Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
14. ‘And which are the three causes of wrong-doing which give rise to legal questions of dispute ? ‘Herein, O Bhikkhus, men of greedy mind are given to dispute, men of evil mind are given to dispute, men of foolish mind are given to dispute, saying, “ This is Dhamma,” or “ This is not Dhamma” [&c., as before, in § 2, down to] or “ This is not a * Palast; no doubt connected with the primary meaning of the word ‘leaf,’ as is also its use in the sense of ‘covering, lining,’ in eka-palasika upahand at Mahavagga V, 1, 29. The expression forms the subject of Puggala II, 2. See also Gataka III, 259. IV, 14, THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES, 29 most grave offence.” These are the three causes of wrong-doing which give rise to legal questions of dispute. ‘And which are the three causes of right-doing which give rise to legal questions of dispute ? ‘Inthe first place, O Bhikkhus, men not of greedy mind [&c., as in the last paragraph, inserting the word “ not”], 5. ‘And what is that, O Bhikkhus, which gives rise to legal questions of censure? There are six causes of censure that give rise to legal questions of censure. And there are three causes of wrong-doing that give rise to legal questions of censure. And there are three causes of right-doing that give rise to legal questions of censure. And the body gives rise to legal questions of censure, and speech gives rise to legal questions of censure.’ [The six are word for word the same as in the last section, reading ‘censure’ for ‘ dispute.’} ‘And which are the three causes of wrong-doing that give rise to legal questions of censure ? ‘Herein, O Bhikkhus, men of greedy mind are given to censure, men of evil mind are given to censure, men of foolish mind are given to censure, accusing others of breaches of morality, or of behaviour, or of error in doctrine, or of adopting a wrong means of livelihood. These are the three causes of wrong-doing that give rise to legal questions of censure.’ ‘ [There follow the three causes of right-doing, reading ‘men not of greedy mind,’ &c., as before, end of § 4.] ‘And how does the body give rise to legal questions of censure? In case a man be ill-favoured, 40 KULLAVAGGA. IV, 14, 6. or ugly, or a dwarf}, or diseased, or blind of one eye, or lame, or humpbacked, or crippled, people find fault with him on that account. This is how the body gives rise to legal questions of censure. ‘And how does speech give rise to legal questions of censure? In case a man have a bad voice, or be indistinct, or harsh in speech ?, then people find fault with him on that account. This is how speech gives rise to legal questions of censure.
2‘And how does speech give rise to legal questions of censure? In case a man have a bad voice, or be indistinct, or harsh in speech ?, then people find fault with him on that account. This is how speech gives rise to legal questions of censure. 6. ‘And what is it that gives rise to legal questions of offence? There are six origins of offence that give rise to legal questions of offence. There is an offence that originates in deed, but not in word nor in thought. There is an offence that originates in word, but not in deed nor in thought. There is an offence that originates in deed and in word, but not in thought. There is an offence that originates in deed and in thought, but not in word. There is an offence that originates in word and in thought, but not in deed. There is an offence that originates in deed and in word and in thought. These are the six (&c.) 7. ‘And what is that which gives rise to legal questions of business? There is one thing that gives rise to legal questions of business, that is to say, the Samgha. 1 Buddhaghosa has no explanation of these terms here, but on Anguttara Nikaya III, 2, 3, where the whole list recurs, he says (as Dr. Morris is good enough to inform us) that okosimako is - equal to lakuz/ako; and the same explanation is given by the commentary on Puggala IV, 19. Compare the use in English of ‘a mere dot of a man,’ in a similar sense. 3 These three epithets of the voice are no doubt intended to be the opposites of the three in Mahdvagga V, 13, 9. IV, 14,10. THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES. C 8. ‘Legal questions of dispute. Right. Wrong. Undetermined 1. ‘A legal question arising out of dispute may be right, and it may be wrong, and it may be undetermined. Of these, which is the legal question arising out of dispute which is right ? ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, the Bhikkhu of right mind discuss, saying, “ This is the Dhamma,” or “ This is not the Dhamma” (&c., as before, in § 2, down to) or “ This is not a most grave offence.” Whatsoever quarrel, strife, contention, difference of opinion, contradiction, opposition, cantankerousness, or contention there may be in such a discussion is called a legal question arising out of dispute that is right.’ [And so when the Bhikkhus have a wrong mind, or an undetermined mind, the legal question arising out of such dispute is respectively a legal question arising out of dispute that is wrong or undetermined. ] 9. ‘Legal questions of censure. Right. Wrong. Undetermined.’ [It may be either of the three, according as the Bhikkhus censuring (as in § 5) have a right, wrong, or an undetermined mind. The form of the paragraph corresponds to § 8 throughout.] 1o. ‘ Legal questions of offence. Right. Wrong. Undetermined. ‘There may be a legal question whether an offence is wrong, and there may be a legal question
