al interpretation, I have tried, however, to reduce the sphere of etymological guesswork to its narrowest limits, with the help of different Pahlavi, Persian, and Sanskrit translations, which are as yet unpublished, and have been neglected by former translators. I found such translations for the Sirozahs, for Ya^ts I, VI, VII, XI, XXIII, XXIV, and for the Nyayi^^ (besides the already published translations of Yaj-ts XXI and XXII).
Of the remaining Yaj-ts, which are mostly of an epical character, there is no direct translation available; but a close comparison of the legends in Firdausi's Shah Namah seems to throw some light, even as regards philological points, on not a (tw obscure and important passages. This has enabled me, I believe, to restore a few myths to their original form, and to frame a more correct idea of others''^.
In this volume, as in the preceding one, I have to thank Mr. West for his kind assistance in making my translation more readable, as well as for valuable hints in the interpretation of several passages.
JAMES DARMESTETER.
Paris,
13 December, 1882.
* These translations have been edited in our Etudes Iraniennes, II, 253 seq. (Paris, Vieweg, 1883). ^ See ibidem, II, 206 seq.
A A
YA5TS AND SIROZAHS
r
0 ■ ' /
^^''
YA5TS AND SIROZAHS.
The word ya^t, in Zend ye^ti, means properly 'the act of worshipping,' the performance of the yasna; and it is often used in Parsi tradition as synonymous with yasna. But it has also been particularly applied to a certain number of writings in which the several Izeds are praised and magnified. These writings are generally of a higher poetical and epical character than the rest of the Avesta, and are most valuable records of the old mythology and historical legends of Iran.
The Parsis believe that formerly every Amshaspand and every Ized had his particular Ya.st, but we now possess only twenty Yajts and fragments of another ^ The writings known as Yajt fragments, the Afrin Zartujt, and Vijtasp Yast (printed as Yajts XXI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV in Westergaard's edition), are not proper Yai'ts, and have no liturgical character ; they are not devoted to the praise of any Ized.
The order in which the Yajts have been arranged by the Parsis follows exactly the order of the Sirozah, which is the proper introduction to the Yajts.
s1r6zah.
Sirozah means 'thirty days:' it is the name of a prayer composed of thirty invocations addressed to the several Izeds who preside over the thirty days of the month.