Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1May my mind be filled with devotion towards the highest Brahman, the abode of Lakshmi ; who is luminously revealed in the Upanishads ; who in sport produces, sus- tains, and reabsorbs the entire Universe ; whose only aim is to foster the manifold classes of beings that humbly worship him. The nectar of the teaching of Parlrara's son (Vyasa), — which was brought up from the middle of the milk-ocean of the Upanishads — which restores to life the souls whose vital strength had departed owing to the heat of the fire of transmigratory existence — which was well guarded by the teachers of old — which was obscured by the mutual conflict of manifold opinions, — may intelligent men daily enjoy that as it is now presented to them in my words. The lengthy explanation (vrztti) of the Brahma-sutras which was composed by the Reverend Bodhayana has been abridged by former teachers ; according to their views the words of the Sutras will be explained in this present work. i. Then therefore the enquiry into Brahman. In this Sutra the word 'then' expresses immediate sequence; the word ' therefore' intimates that what has taken place (viz. the study of the karmaka/z^a of the Veda) constitutes the reason (of the enquiry into Brahman). For the fact is that the enquiry into (lit. ' the desire to know ') Brahman — the fruit of which enquiry is infinite in nature and permanent — follows immediately in the case of him who, having read the Veda together with its auxiliary B 2 vedanta-s6tras. disciplines, has reached the knowledge that the fruit of mere works is limited and non-permanent, and hence has conceived the desire of final release. The compound * brahma^i^Tzasa ' is to be explained as 4 the enquiry of Brahman/ the genitive case ' of Brahman ' being understood to denote the object ; in agreement with the special rule as to the meaning of the genitive case, Pacini II, 3, 65. It might be said that even if we accepted the general meaning of the genitive case — which is that of connexion in general — Brahman's position (in the above compound) as an object would be established by the circumstance that the c enquiry ' demands an object ; but in agreement with the principle that the direct denota- tion of a word is to be preferred to a meaning inferred we take the genitive case 'of Brahman* as denoting the object.
2The word * Brahman ' denotes the highest Person (puru- shottama), who is essentially free from all imperfections and possesses numberless classes of auspicious qualities of unsurpassable excellence. The term c Brahman ' is applied to any things which possess the quality of greatness (bWhattva, from the root * brih ') ; but primarily denotes that which possesses greatness, of essential nature as well as of qualities, in unlimited fulness ; and such is only the Lord of all. Hence the word ' Brahman* primarily denotes him alone, and in a secondary derivative sense only those things which possess some small part of the Lord's quali- ties ; for it would be improper to assume several meanings for the word (so that it would denote primarily or directly more than one thing). The case is analogous to that of the term 'bhagavat1.' The Lord only is enquired into, for the sake of immortality, by all those who are afflicted with the triad of pain. Hence the Lord of all is that Brahman which, according to the Sutra, constitutes the object of enquiry. The word '^i^asa' is a desiderative formation meaning 'desire to know.' And as in the 1 ' Bhagavat ' denotes primarily the Lord, the Divinity ; second- arily any holy person. I ADHYAYA, I PADA, I.
3The word '^i^asa' is a desiderative formation meaning 'desire to know.' And as in the 1 ' Bhagavat ' denotes primarily the Lord, the Divinity ; second- arily any holy person. I ADHYAYA, I PADA, I. case of any desire the desired object is the chief thing, the Sfitra means to enjoin knowledge — which is the object of the desire of knowledge. The purport of the entire Stitra then is as follows: 'Since the fruit of works known through the earlier part of the Mima;/?sa is limited and non-permanent, and since the fruit of the knowledge of Brahman — which knowledge is to be reached through the latter part of the Mima^sa — is unlimited and permanent ; for this reason Brahman is to be known, after the knowledge of works has previously taken place/ — The same meaning is expressed by the VWttik&ra when saying * after the comprehension of works has taken place there follows the enquiry into Brahman.' And that the enquiry into works and that into Brahman constitute one body of doctrine, he (the VWttikara) will declare later on ' this vS&riraka-doctrine is connected with Caimini's doctrine as contained in sixteen adhyayas ; this proves the two to constitute one body of doctrine.' Hence the earlier and the later Mima/^sa are separate only in so far as there is a difference of matter to be taught by each ; in the same way as the two halves of the Purva Mima;/zsa-sutras, con- sisting of six adhyayas each, are separate x ; and as each adhyaya is separate. The entire Mima;/zsa-.yastra — which begins with the Sutra ' Now therefore the enquiry into religious duty ' and concludes with the Sutra f (From there is) no return on account of scriptural statement' — has, owing to the special character of the contents, a definite order of internal succession. This is as follows. At first the precept 'one is to learn one's own text (svadhyclya) ' enjoins the apprehension of that aggregate of syllables which is called ' Veda,' and is here referred to as ' sva- dhyaya.' Next there arises the desire to know of what nature the ' Learning ' enjoined is to be, and how it is to be done. Here there come in certain injunctions such as 1 The first six books of the Purva Mimaztfsa-sutras give rules for the fundamental forms of the sacrifice ; while the last six books teach how these rules are to be applied to the so-called modified forms. VEDANTA-sftTRAS. ' Let a Brahma/za be initiated in his eighth year ' and ' The teacher is to make him recite the Veda ' ; and certain rules about special observances and restrictions — such as ' having performed the upakarman on the full moon of Srava/za or Praush^apada according to prescription, he is to study the sacred verses for four months and a half ' — which enjoin all the required details.