3The form of the paragraph corresponds to § 8 throughout.] 1o. ‘ Legal questions of offence. Right. Wrong. Undetermined. ‘There may be a legal question whether an offence is wrong, and there may be a legal question 1 We have already pointed out (above, IV, 1, 2) that this mode of the commencement of a discussion by setting out a list of the points to be discussed and compared is found also in some of the Abhidhamma books. There it was only the objects themselves, here we have all the predicates which it is proposed to apply (as in § 8), or to declare inapplicable to the object (as in § 10), which are set out, but the principle is the same. UNIVGigGs 7 42 KULLAVAGGA. IV, 14, 11. whether an offence is undetermined. There is no legal question whether an offence be right. ‘Of these, which is a legal question whether an offence be wrong? Whatsoever transgression be committed knowingly, consciously, and deliberately, this is called a legal question whether an offence be wrong. ‘ And of these, which is a legal question whether an offence be undetermined ? Whatsoever transgression be committed not knowingly, not consciously, not deliberately, this is called a legal question whether an offence be undetermined. 11. ‘ Legal questions of business. Right. Wrong. Undetermined.’ [It may be all three, according as the Bhikkhus performing the business specified, as in 9 2, are rightminded, wrong-minded, or of undetermined mind. The form of the paragraph as in § 8 throughout.] 12. ‘ Disputes, legal questions arising out of disputes. Dispute which is no legal question. Legal question which is no dispute. Matter which is both legal question and dispute. ‘There may be a dispute which is a legal question of dispute. There may be a dispute which is no legal question. There may be such a legal question which is no dispute. There may be such a legal question and also a dispute. ‘Of these, which is the dispute which is a legal question of dispute requiring formal settlement ? In case Bhikkhus discuss, saying, “ This is Dhamma” [&c., as before, in § 2], or “ This is not a most grave offence.” Whatsoever quarrel, strife [&c., as in § 2] there may be on such a matter is a dispute which is a legal question of dispute requiring formal settlement. IV, 14,144 THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES. 43 ‘And of these, which is a dispute which is not a legal question requiring formal settlement? When a mother disputes with her son, or a son with his mother, or a father with his son, or a son with his father, or a brother with a brother, or a brother with a sister, or a sister with a brother, or a friend with a friend. Such adispute is not a legal question requiring formal settlement by the Samgha. ‘And of these, which is a legal question that is not a dispute? A legal question of censure, or a legal question of offence, or a legal question of business. This is a legal question which is not a dispute.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
14. ‘And which are the three causes of wrong-doing which give rise to legal questions of dispute ? ‘Herein, O Bhikkhus, men of greedy mind are given to dispute, men of evil mind are given to dispute, men of foolish mind are given to dispute, saying, “ This is Dhamma,” or “ This is not Dhamma” [&c., as before, in § 2, down to] or “ This is not a * Palast; no doubt connected with the primary meaning of the word ‘leaf,’ as is also its use in the sense of ‘covering, lining,’ in eka-palasika upahand at Mahavagga V, 1, 29. The expression forms the subject of Puggala II, 2. See also Gataka III, 259. IV, 14, THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES, 29 most grave offence.” These are the three causes of wrong-doing which give rise to legal questions of dispute. ‘And which are the three causes of right-doing which give rise to legal questions of dispute ? ‘Inthe first place, O Bhikkhus, men not of greedy mind [&c., as in the last paragraph, inserting the word “ not”], 5. ‘And what is that, O Bhikkhus, which gives rise to legal questions of censure? There are six causes of censure that give rise to legal questions of censure. And there are three causes of wrong-doing that give rise to legal questions of censure. And there are three causes of right-doing that give rise to legal questions of censure. And the body gives rise to legal questions of censure, and speech gives rise to legal questions of censure.’ [The six are word for word the same as in the last section, reading ‘censure’ for ‘ dispute.’} ‘And which are the three causes of wrong-doing that give rise to legal questions of censure ? ‘Herein, O Bhikkhus, men of greedy mind are given to censure, men of evil mind are given to censure, men of foolish mind are given to censure, accusing others of breaches of morality, or of behaviour, or of error in doctrine, or of adopting a wrong means of livelihood. These are the three causes of wrong-doing that give rise to legal questions of censure.’ ‘ [There follow the three causes of right-doing, reading ‘men not of greedy mind,’ &c., as before, end of § 4.] ‘And how does the body give rise to legal questions of censure? In case a man be ill-favoured, 40 KULLAVAGGA. IV, 14, 6. or ugly, or a dwarf}, or diseased, or blind of one eye, or lame, or humpbacked, or crippled, people find fault with him on that account. This is how the body gives rise to legal questions of censure. ‘And how does speech give rise to legal questions of censure? In case a man have a bad voice, or be indistinct, or harsh in speech ?, then people find fault with him on that account. This is how speech gives rise to legal questions of censure.
