The Bhagavadgîtâ, with the Sanatsugâtîya and the Anugîtâ — SBE Vol. 8 (trans. K. T. Telang, 1882)

Open to allEdited by F. Max Müller; translated by Müller, Legge, Bühler, West, Darmesteter, Palmer, Telang, Thibaut, Jolly, Rhys Davids, Oldenberg, Jacobi, Bloomfield and others2259 segments · 127 pp
page 339

The translator’s English as printed (K. T. Telang). The original-language text is not held; names are romanised as the translator printed them.

1 Cf. Khandogya, pp. 404-406, and glosses; Aitareya, p. 243; Vedanta Paribhâshâ, p. 47; Sânkhya-sûtra V, 111; Manu I, 43; Max Miiller’s note at p. 94 of his Khândogya in this series.

2 So Nîlakaṇṭha, but he also adds that this means birth as a Brâhmaṇa, which seems to be quite wrong. Arguna Misra’s ‘means of acquiring Brahman’ is right. See p. 369 infra. $ J.e., I presume, ‘knowledge.’ Sankara has so interpreted the word at Muṇḍaka, p. 270, and Kaṭha, p. 127, and elsewhere ; and see Sanatsugatiya, p. 166 supra.

4 Another reading is ‘of two kinds.’ But I prefer this, as three kinds are mentioned further on.

page 339

1 Cf. Khandogya, pp. 404–406, and glosses; Aitareya, p. 243; Vedanta Paribhâshâ, p. 47; Sânkhya-sûtra V, 111; Manu I, 43; Max Müller's note at p. 94 of his Khândogya in this series.

2 Nîlakaṇṭha says this, but he also adds that it means birth as a Brâhmaṇa, which seems quite wrong. Arjuna Misra's reading, 'means of acquiring Brahman,' is correct. See p. 369 infra. $ That is, I presume, 'knowledge.' Sankara interprets the word this way at Muṇḍaka, p. 270, and Kaṭha, p. 127, and elsewhere; see also Sanatsujâtîya, p. 166 supra.

4 Another reading is 'of two kinds.' But I prefer this, as three kinds are mentioned further on.

Commentary
page 339 ·

No commentary for this page.

There is commentary on pages 1, 2.