The Theology of Plato, in six books — trans. Thomas Taylor

Open to allProclus; trans. Thomas Taylor505 segments · 169 pp

The text is shown on its own: no facing layer is held for this issue.

page 13

the third region of the world, which the sea possesses, having an arrangement after the heavens and the air. Hence also, they thus denominated Amphitritc and the Tritons. The Pythagoreans likewise adorned numbers and figures with the appellations of the Gods. For they called the equilateral triangle Minerva Coryphagenes, or begotten from the summit, and Tritogeneia, because it is divided by three perpendiculars drawn from tbe three angles. But they called die one Apollo, being per- •uaded to this by the obvious meaning of the word Apollo [which signifies a privation of multitude] and bv the simplicity of the monad.' Hie duad they denominated strife and audacity ; and the triad justice. For since injuring and being injured are two extremes subsisting according to excess and defect, justice through equality has a situation in the middle. But what is called the tctractys, being the number 36, was, as is reported, their greatest oath, and was denominated the world. For this number is formed from tbe composition of the four first even, and the four first odd numbers, collected into one sum.1 If therefore the most approved of the philosophers did not think it proper to neglect or despise any occult signification of a divine nature when" they perceived it even in things which are inanimate and incorporeal, it appears to me, that they in a still greater degree venerated those peculiarities depending on manners which they saw in such natures as had sense, aud were endued with soul, with passion, and ethical habits. We must embrace therefore, not those who honor these kings, but those who reverence divinity through these, as through most clear mirrors, and which are produced by nature, in a becoming manner, conceiving them to be the instruments or the art of the God by whom all things arc perpetually adorned. But we ought to think that no inanimate being cau be more excellent than one that is animated, nor an insensible than a sensitive being, not even though some one should collect together all the gold and emeralds in the universe. For tlie divinity is not ingeuerated either in colours, or figures, or smoothness; but such things as neither ever did, nor are naturally adapted to participate of life, have an allotment more ignoble than that of dead bodies.

old and emeralds in the universe. For tlie divinity is not ingeuerated either in colours, or figures, or smoothness; but such things as neither ever did, nor are naturally adapted to participate of life, have an allotment more ignoble than that of dead bodies. But the nature which lives and sees, and has the principle of motion from itself, and a knowledge of tilings appropriate and foreign to its being, has certainly derived an efflux and portion of that wisdom, which, as Heraclitus says, considers how both itself, aud the universe is governed. Hence the divinity is not worse represented in these animals, than in the workmanships of copper and stone, which in a similar manner suffer corruption ami decay, hut arc naturally deprived of all sense and consciousness. This then I consider as the best defence that cau be given of the adoration of animals by the Egyptians.

■ Instead of J'tm*™i as in the original, which is nooscim, it is necetsary to r*aJ, as in the above translation ««>*t^ti tic pWo:.

1 For»+4+6+8=l«0; and 1+S+S+7=1«; and 20+16=30.

I INTRODUCTION.

uiii

With respect however to the sacred vestments, those of Iais are of various hue* ; for her power is about matter, which becomes and receives all things, as light and darkness, day and night, fire and water, life and death, beginning and end ; but those of Osiris are without a shade and have no variety of colours, but have one only which is simple and luciform. Hence when the latter have been once used, they are laid aside and preserved ; for the intelligible is invisible and intangible. But the vestments of Isis are used frequently. For sensible things being in daily use and at hand, present us with many developements and views of their different mutations : but the intellectual perception of that which is intelligible, genuine, and holy, luminously darting through the soul like a coruscation, is attended with a simultaneous contact and vision of its object. Hence Plato and Aristotle call this part of philosophy epoplic or intuitive, indicating that those who have through the exercise of the reasoning power, soared beyond these doxastic, mingled and all- various natures, raise themselves to that first, simple, and immaterial principle, and passing into contact with the pure truth which subsists about it, they consider themselves as having at length obtained the end of philosophy.' And that which the present devoted and veiled priests obscurely manifest with great reverence and caution is that this God is the ruler and prince of the dead, and is not different from consider themselves as having at length obtained the end of philosophy.' And that which the present devoted and veiled priests obscurely manifest with great reverence and caution is that this God is the ruler and prince of the dead, and is not different from that divinity who is called by the Greeks Hades and Pluto, the truth of which assertion not being understood, disturbs the multitude, who suspeet that the truly sacred and holy Osiris dwell* in and under the earth, where the bodies of those are concealed who appear to have obtained an end of their being. But he indeed himself is at the remotest distance from the earth, unstained, unpolluted, and pure from every essence that receives corruption and death. The souls of men however, being here encompassed with bodies and passiuu*, cannot participate of divinity except as of an obscure dream by intellectual contact through philosophy. But when they are liberated from the body, and pans into the invisible, impassive, and pure region, this God is then their leader and king, from whom they depend, insatiably beholding him, and desiring to survey that beauty which cannot be expressed or uttered by men ; and which lsis, as the ancient discourse evinces, always loving, pursuing, and enjoying fills such things in these lower regions as participate of gene, ration with every thing beautiful and good."

And lastly, the Emperor Julian, in a fragment of an Oration or Epistle on the duties of a priest, has the following remarks on religiously venerating statues : " Statues and altars, and the preservation of unextinguished fire, and in short, all such particulars, have been established by our fathers as symbols of the preseuce of the Gods; not that tee should believe that thete tymboU art Gods, but that through thete we should vorthip the God$. For since we are connected with body, xl INTRODUCTION.

* For T-Xf •xi.M<x.«»pU", it is necessary to read as in the translation, «x.t ix«" »-x*r»f *">

it is alio Decenary that our worship of the God* should be performed in a corporeal manner; but they are incorporeal. And they indeed have exhibited to us aa the first of statues, that which ranks as the second genus of Gods from the first, and which circularly revolves round the whole of heaven.1 Since, however, a corporeal worship cannot even be paid to these, because they are naturally unindigenl, a third kind of statues was devised on the earth, by the worship of which we render the Gods propitious to us.

Commentary
page 13 ·

No commentary for this page under the selected tracks.

There is commentary on page 1.