The Vedânta-Sûtras, Part II, with the Commentary by Sankarâkârya — SBE Vol. 38
The text is shown on its own: no facing layer is held for this issue.
The translator’s English as printed (George Thibaut). The original-language text is not held; names are romanised as the translator printed them.
— Pajupati, 5iva, i, 435.
— the pradhana cannot be ruled by the L. in the same way as the organs are ruled by the soul, i, 437 seq.
— such terms as L. and the like cannot be applied to the individual soul, i, p. xxxix.
— highest, is not, like the individual soul, the cause of evil, i, p. xlix, 343-346.
who abides within the soul, is not affected by the imperfections clinging to the soul, i, pp. Ixii-lxiv.
the intelligent Self is the, i,
15, 234, 290 ; ii, 337-340.
difl^erent from the individual soul, i, p. xcviii, 70, 81, 159 seq., 187, 234; ii, 290 seq.
the released soul, ii, 418.
is himself the individual soul, not anything else, i, 279 ; ii,
65 seq., 138 seq., 140, 244 seq.,
291, 338, 339 seq.
Lord, highest, stands in the realm of the phenomenal in the relation of a ruler to the individual souls, i, 329.
with a view to the efforts made by the soul the L. makes it act, ii, 59-61.
— — as the soul is affected by pleasure and pain not so the, ii, 63-65.
refutation of the view that a h. L. is not the material but only the operative cause of the world, i, p. Ii, 284, 434-439. 440.
— — the world, according to the
Upanishads, is nothing but a manifestation of the h. L.'s wonderful power, i, p. cxix.
the cause of the world, i, 16,
17, 46, 48, 49, 61, 243, 254,
263-266, 270, 271, 328; ii,
183.
dependency of the world on him, i, 242-245, 290, 370; ii, 415 seq.
arranged at the beginning of the present kalpa the entire world just as it had been arranged in the preceding kalpa, i, 215.
the creation of this world is mere play to him, i, 357.
m^Y, although himself unmoving, move the universe, i, 369.
— — is the creative principle abiding within the elements, ii, 24 seq. is a causal agent in all activity, ii, 59only is eternal and the creator of the world, ii, 416.
— see also ijvara.
— see also Brahman, and Self, Lords, such as Hirawyagarbha, &c., are able to continue their previous forms of existence in each new creation, i, 213, 215. Lotus, as the 1. wanders from one pond to another without any means of conveyance, so Brahman creates the world, i, 348.
[38]
11 h
p. 466
VEDANTA-S^TRAS.
Madhii-vidya, i, 216 seq. ; ii, 233.
INIadhyamikas, or nihilists, believe that everything is void and nothing whatever is real, i, p. Ii, 5 n., 401 n.
IMadhyandinas. See Kawvas.
Magician, 6'ahkara's illustrative instance of the m. producing
illusive sights is not known to
Badarayawa, i, pp. xxv, xciv n.
Magicians, multiform creations exist in them, i, 353.
Mahabharata, Vedantic portions in
it referred to by the Sutras of
Badaraya«a, i, p. cxxvii.
— there is one universal Self according to the, i, 295.
— quoted to show that those who know Brahman do not go or
depart, ii, 375.
Mahejvaras. See ^aivas.
Maitrayawiya-upanishad, Maya in
the, i, pp. cxvii n., cxxi n. Maitreyi, dialogue of M. and Ya-
^^avalkya, i, 274 scqq. Maitreyi-brahmawa, ii, 305, 306. ]Man, fancifully identified with the sacrifice, ii, 220, 221, 265. Man-sacrifice, the particulars of it given in the K/Andogya. are not to be inserted in the Taittiriyaka, ii, 220-222. Manas. See Mind.
— see Internal organ.
Mantras, certain m, and brahmawa passages, met with in the beginning of some Upanishads, do not belong to the brahmavidya, i, p. Ixx ; ii, 222-225.
- — do not constitute an independent means of authoritative knowledge for anything, i, 218.
— though subserving other purposes, are also independent means of knowledge, i, 220-222.
— have occasionally to be explained in a secondary sense, i, 318.
— which are enjoined in one ^akha are taken over by other 6akhas also, ii, 273 seq.
— enjoined in one Veda are valid for other Vedas also, ii, 274.
— and arthavadas as authorities on the gods, i, 198, 203, 217, 219 seq., 223, 304, 348, 355. stories about men who obtained new bodies, in the, ii, 235.
Mantras and arthavadas on the nonreturn of the released Soul, ii,
418 seq.
Manu mentioned in .Sruti, i, 294,
294 n.
— ' Whatever M, said is medicine,'
i, 294.
— blames the doctrine of Kapila, i, 294 seq.
— recommends reasoning, i, 315.
— the doctrine of pradhana accepted
by, i, 394.
Manu-smr/ti opposed to the Sankhya-smr/ti, i, p. xlvii, 291.
INIaruts, i, 202, 216.
INIaterialists, i, p. Ixxiv.
— consider intelligence to be a mere attribute of the body, i, 368.
No commentary for this page under the selected tracks.
There is commentary on page 1.