Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1We now have to refute the objection, made above by the purvapakshin, that the highest Self cannot be meant ' on account of the connected meaning of the passage.' — The Sutrakara remarks, ' It is so, on account of the assertion.' That means : It is appropriate to understand the passage as referring to the highest Self, because thus the assertion that the Self, previously to the creation, was one only, gives a fully satisfactory sense, while on the other interpretation it would be far from doing so. The creation of the worlds recorded in the Aitareyaka we connect with the creation of the elements recorded in other Vedic texts, in that way that we understand the worlds to have been created subsequently to the elements; just as we showed above (11,4, 1) that the passage, ' It sent forth fire,' must be understood to say that the creation of fire followed on the creation of ether 2o8 vedAnta-sCtras.
2and air as known from other texts. For, as proved by us before, particulars mentioned in one scriptural text have to be combined with particulars mentioned in other texts, if only the chief subject of the passages is the same. — The details about the activity of the Self referred to by the purvapakshin have likewise to be understood in such a way as to agree with the general matter about which the text desires to make assertions. For we must by no means assume that the text is interested in setting forth all the details of the story on their own account ; the knowledge of them would be in no way beneficial to man. The only thing the text really means to teach is the truth that Brahman is the Self of everything. Hence it first relates how the different w^orlds and the guardians of the worlds, viz. Agni and so on, were created ; explains thereupon the origination of the organs and the body, their abode ; and shows how the creator having thought, ' How can all this be without me ? ' (H, 4, 3, 4), entered into this body, ' Opening the suture of the skull he got in by that door' (7). Then again the text relates how the Self after having considered the activities of all the organs (' if speech names,' &c. ; 6) asked himself the question, 'What am I?' and thereupon 'saw this person as the widely spread Brahman' (10). The aim of all which is to declare that Brahman is the universal Self. The same truth is inculcated in a subsequent passage also, viz. H, 6, ij 5; 6, where the text at first enumerates the whole aggregate of individual existences together with the elements, and then continues, 'All this is led by knowledge (i.e. the highest Self) ; it rests on knowledge. The world is led by knowledge, knowledge is its rest, knowledge is Brahman.' — For all these reasons the view that the highest Brahman is meant in the Aitareyaka is not open to any objections.
3The two preceding Sutras may also be explained with reference to some other Vedic passages. We read in the Va^asaneyaka (Brz. Up. IV, 3, 7), ' Who is that Self? — He who is within the heart, surrounded by the pra;zas, consisting of knowledge, the person of light.' Of the Self here first mentioned the text goes on to show that it is free from all contact and thus proves it to have Brahman Ill ADHYAYA, 3 PADA, 1 7. 209
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1We now have to refute the objection, made above by the purvapakshin, that the highest Self cannot be meant ' on account of the connected meaning of the passage.' — The Sutrakara remarks, ' It is so, on account of the assertion.' That means : It is appropriate to understand the passage as referring to the highest Self, because thus the assertion that the Self, previously to the creation, was one only, gives a fully satisfactory sense, while on the other interpretation it would be far from doing so. The creation of the worlds recorded in the Aitareyaka we connect with the creation of the elements recorded in other Vedic texts, in that way that we understand the worlds to have been created subsequently to the elements; just as we showed above (11,4, 1) that the passage, ' It sent forth fire,' must be understood to say that the creation of fire followed on the creation of ether 2o8 vedAnta-sCtras.
2and air as known from other texts. For, as proved by us before, particulars mentioned in one scriptural text have to be combined with particulars mentioned in other texts, if only the chief subject of the passages is the same. — The details about the activity of the Self referred to by the purvapakshin have likewise to be understood in such a way as to agree with the general matter about which the text desires to make assertions. For we must by no means assume that the text is interested in setting forth all the details of the story on their own account ; the knowledge of them would be in no way beneficial to man. The only thing the text really means to teach is the truth that Brahman is the Self of everything. Hence it first relates how the different w^orlds and the guardians of the worlds, viz. Agni and so on, were created ; explains thereupon the origination of the organs and the body, their abode ; and shows how the creator having thought, ' How can all this be without me ? ' (H, 4, 3, 4), entered into this body, ' Opening the suture of the skull he got in by that door' (7). Then again the text relates how the Self after having considered the activities of all the organs (' if speech names,' &c. ; 6) asked himself the question, 'What am I?' and thereupon 'saw this person as the widely spread Brahman' (10). The aim of all which is to declare that Brahman is the universal Self. The same truth is inculcated in a subsequent passage also, viz. H, 6, ij 5; 6, where the text at first enumerates the whole aggregate of individual existences together with the elements, and then continues, 'All this is led by knowledge (i.e. the highest Self) ; it rests on knowledge. The world is led by knowledge, knowledge is its rest, knowledge is Brahman.' — For all these reasons the view that the highest Brahman is meant in the Aitareyaka is not open to any objections.
3The two preceding Sutras may also be explained with reference to some other Vedic passages. We read in the Va^asaneyaka (Brz. Up. IV, 3, 7), ' Who is that Self? — He who is within the heart, surrounded by the pra;zas, consisting of knowledge, the person of light.' Of the Self here first mentioned the text goes on to show that it is free from all contact and thus proves it to have Brahman Ill ADHYAYA, 3 PADA, 1 7. 209
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.