeds. All sins turn back from it' (Kk. Up. VIII, 4, 1); c He shakes off his good and evil deeds ' (Kau. Up. I, 4). In the former of these texts good works are expressly designated as 'sin' because their fruits also are some- thing not desirable for him who aims at Release ; there is some reason for doing this because after all good works are enjoined by Scripture and their fruits are desired by men, and they hence might be thought not to be opposed to know- ledge.— But even to him who possesses the knowledge of Brahman, the fruits of good deeds — such as seasonable rain, good crops, &c.— are desirable because they enable him to perform his meditations in due form ; how then can it be said that knowledge is antagonistic to them and destroys them ? — Of this point the Sutra disposes by means of the clause ' but on death/ Good works which produce results favourable to knowledge and meditation perish only on the death of the body (not during the lifetime of the Devotee). — Here terminates the adhikara^a of ' the other/ 15. But only those former works the effects of which have not yet begun ; on account of that being the term. A new doubt prises here, viz. whether all previous good and evil works are destroyed by the Origination of know- ledge, or only those the effects of which have not yet begun to operate. — All wrorks alike, the Purvapakshin says ; for the texts — as e. g. ' all sins are burned ' — declare the fruits IV ADHYAYA, I PAD A, 1 6. 725 of knowledge to be the same in all cases ; and the fact of the body continuing to exist subsequently to the rise of knowledge may be accounted for by the force of an impulse once imparted, just as in the case of the revolution of a potter's wheel. — This view the Sutra sets aside. Only those previous works perish the effects of which have not yet begun to operate ; for the text c For him there is delay as long as he is not delivered from the body ' (Kk. Up. VI, 14, 2) expressly states when the delay of the body's death will come to an end (the body meanwhile continuing to exist through the influence of the anarabdhakarya works). There is no proof for the existence of an impetus accounting for the continuance of the body's life, other than the Lord's pleasure or displeasure caused by good or evil deeds. — Here terminates the adhikara;/a of * the works the operation of which has not yet begun.'
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1long as life lasts he reaches the world of Brahman/ — Here terminates the adhikara/za of ' up to death/ 13. On the attainment of this, there result the non-clinging and the destruction of later and earlier sins ; this being declared. Having, so far, elucidated the nature of meditation, the Sutras now begin to consider the result of meditation. Scripture declares that on the knowledge of Brahman being attained a man's later and earlier sins do not cling to him but pass away. ' As water does not cling to a lotus leaf, so no evil deed clings to him who knows this ' (Kh. Up. IV, 14, 3) ; ' Having known that he is not sullied by any evil deed ' (Brt. Up. IV, 4, 23) ; ' As the fibres of the Ishika reed when thrown into the fire are burnt, thus all his sins are burnt' (Kh. Up. V, 24, 3); 'All his works perish when He has been beheld who is high and low ' (Mu. Up. II, 2, 8). — The doubt here arises whether this non-clinging and destruction of all sins is possible as the result of mere meditation, or not. — It is not possible, the Purvapakshin maintains ; for Scripture declares, c no work the fruits of which have not been completely enjoyed perishes even in millions of aeons.' What the texts, quoted above, say as to the non-clinging and destruction of works occurs in sections complementary to passages inculcating knowledge as the means of final Release, and may therefore be understood as somehow meant to eulogize knowledge. Nor can it be said that knowledge is enjoined as an expiation of sins, so that the destruction of sins could be conceived as resulting from such expiation ; for knowledge — as we see from texts such as ' He who knows Brahman reaches the Highest,' ' He knows Brahman and he becomes Brahman' — is enjoined as a means to reach Brahman. The texts as to the non- clinging and destruction of sins therefore can only be viewed as arthavada passages supplementary to the texts enjoining knowledge of Brahman. — This view the Sutra sets aside. When a man reaches knowledge, the non- clinging and destruction of all sins may be effected through the power of knowledge. For Scripture declares the power IV ADHYAYA, I PADA, I 3. 723
