Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
11 Asana-pafifidpakam. This office is not mentioned in the other Khandhakas. We should expect to find it at Kullavagga VI, 21,2. The reason of this is that it is no office of authority. The different referees would take their seats in the order of their seniority, and all that the 4sana-paw#4paka would have to do would be to see that they were provided with everything they required (it was not much, chiefly mats or rugs to sit upon) in the hall or grove where they met. * Here, of course, consisting of the eight referees. XII, a, 8. ON THE COUNCIL OF VESALI. 409 ‘What, Sir, is this horn-salt-license ?’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, to carry about salt in a horn with the intention of putting it into food which has not been salted ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable.’ ‘Where was such a claim rejected ?’ ‘At SAvatthi, in the Sutta Vibhanga.’ ‘Of what offence is the person, who does so, guilty ?’ ‘Of Pa£ittiya, in eating food which has been put by 4’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This first point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast the first vote.’ ‘Is the two-inch-license, Lord, allowable ?’ ‘What, Sir, is this two-inch-license ?’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, to eat the midday meal beyond the right time, provided only that the shadow of the sun has not yet turned two inches ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable.’ ‘Where has such a claim been rejected ?’ ‘At Ragagaha, in the Sutta Vibhanga.’ ‘ Of what offence is he, who does so, guilty ?’ ‘Of Pafittiya, in eating at the wrong time ®.’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This second point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast the second vote.’ ‘Is the village-trip-license, Lord, allowable ?’ 1 Pakittiya XXXVIII. * Pakittiya XXXVIL. 410 : KULLAVAGGA. XTT, 2, 8. ‘What, Sir, is this village-trip-license ?’ ‘Is it allowable for one who has once finished his meal, and has refused any more, to eat food which has not been left over, on the ground that he is about to proceed into the village ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable.’ ‘Where was such a claim rejected ?’ ‘At SAvatthi, in the Sutta Vibhanga.’ ‘Of what offence is he, who does so, guilty ?’ ‘Of Pakittiya, in eating food which has not been left over?’ . ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This third point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast the third vote.’ ‘Is the circuit-license, Lord, allowable ?’ ‘What, Sir, is this circuit-license ?’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, for a number of Bhikkhus who dwell within the same circuit, within the same boundary, to hold separate Uposathas ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable, ‘Where was such a claim rejected ?’
2‘At Ragagaha, in the Uposatha Samyutta*®’ ‘ Of what offence is he, who does so, guilty ?’ ‘Of Dukkada, in neglecting the Vinaya.’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This fourth point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast the fourth vote.’ 1 Pékittiya XXXV. ? Samyutta must here be used for Khandhaka. The passage referred to is Mah4vagga II (the Uposatha Khandhaka), 8, 3. XII, 2, 8 ON THE COUNCIL OF VESALf. All” ‘Is the indemnity-license, Lord, allowable ?’ ‘What, Sir, is this indemnity-license ?’ ‘Ts it allowable, Lord, for a Samgha which is not legally constituted to perform an official act, on the ground that they will afterwards obtain the sanction of such Bhikkhus as subsequently arrive ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable.’ ‘ Where was such a claim rejected ?’ ‘In the Kampeyyaka section, in the body of the Vinaya 1, ‘ Of what offence is he, who does so, guilty ?’ ‘ Of Dukkadéa, in neglecting the Vinaya.’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This fifth point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast this fifth vote.’ ‘Is the precedent-license, Lord, allowable ?’ ‘What, Sir, is this precedent-license ?’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, to do a thing on the ground that “ My preceptor (upagg4ya) has practised this,” or “ My teacher (A4ariya) has practised that ?”’ ‘In some cases, Sir, it is allowable, and in some not?’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This sixth point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast this sixth vote.’ ‘Is the churn-license, Lord, allowable?’ ‘What, Sir, is this churn-license?’ * Vinaya-vatthu. Here used as a title, apparently of the Khandhakas. The passage referred to is in the Kampeyyaka Khandhaka (Mahavagga IX, 3, 5). 3 See the note above on XII, 1, 10. - 412 KULLAVAGGA. XI, 2, 8. ‘Is it allowable, Lord, for one who has once finished his meal, and has refused any more, to drink milk not left over from the meal, on the ground that it has left the condition of milk and has not yet reached the condition of curds ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable. ‘Where was such a claim rejected ?’ ‘ At SAvatthi, in the Sutta Vibhanga. ‘ Of what offence is he, who does so, guilty ?’ ‘Of Pé£ittiya, in eating food which has not been left over?’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This seventh point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast this seventh vote.’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, to drink toddy?’ ‘What, Sir, is this toddy?’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, to drink spirits which have not yet become spirits and have not yet acquired intoxicating properties ?’