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1May my mind be filled with devotion towards the highest Brahman, the abode of Lakshmi ; who is luminously revealed in the Upanishads ; who in sport produces, sus- tains, and reabsorbs the entire Universe ; whose only aim is to foster the manifold classes of beings that humbly worship him. The nectar of the teaching of Parlrara's son (Vyasa), — which was brought up from the middle of the milk-ocean of the Upanishads — which restores to life the souls whose vital strength had departed owing to the heat of the fire of transmigratory existence — which was well guarded by the teachers of old — which was obscured by the mutual conflict of manifold opinions, — may intelligent men daily enjoy that as it is now presented to them in my words. The lengthy explanation (vrztti) of the Brahma-sutras which was composed by the Reverend Bodhayana has been abridged by former teachers ; according to their views the words of the Sutras will be explained in this present work. i. Then therefore the enquiry into Brahman. In this Sutra the word 'then' expresses immediate sequence; the word ' therefore' intimates that what has taken place (viz. the study of the karmaka/z^a of the Veda) constitutes the reason (of the enquiry into Brahman). For the fact is that the enquiry into (lit. ' the desire to know ') Brahman — the fruit of which enquiry is infinite in nature and permanent — follows immediately in the case of him who, having read the Veda together with its auxiliary B 2 vedanta-s6tras. disciplines, has reached the knowledge that the fruit of mere works is limited and non-permanent, and hence has conceived the desire of final release. The compound * brahma^i^Tzasa ' is to be explained as 4 the enquiry of Brahman/ the genitive case ' of Brahman ' being understood to denote the object ; in agreement with the special rule as to the meaning of the genitive case, Pacini II, 3, 65. It might be said that even if we accepted the general meaning of the genitive case — which is that of connexion in general — Brahman's position (in the above compound) as an object would be established by the circumstance that the c enquiry ' demands an object ; but in agreement with the principle that the direct denota- tion of a word is to be preferred to a meaning inferred we take the genitive case 'of Brahman* as denoting the object.
2The word * Brahman ' denotes the highest Person (puru- shottama), who is essentially free from all imperfections and possesses numberless classes of auspicious qualities of unsurpassable excellence. The term c Brahman ' is applied to any things which possess the quality of greatness (bWhattva, from the root * brih ') ; but primarily denotes that which possesses greatness, of essential nature as well as of qualities, in unlimited fulness ; and such is only the Lord of all. Hence the word ' Brahman* primarily denotes him alone, and in a secondary derivative sense only those things which possess some small part of the Lord's quali- ties ; for it would be improper to assume several meanings for the word (so that it would denote primarily or directly more than one thing). The case is analogous to that of the term 'bhagavat1.' The Lord only is enquired into, for the sake of immortality, by all those who are afflicted with the triad of pain. Hence the Lord of all is that Brahman which, according to the Sutra, constitutes the object of enquiry. The word '^i^asa' is a desiderative formation meaning 'desire to know.' And as in the 1 ' Bhagavat ' denotes primarily the Lord, the Divinity ; second- arily any holy person. I ADHYAYA, I PADA, I.
3The word '^i^asa' is a desiderative formation meaning 'desire to know.' And as in the 1 ' Bhagavat ' denotes primarily the Lord, the Divinity ; second- arily any holy person. I ADHYAYA, I PADA, I. case of any desire the desired object is the chief thing, the Sfitra means to enjoin knowledge — which is the object of the desire of knowledge. The purport of the entire Stitra then is as follows: 'Since the fruit of works known through the earlier part of the Mima;/?sa is limited and non-permanent, and since the fruit of the knowledge of Brahman — which knowledge is to be reached through the latter part of the Mima^sa — is unlimited and permanent ; for this reason Brahman is to be known, after the knowledge of works has previously taken place/ — The same meaning is expressed by the VWttik&ra when saying * after the comprehension of works has taken place there follows the enquiry into Brahman.' And that the enquiry into works and that into Brahman constitute one body of doctrine, he (the VWttikara) will declare later on ' this vS&riraka-doctrine is connected with Caimini's doctrine as contained in sixteen adhyayas ; this proves the two to constitute one body of doctrine.' Hence the earlier and the later Mima/^sa are separate only in so far as there is a difference of matter to be taught by each ; in the same way as the two halves of the Purva Mima;/zsa-sutras, con- sisting of six adhyayas each, are separate x ; and as each adhyaya is separate. The entire Mima;/zsa-.yastra — which begins with the Sutra ' Now therefore the enquiry into religious duty ' and concludes with the Sutra f (From there is) no return on account of scriptural statement' — has, owing to the special character of the contents, a definite order of internal succession. This is as follows. At first the precept 'one is to learn one's own text (svadhyclya) ' enjoins the apprehension of that aggregate of syllables which is called ' Veda,' and is here referred to as ' sva- dhyaya.' Next there arises the desire to know of what nature the ' Learning ' enjoined is to be, and how it is to be done. Here there come in certain injunctions such as 1 The first six books of the Purva Mimaztfsa-sutras give rules for the fundamental forms of the sacrifice ; while the last six books teach how these rules are to be applied to the so-called modified forms. VEDANTA-sftTRAS. ' Let a Brahma/za be initiated in his eighth year ' and ' The teacher is to make him recite the Veda ' ; and certain rules about special observances and restrictions — such as ' having performed the upakarman on the full moon of Srava/za or Praush^apada according to prescription, he is to study the sacred verses for four months and a half ' — which enjoin all the required details.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.