Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1When one inhibits the Patimokkha for a breach of morality without ground. This is the one kind, &c. ‘And which is the one kind of inhibition of the Patimokkha which is legal ?. When one inhibits the Patimokkha for a breach of morality with good ground. This is the one kind, &c. ‘And which are the two kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are illegal? When one inhibits the Patimokkha for a breach of morality, or for an offence against conduct, and each of them without ground. These are the two kinds, &c. ‘And which are the two kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are legal? When one inhibits the Patimokkha for a breach of morality, and for an offence against conduct, and each of them with good ‘ground. These are the two kinds, &c. ‘And which are the three kinds, &c.? [as the last two, adding “ offence against doctrine.” ] ‘And which are the four kinds, &c.? [as the last, adding “ offence against the right mode of livelihood.”7 ‘ And which are the five kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are illegal? When one inhibits the Patimokkha for a Paragika, or for a Samghadisesa, or for a P4&ittiya, or for a PA¢idesantya, or for a Dukka?¢a, and each of them without ground, These are the five kinds, &c. ‘ And which are the five kinds of inhibition of the IX, 3, 3+ ON EXCLUSION FROM THE PATIMOKKHA. 309 Patimokkha which are legal? [Same as. the last, “ with good ground.” ‘And which are the six kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are illegal ? When one inhibits the Patimokkha for an offence against morality... . conduct .... doctrine’. . . . without ground, the offence being one of omission—when one inhibits the Patimokkha for an offence against morality... . conduct .... doctrine .... without ground, the offence being one of commission?. These are the six, &c. ‘And which are the six kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are legal? [Same as the last, “with good ground.”’] ‘And which are the seven kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are illegal? When one inhibits the Pétimokkha for a PardAgika, or for a Samghadisesa, or for a Thullaé#éaya, or for a Pa&ittiya, or for a-PA¢idesantya, or for a Dukkaa, or for a DubbhAsita, and each of them without ground. These are the seven kinds, &c. ‘And which are the seven kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are legal? [Same as the last, “ with good ground.” ] ‘And which are the eight kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are illegal? [The same as the six, adding “ offence against the right means of livelihood.”] 1 The paragraph is repeated in the section full for each of these cases. 2Kata....akat&....kat&kat& we have rendered here and below as offence of omission—of commission—of both, as seems imperatively demanded by the context. Buddhaghosa, however, says, AkatAy4 ti tena puggalena s4 vipatti kata va hotu akaté v4 p4timokkha-/Aapanakassa safiid am(lika-vasena am(lik4 hoti. Katakat4y4 ti kata ka akatawt 4a ubhayam gahetva vuttam.
2Buddhaghosa, however, says, AkatAy4 ti tena puggalena s4 vipatti kata va hotu akaté v4 p4timokkha-/Aapanakassa safiid am(lika-vasena am(lik4 hoti. Katakat4y4 ti kata ka akatawt 4a ubhayam gahetva vuttam. 310 KULLAVAGGA. IX, 3, 3. ‘And which are the nine kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are illegal .... legal? [The same as the six, adding for each kind of offence, “the offence being one both of omission and of commission.”’] ‘And which are the ten kinds of inhibition of the P&atimokkha which are illegal? When (a Bhikkhu) who has been guilty of a Paragika is not seated in that assembly ',—when no discussion is still going on (in the assembly) as to a P4rdgika offence (supposed to have been committed by a Bhikkhu then present)—when (a Bhikkhu) who has abandoned the precepts? is not seated in that assembly,—when no discussion is still going on (in the assembly) in respect of (a Bhikkhu then present having been charged with) abandoning the precepts,—when (the person charged) submits himself to the legally prescribed concord (of the assembly) §, —when (the person charged) does not withdraw his acceptance of the legally prescribed concord (of the assembly) *,—when no discussion is still going on (in the assembly) in respect of the withdrawal of (any member's) acceptance of the legally (prescribed) concord (of the assembly)—when (the Bhikkhu charged) has not been suspected of an offence against morality, nor seen (to have committed one), nor heard (to have committed one)— . of an offence against conduct —.... of an ? This and the following phrase are further enlarged upon in § 4 and the following sections. ? See our note on Mahavagga II, 22, 3. 5 See Mahfvagga X, 5, 13, &c. * Pakkadiyati. Buddhaghosa says here, pakAadtyatt ti ti puna katabbam kammam pakédadiyati. Tena ukkosanake pétittiyam apaggati. TX, 3,4. ON EXCLUSION FROM THE PATIMOKKHA. 311 offence against doctrine. .... These are the ten kinds, &c. ‘And which are the ten kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are legal? [The same as the last, positive instead of negative.] 4. ‘And how (can it be legally said that) a Bhikkhu who has been guilty of a Paragika offence is seated in the assembly ? ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu sees that (another) Bhikkhu is incurring a PAérdgika offence by those means, marks, and signs by which the incurring of a Paragika offence is brought about. Or in case a Bhikkhu does not himself see that (another) Bhikkhu is incurring a Paragika offence, but another Bhikkhu inform the (first-mentioned) Bhikkhu, saying, “Such and such a Bhikkhu, Sir, has been guilty of a Paragika offence.” Or in case a Bhikkhu does not himself see that another Bhikkhu is incurring a P4ragika offence, but that one himself inform the (first-mentioned) Bhikkhu, saying, “T, Sir, have been guilty of a Paragika offence.”