3Thus do I cast this seventh vote.’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, to drink toddy?’ ‘What, Sir, is this toddy?’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, to drink spirits which have not yet become spirits and have not yet acquired intoxicating properties ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable.’ ‘Where was it rejected ?’ ‘At Kosambi, in the Sutta Vibhanga.’ ‘Of what offence is he, who does so, guilty?’ ‘ Of Paéittiya, in the drinking of fermented liquors and strong drink 2.’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. The eighth point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast this eighth vote.’ ) Pakittiya XXXV. * P&kittiya LI. XII, 2, 8. ON THE COUNCIL OF VESALT. 413 ‘Is the unfringed-seat, Lord, allowable? ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable. ‘Where has it been rejected ?’ ‘At Savatthi, in the Sutta Vibhanga.’ ‘Of what offence is he, who uses such a seat, guilty ?’ ‘Of Pa£ittiya, in using a thing which ought to be cut down (to the proper size) 2.’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This ninth point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and _ false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast this ninth vote.’ ‘Is gold and silver, Lord, allowable ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable.’ ‘Where was it forbidden ?’ ‘At Ragagaha, in the Sutta Vibhanga.’ ‘ Of what offence is he, who takes it, guilty ?’ ‘Of Paéittiya, in accepting gold and silver 8.’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This tenth point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast this tenth vote.’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. These ten points, having been examined into by the Samgha, have been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master.’ 1 That is, does the fact of its being unfringed make legal a mat or rug otherwise illegal by reason of its size? See above, XII, 1, ro. * Pakittiya LXXXIX. * The 18th Nissaggiya Pasittiya. 414 EULLAVAGGA, XII, 2, 9. ‘1 This legal question, Sir, has been concluded ; and being settled, it is settled once for all. Nevertheless, Sir, do you question me on these ten points in the midst also of the Samgha %, in order to persuade those Bhikkhus *,’ So the venerable Revata questioned the venerable Sabbak4mi on the ten points also in the midst of the Samgha, and as he was questioned on one after the other, the venerable Sabbak4mi gave reply. 9. Now whereas at this rehearsal of the Vinaya seven hundred Bhikkhus, without one more, without one being wanting, took part, therefore is that rehearsal of the Vinaya called ° That of the seven hundred *. Here ends the Twelfth Khandhaka, on the Rehearsal by the Seven Hundred. 1 It is clear from the word tvam Avuso, that Sabbak4mf is here addressing Revata.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
11 Asana-pafifidpakam. This office is not mentioned in the other Khandhakas. We should expect to find it at Kullavagga VI, 21,2. The reason of this is that it is no office of authority. The different referees would take their seats in the order of their seniority, and all that the 4sana-paw#4paka would have to do would be to see that they were provided with everything they required (it was not much, chiefly mats or rugs to sit upon) in the hall or grove where they met. * Here, of course, consisting of the eight referees. XII, a, 8. ON THE COUNCIL OF VESALI. 409 ‘What, Sir, is this horn-salt-license ?’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, to carry about salt in a horn with the intention of putting it into food which has not been salted ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable.’ ‘Where was such a claim rejected ?’ ‘At SAvatthi, in the Sutta Vibhanga.’ ‘Of what offence is the person, who does so, guilty ?’ ‘Of Pa£ittiya, in eating food which has been put by 4’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This first point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast the first vote.’ ‘Is the two-inch-license, Lord, allowable ?’ ‘What, Sir, is this two-inch-license ?’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, to eat the midday meal beyond the right time, provided only that the shadow of the sun has not yet turned two inches ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable.’ ‘Where has such a claim been rejected ?’ ‘At Ragagaha, in the Sutta Vibhanga.’ ‘ Of what offence is he, who does so, guilty ?’ ‘Of Pafittiya, in eating at the wrong time ®.’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This second point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast the second vote.’ ‘Is the village-trip-license, Lord, allowable ?’ 1 Pakittiya XXXVIII. * Pakittiya XXXVIL. 410 : KULLAVAGGA. XTT, 2, 8. ‘What, Sir, is this village-trip-license ?’ ‘Is it allowable for one who has once finished his meal, and has refused any more, to eat food which has not been left over, on the ground that he is about to proceed into the village ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable.’ ‘Where was such a claim rejected ?’ ‘At SAvatthi, in the Sutta Vibhanga.’ ‘Of what offence is he, who does so, guilty ?’ ‘Of Pakittiya, in eating food which has not been left over?’ . ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This third point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast the third vote.’ ‘Is the circuit-license, Lord, allowable ?’ ‘What, Sir, is this circuit-license ?’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, for a number of Bhikkhus who dwell within the same circuit, within the same boundary, to hold separate Uposathas ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable, ‘Where was such a claim rejected ?’
