Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1buddhi exists potentially merely during deep sleep and the period of general retractation, and again becomes manifest at the time of waking and the time of creation. — This explanation is appropriate, because nothing can be assumed to spring up unless from something else ; otherwise we should have to suppose that effects spring up without causes. That the rising from deep sleep is due to the existence of potential avidya, scripture also declares, ' Having become merged in the True they know not that they are merged in the True. Whatever these creatures are here, whether a lion or a wolf,' &c. [Kh. Up. VI, 9, 2 ; 3). — It is therefore a proved matter that the connexion of the soul with the buddhi and the other adjuncts lasts as long as the soul (in its sawsira-state). 32. Otherwise (if no manas existed) there would result either constant perception or constant nonperception, or else a limitation of either of the two (i.e. of the soul or of the senses).
2The internal organ which constitutes the limiting adjunct of the soul is called in different places by different names, such as manas (mind), buddhi (intelligence), vi^;/^na (knowledge), ^itta (thought). This difference of nomenclature is sometimes made dependent on the difference of the modifications of the internal organ which is called manas when it is in the state of doubt, &c., buddhi when it is in the state of determination and the like. — Now we must necessarily acknowledge the existence of such an internal organ ; because otherwise there would result either perpetual perception or perpetual non-perception. There would result perpetual perception whenever there is a conjunction of the soul, the senses and the objects of sense — the three together constituting the instruments of perception; or else, if on the conjunction of the three causes the effect did not follow, there would take place perpetual nonperception. But neither of these two alternatives is actually observed. — Or else we should have to assume that there are obstacles in the way of the energy either of the Self or the sense-organs. But the former is not possible, as the I II ADHYAYA, 3 PADA, 34. 49
3Self is not capable of any modification ; nor the latter, as we cannot assume that the energy of the sense-organ which is non-obstructed in the preceding and the following moment should, without any cause, be obstructed (in the intervening moment). Hence we have to acknowledge the existence of an internal organ through whose attention and non-attention perception and non-perception take place. Thus scripture declares, ' My mind was elsewhere, I did not see ; my mind was elsewhere, I did not hear ; for a man sees with his mind and hears with his mind ' (Br/. Up. I, ,5, 3). Scripture moreover shows that desire and similar states are modifications of the mind, ' Desire, representation, doubt, faith, want of faith, memory, forgetfulness, shame, reflection, fear, all this is mind.' The explanation given in Sutra 29 is therefore an appropriate one. 33. (The soul is) an agent, on account of scripture having a purport (thereby).
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1buddhi exists potentially merely during deep sleep and the period of general retractation, and again becomes manifest at the time of waking and the time of creation. — This explanation is appropriate, because nothing can be assumed to spring up unless from something else ; otherwise we should have to suppose that effects spring up without causes. That the rising from deep sleep is due to the existence of potential avidya, scripture also declares, ' Having become merged in the True they know not that they are merged in the True. Whatever these creatures are here, whether a lion or a wolf,' &c. [Kh. Up. VI, 9, 2 ; 3). — It is therefore a proved matter that the connexion of the soul with the buddhi and the other adjuncts lasts as long as the soul (in its sawsira-state). 32. Otherwise (if no manas existed) there would result either constant perception or constant nonperception, or else a limitation of either of the two (i.e. of the soul or of the senses).
2The internal organ which constitutes the limiting adjunct of the soul is called in different places by different names, such as manas (mind), buddhi (intelligence), vi^;/^na (knowledge), ^itta (thought). This difference of nomenclature is sometimes made dependent on the difference of the modifications of the internal organ which is called manas when it is in the state of doubt, &c., buddhi when it is in the state of determination and the like. — Now we must necessarily acknowledge the existence of such an internal organ ; because otherwise there would result either perpetual perception or perpetual non-perception. There would result perpetual perception whenever there is a conjunction of the soul, the senses and the objects of sense — the three together constituting the instruments of perception; or else, if on the conjunction of the three causes the effect did not follow, there would take place perpetual nonperception. But neither of these two alternatives is actually observed. — Or else we should have to assume that there are obstacles in the way of the energy either of the Self or the sense-organs. But the former is not possible, as the I II ADHYAYA, 3 PADA, 34. 49
3Self is not capable of any modification ; nor the latter, as we cannot assume that the energy of the sense-organ which is non-obstructed in the preceding and the following moment should, without any cause, be obstructed (in the intervening moment). Hence we have to acknowledge the existence of an internal organ through whose attention and non-attention perception and non-perception take place. Thus scripture declares, ' My mind was elsewhere, I did not see ; my mind was elsewhere, I did not hear ; for a man sees with his mind and hears with his mind ' (Br/. Up. I, ,5, 3). Scripture moreover shows that desire and similar states are modifications of the mind, ' Desire, representation, doubt, faith, want of faith, memory, forgetfulness, shame, reflection, fear, all this is mind.' The explanation given in Sutra 29 is therefore an appropriate one. 33. (The soul is) an agent, on account of scripture having a purport (thereby).
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.