3‘(In either of these cases), O Bhikkhus, if he seem to do so, the Bhikkhu may, on the ground of what he has seen and heard and suspected, bring forward the following resolution on an Uposatha day, on the fourteenth or fifteenth day of the month, at a time when that individual is present in the midst of - the Samgha: “Let the venerable Samgha hear me. Such and such an individual has been guilty of a Péragika offence. I interdict for him the Patimokkha, to the effect that the Patimokkha ought not to be recited at a time when he is present.” That is a legal inhibition of the Patimokkha. ‘If, when the Patimokkha has been inhibited for 312 KULLAVAGGA. IX, 3, 5- that Bhikkhu, the assembly should rise on account of any one or other of the Ten Dangers '—danger arising from the king, or from thieves, or from fire, or from water, or from human beings, or from nonhuman beings, or from beasts of prey, or from creeping things, or danger of life, or danger against chastity—the Bhikkhu may, if he desire to do so, bring forward the following resolution, either in that circle of residence or in another circle of residence, at a time when that individual is present in the midst of the assembly: “ Let the venerable Samgha hear me. A discussion had commenced with regard to. a Paragika offence of such and. such a person, but that matter was not decided. If the time seems meet to the Samgha, let the Samgha decide that matter.” If he thus succeed, it is well. If not, then on an Uposatha day, on the fourteenth or fifteenth day of the month, at a time when that individual is present in the midst of the Samgha, let him bring forward the following resolution: “Let the venerable Samgha hear me. A discussion had commenced with regard to a P4rdgika offence of such and such a person, but that matter was not decided. I interdict the Patimokkha for him to the effect that the Patimokkha ought not to be recited at a time when he is present.” That is a legal inhibition of the Patimokkha. 5. ‘And how (can it be legally said that a Bhikkhu) who has abandoned the precepts is seated in the assembly?’ [The same as last, reading ‘abandoned the precepts,’ &c., for ‘ Péragika offence,’ &c.] 6. ‘And how (can it be legally said that the person 1 See the rule laid down in Mah&vagga II, 15, 4. IX, 4,1. ON EXCLUSION FROM THE PATIMOKKHA. 313 charged) does not submit himself to the legally (prescribed) concord (of the assembly) ?’ [Same as last, reading ‘not submit himself to the legally (prescribed) concord of the assembly,’ &c., instead of ‘abandon the precepts,’ &c.] 7. ‘And how (can it be legally said that the person charged) withdraws his acceptance of the legally (established) concord (of the assembly) ?’ [Same as last, reading ‘withdraws his acceptance, &c., for ‘does not submit,’ &c.]
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1When one inhibits the Patimokkha for a breach of morality without ground. This is the one kind, &c. ‘And which is the one kind of inhibition of the Patimokkha which is legal ?. When one inhibits the Patimokkha for a breach of morality with good ground. This is the one kind, &c. ‘And which are the two kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are illegal? When one inhibits the Patimokkha for a breach of morality, or for an offence against conduct, and each of them without ground. These are the two kinds, &c. ‘And which are the two kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are legal? When one inhibits the Patimokkha for a breach of morality, and for an offence against conduct, and each of them with good ‘ground. These are the two kinds, &c. ‘And which are the three kinds, &c.? [as the last two, adding “ offence against doctrine.” ] ‘And which are the four kinds, &c.? [as the last, adding “ offence against the right mode of livelihood.”7 ‘ And which are the five kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are illegal? When one inhibits the Patimokkha for a Paragika, or for a Samghadisesa, or for a P4&ittiya, or for a PA¢idesantya, or for a Dukka?¢a, and each of them without ground, These are the five kinds, &c. ‘ And which are the five kinds of inhibition of the IX, 3, 3+ ON EXCLUSION FROM THE PATIMOKKHA. 309 Patimokkha which are legal? [Same as. the last, “ with good ground.” ‘And which are the six kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are illegal ? When one inhibits the Patimokkha for an offence against morality... . conduct .... doctrine’. . . . without ground, the offence being one of omission—when one inhibits the Patimokkha for an offence against morality... . conduct .... doctrine .... without ground, the offence being one of commission?. These are the six, &c. ‘And which are the six kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are legal? [Same as the last, “with good ground.”’] ‘And which are the seven kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are illegal? When one inhibits the Pétimokkha for a PardAgika, or for a Samghadisesa, or for a Thullaé#éaya, or for a Pa&ittiya, or for a-PA¢idesantya, or for a Dukkaa, or for a DubbhAsita, and each of them without ground. These are the seven kinds, &c. ‘And which are the seven kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are legal? [Same as the last, “ with good ground.” ] ‘And which are the eight kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are illegal? [The same as the six, adding “ offence against the right means of livelihood.”] 1 The paragraph is repeated in the section full for each of these cases. 2Kata....akat&....kat&kat& we have rendered here and below as offence of omission—of commission—of both, as seems imperatively demanded by the context. Buddhaghosa, however, says, AkatAy4 ti tena puggalena s4 vipatti kata va hotu akaté v4 p4timokkha-/Aapanakassa safiid am(lika-vasena am(lik4 hoti. Katakat4y4 ti kata ka akatawt 4a ubhayam gahetva vuttam.