2‘And how does speech give rise to legal questions of censure? In case a man have a bad voice, or be indistinct, or harsh in speech ?, then people find fault with him on that account. This is how speech gives rise to legal questions of censure. 6. ‘And what is it that gives rise to legal questions of offence? There are six origins of offence that give rise to legal questions of offence. There is an offence that originates in deed, but not in word nor in thought. There is an offence that originates in word, but not in deed nor in thought. There is an offence that originates in deed and in word, but not in thought. There is an offence that originates in deed and in thought, but not in word. There is an offence that originates in word and in thought, but not in deed. There is an offence that originates in deed and in word and in thought. These are the six (&c.) 7. ‘And what is that which gives rise to legal questions of business? There is one thing that gives rise to legal questions of business, that is to say, the Samgha. 1 Buddhaghosa has no explanation of these terms here, but on Anguttara Nikaya III, 2, 3, where the whole list recurs, he says (as Dr. Morris is good enough to inform us) that okosimako is - equal to lakuz/ako; and the same explanation is given by the commentary on Puggala IV, 19. Compare the use in English of ‘a mere dot of a man,’ in a similar sense. 3 These three epithets of the voice are no doubt intended to be the opposites of the three in Mahdvagga V, 13, 9. IV, 14,10. THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES. C 8. ‘Legal questions of dispute. Right. Wrong. Undetermined 1. ‘A legal question arising out of dispute may be right, and it may be wrong, and it may be undetermined. Of these, which is the legal question arising out of dispute which is right ? ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, the Bhikkhu of right mind discuss, saying, “ This is the Dhamma,” or “ This is not the Dhamma” (&c., as before, in § 2, down to) or “ This is not a most grave offence.” Whatsoever quarrel, strife, contention, difference of opinion, contradiction, opposition, cantankerousness, or contention there may be in such a discussion is called a legal question arising out of dispute that is right.’ [And so when the Bhikkhus have a wrong mind, or an undetermined mind, the legal question arising out of such dispute is respectively a legal question arising out of dispute that is wrong or undetermined. ] 9. ‘Legal questions of censure. Right. Wrong. Undetermined.’ [It may be either of the three, according as the Bhikkhus censuring (as in § 5) have a right, wrong, or an undetermined mind. The form of the paragraph corresponds to § 8 throughout.] 1o. ‘ Legal questions of offence. Right. Wrong. Undetermined. ‘There may be a legal question whether an offence is wrong, and there may be a legal question
3The form of the paragraph corresponds to § 8 throughout.] 1o. ‘ Legal questions of offence. Right. Wrong. Undetermined. ‘There may be a legal question whether an offence is wrong, and there may be a legal question 1 We have already pointed out (above, IV, 1, 2) that this mode of the commencement of a discussion by setting out a list of the points to be discussed and compared is found also in some of the Abhidhamma books. There it was only the objects themselves, here we have all the predicates which it is proposed to apply (as in § 8), or to declare inapplicable to the object (as in § 10), which are set out, but the principle is the same. UNIVGigGs 7 42 KULLAVAGGA. IV, 14, 11. whether an offence is undetermined. There is no legal question whether an offence be right. ‘Of these, which is a legal question whether an offence be wrong? Whatsoever transgression be committed knowingly, consciously, and deliberately, this is called a legal question whether an offence be wrong. ‘ And of these, which is a legal question whether an offence be undetermined ? Whatsoever transgression be committed not knowingly, not consciously, not deliberately, this is called a legal question whether an offence be undetermined. 11. ‘ Legal questions of business. Right. Wrong. Undetermined.’ [It may be all three, according as the Bhikkhus performing the business specified, as in 9 2, are rightminded, wrong-minded, or of undetermined mind. The form of the paragraph as in § 8 throughout.] 12. ‘ Disputes, legal questions arising out of disputes. Dispute which is no legal question. Legal question which is no dispute. Matter which is both legal question and dispute. ‘There may be a dispute which is a legal question of dispute. There may be a dispute which is no legal question. There may be such a legal question which is no dispute. There may be such a legal question and also a dispute. ‘Of these, which is the dispute which is a legal question of dispute requiring formal settlement ? In case Bhikkhus discuss, saying, “ This is Dhamma” [&c., as before, in § 2], or “ This is not a most grave offence.” Whatsoever quarrel, strife [&c., as in § 2] there may be on such a matter is a dispute which is a legal question of dispute requiring formal settlement. IV, 14,144 THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES. 43 ‘And of these, which is a dispute which is not a legal question requiring formal settlement? When a mother disputes with her son, or a son with his mother, or a father with his son, or a son with his father, or a brother with a brother, or a brother with a sister, or a sister with a brother, or a friend with a friend. Such adispute is not a legal question requiring formal settlement by the Samgha. ‘And of these, which is a legal question that is not a dispute? A legal question of censure, or a legal question of offence, or a legal question of business. This is a legal question which is not a dispute.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.