2— This view the Sutra sets aside. When a man reaches knowledge, the non- clinging and destruction of all sins may be effected through the power of knowledge. For Scripture declares the power IV ADHYAYA, I PADA, I 3. 723 of knowledge to be such that * to him who knows this, no evil deed clings/ and so on. Nor is this in conflict with the text stating that no work not fully enjoyed perishes ; for this latter text aims at confirming the power of works to produce their results ; while the texts under discussion have for their aim to declare that knowledge when once sprung up possesses the power of destroying the capability of previously committed sins to produce their own evil results and the power of obstructing that capability on the part of future evil actions. The two sets of texts thus refer to different matters, and hence are not mutually con- tradictory. There is in fact no more contradiction between them than there is between the power of fire to produce heat and the power of water to subdue such heat. By knowledge effecting the non-clinging of sin we have to understand its obstructing the origination of the power, on the part of sin, to cause that disastrous disposition on the part of man which consists in unfitness for religious works ; for sins committed tend to render man unfit for religious works and inclined to commit further sinful actions of the same kind. By knowledge effecting the destruction of sin, on the other hand, we understand its destroying that power of sin after it has once originated. That power consists, funda- mentally, in displeasure on the part of the Lord. Know- ledge of the Lord, which, owing to the supreme dearness of its object is itself supremely dear, possesses the character- istic power of propitiating the Lord — the object of know- ledge— and thus destroys the displeasure of the Lord due to the previous commission of sins on the part of the knowing Devotee ; and at the same time obstructs the origination of further displeasure on the Lord's part, which otherwise would be caused by sins committed subsequently to the origination of such knowledge. What Scripture says about sin not clinging to him who knows can however be understood only with regard to such sins as spring from thoughtlessness ; for texts such as ' he who has not turned away from evil conduct ' (Ka. Up. I, 2, 24) teach that medi- tation, becoming more perfect day after day, cannot be accomplished without the Devotee having previously broken 3 A2 724 VEDANTA-SUTRAS. himself off from all evil conduct. — Here terminates the adhikara/za of ' the reaching of that.' 14. Of the other also there is thus non-clinging; but at death.
3himself off from all evil conduct. — Here terminates the adhikara/za of ' the reaching of that.' 14. Of the other also there is thus non-clinging; but at death. It has been said that, owing to knowledge, earlier and subsequent sins do not cling and are destroyed. The same holds good also with regard to the other, i. e. to good works — they also, owing to knowledge, do not cling and are destroyed ; for there is the same antagonism between knowledge and the fruit of those works, and Scripture moreover expressly declares this. Thus we read, ' Day and night do not pass that bank — neither good nor evil deeds. All sins turn back from it' (Kk. Up. VIII, 4, 1); c He shakes off his good and evil deeds ' (Kau. Up. I, 4). In the former of these texts good works are expressly designated as 'sin' because their fruits also are some- thing not desirable for him who aims at Release ; there is some reason for doing this because after all good works are enjoined by Scripture and their fruits are desired by men, and they hence might be thought not to be opposed to know- ledge.— But even to him who possesses the knowledge of Brahman, the fruits of good deeds — such as seasonable rain, good crops, &c.— are desirable because they enable him to perform his meditations in due form ; how then can it be said that knowledge is antagonistic to them and destroys them ? — Of this point the Sutra disposes by means of the clause ' but on death/ Good works which produce results favourable to knowledge and meditation perish only on the death of the body (not during the lifetime of the Devotee). — Here terminates the adhikara^a of ' the other/ 15. But only those former works the effects of which have not yet begun ; on account of that being the term. A new doubt prises here, viz. whether all previous good and evil works are destroyed by the Origination of know- ledge, or only those the effects of which have not yet begun to operate. — All wrorks alike, the Purvapakshin says ; for the texts — as e. g. ' all sins are burned ' — declare the fruits IV ADHYAYA, I PAD A, 1 6. 725 of knowledge to be the same in all cases ; and the fact of the body continuing to exist subsequently to the rise of knowledge may be accounted for by the force of an impulse once imparted, just as in the case of the revolution of a potter's wheel. — This view the Sutra sets aside. Only those previous works perish the effects of which have not yet begun to operate ; for the text c For him there is delay as long as he is not delivered from the body ' (Kk. Up. VI, 14, 2) expressly states when the delay of the body's death will come to an end (the body meanwhile continuing to exist through the influence of the anarabdhakarya works). There is no proof for the existence of an impetus accounting for the continuance of the body's life, other than the Lord's pleasure or displeasure caused by good or evil deeds. — Here terminates the adhikara;/a of * the works the operation of which has not yet begun.'
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.