2‘At Ragagaha, in the Uposatha Samyutta*®’ ‘ Of what offence is he, who does so, guilty ?’ ‘Of Dukkada, in neglecting the Vinaya.’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This fourth point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast the fourth vote.’ 1 Pékittiya XXXV. ? Samyutta must here be used for Khandhaka. The passage referred to is Mah4vagga II (the Uposatha Khandhaka), 8, 3. XII, 2, 8 ON THE COUNCIL OF VESALf. All” ‘Is the indemnity-license, Lord, allowable ?’ ‘What, Sir, is this indemnity-license ?’ ‘Ts it allowable, Lord, for a Samgha which is not legally constituted to perform an official act, on the ground that they will afterwards obtain the sanction of such Bhikkhus as subsequently arrive ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable.’ ‘ Where was such a claim rejected ?’ ‘In the Kampeyyaka section, in the body of the Vinaya 1, ‘ Of what offence is he, who does so, guilty ?’ ‘ Of Dukkadéa, in neglecting the Vinaya.’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This fifth point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast this fifth vote.’ ‘Is the precedent-license, Lord, allowable ?’ ‘What, Sir, is this precedent-license ?’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, to do a thing on the ground that “ My preceptor (upagg4ya) has practised this,” or “ My teacher (A4ariya) has practised that ?”’ ‘In some cases, Sir, it is allowable, and in some not?’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This sixth point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast this sixth vote.’ ‘Is the churn-license, Lord, allowable?’ ‘What, Sir, is this churn-license?’ * Vinaya-vatthu. Here used as a title, apparently of the Khandhakas. The passage referred to is in the Kampeyyaka Khandhaka (Mahavagga IX, 3, 5). 3 See the note above on XII, 1, 10. - 412 KULLAVAGGA. XI, 2, 8. ‘Is it allowable, Lord, for one who has once finished his meal, and has refused any more, to drink milk not left over from the meal, on the ground that it has left the condition of milk and has not yet reached the condition of curds ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable. ‘Where was such a claim rejected ?’ ‘ At SAvatthi, in the Sutta Vibhanga. ‘ Of what offence is he, who does so, guilty ?’ ‘Of Pé£ittiya, in eating food which has not been left over?’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This seventh point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast this seventh vote.’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, to drink toddy?’ ‘What, Sir, is this toddy?’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, to drink spirits which have not yet become spirits and have not yet acquired intoxicating properties ?’
3Thus do I cast this seventh vote.’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, to drink toddy?’ ‘What, Sir, is this toddy?’ ‘Is it allowable, Lord, to drink spirits which have not yet become spirits and have not yet acquired intoxicating properties ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable.’ ‘Where was it rejected ?’ ‘At Kosambi, in the Sutta Vibhanga.’ ‘Of what offence is he, who does so, guilty?’ ‘ Of Paéittiya, in the drinking of fermented liquors and strong drink 2.’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. The eighth point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast this eighth vote.’ ) Pakittiya XXXV. * P&kittiya LI. XII, 2, 8. ON THE COUNCIL OF VESALT. 413 ‘Is the unfringed-seat, Lord, allowable? ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable. ‘Where has it been rejected ?’ ‘At Savatthi, in the Sutta Vibhanga.’ ‘Of what offence is he, who uses such a seat, guilty ?’ ‘Of Pa£ittiya, in using a thing which ought to be cut down (to the proper size) 2.’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This ninth point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and _ false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast this ninth vote.’ ‘Is gold and silver, Lord, allowable ?’ ‘No, Sir, it is not allowable.’ ‘Where was it forbidden ?’ ‘At Ragagaha, in the Sutta Vibhanga.’ ‘ Of what offence is he, who takes it, guilty ?’ ‘Of Paéittiya, in accepting gold and silver 8.’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. This tenth point, having been examined into by the Samgha, has been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master. Thus do I cast this tenth vote.’ ‘Let the venerable Samgha hear me. These ten points, having been examined into by the Samgha, have been found to be false Dhamma and false Vinaya, and not contained in the teaching of the Master.’ 1 That is, does the fact of its being unfringed make legal a mat or rug otherwise illegal by reason of its size? See above, XII, 1, ro. * Pakittiya LXXXIX. * The 18th Nissaggiya Pasittiya. 414 EULLAVAGGA, XII, 2, 9. ‘1 This legal question, Sir, has been concluded ; and being settled, it is settled once for all. Nevertheless, Sir, do you question me on these ten points in the midst also of the Samgha %, in order to persuade those Bhikkhus *,’ So the venerable Revata questioned the venerable Sabbak4mi on the ten points also in the midst of the Samgha, and as he was questioned on one after the other, the venerable Sabbak4mi gave reply. 9. Now whereas at this rehearsal of the Vinaya seven hundred Bhikkhus, without one more, without one being wanting, took part, therefore is that rehearsal of the Vinaya called ° That of the seven hundred *. Here ends the Twelfth Khandhaka, on the Rehearsal by the Seven Hundred. 1 It is clear from the word tvam Avuso, that Sabbak4mf is here addressing Revata.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.