2Buddhaghosa, however, says, AkatAy4 ti tena puggalena s4 vipatti kata va hotu akaté v4 p4timokkha-/Aapanakassa safiid am(lika-vasena am(lik4 hoti. Katakat4y4 ti kata ka akatawt 4a ubhayam gahetva vuttam. 310 KULLAVAGGA. IX, 3, 3. ‘And which are the nine kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are illegal .... legal? [The same as the six, adding for each kind of offence, “the offence being one both of omission and of commission.”’] ‘And which are the ten kinds of inhibition of the P&atimokkha which are illegal? When (a Bhikkhu) who has been guilty of a Paragika is not seated in that assembly ',—when no discussion is still going on (in the assembly) as to a P4rdgika offence (supposed to have been committed by a Bhikkhu then present)—when (a Bhikkhu) who has abandoned the precepts? is not seated in that assembly,—when no discussion is still going on (in the assembly) in respect of (a Bhikkhu then present having been charged with) abandoning the precepts,—when (the person charged) submits himself to the legally prescribed concord (of the assembly) §, —when (the person charged) does not withdraw his acceptance of the legally prescribed concord (of the assembly) *,—when no discussion is still going on (in the assembly) in respect of the withdrawal of (any member's) acceptance of the legally (prescribed) concord (of the assembly)—when (the Bhikkhu charged) has not been suspected of an offence against morality, nor seen (to have committed one), nor heard (to have committed one)— . of an offence against conduct —.... of an ? This and the following phrase are further enlarged upon in § 4 and the following sections. ? See our note on Mahavagga II, 22, 3. 5 See Mahfvagga X, 5, 13, &c. * Pakkadiyati. Buddhaghosa says here, pakAadtyatt ti ti puna katabbam kammam pakédadiyati. Tena ukkosanake pétittiyam apaggati. TX, 3,4. ON EXCLUSION FROM THE PATIMOKKHA. 311 offence against doctrine. .... These are the ten kinds, &c. ‘And which are the ten kinds of inhibition of the Patimokkha which are legal? [The same as the last, positive instead of negative.] 4. ‘And how (can it be legally said that) a Bhikkhu who has been guilty of a Paragika offence is seated in the assembly ? ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu sees that (another) Bhikkhu is incurring a PAérdgika offence by those means, marks, and signs by which the incurring of a Paragika offence is brought about. Or in case a Bhikkhu does not himself see that (another) Bhikkhu is incurring a Paragika offence, but another Bhikkhu inform the (first-mentioned) Bhikkhu, saying, “Such and such a Bhikkhu, Sir, has been guilty of a Paragika offence.” Or in case a Bhikkhu does not himself see that another Bhikkhu is incurring a P4ragika offence, but that one himself inform the (first-mentioned) Bhikkhu, saying, “T, Sir, have been guilty of a Paragika offence.”
3‘(In either of these cases), O Bhikkhus, if he seem to do so, the Bhikkhu may, on the ground of what he has seen and heard and suspected, bring forward the following resolution on an Uposatha day, on the fourteenth or fifteenth day of the month, at a time when that individual is present in the midst of - the Samgha: “Let the venerable Samgha hear me. Such and such an individual has been guilty of a Péragika offence. I interdict for him the Patimokkha, to the effect that the Patimokkha ought not to be recited at a time when he is present.” That is a legal inhibition of the Patimokkha. ‘If, when the Patimokkha has been inhibited for 312 KULLAVAGGA. IX, 3, 5- that Bhikkhu, the assembly should rise on account of any one or other of the Ten Dangers '—danger arising from the king, or from thieves, or from fire, or from water, or from human beings, or from nonhuman beings, or from beasts of prey, or from creeping things, or danger of life, or danger against chastity—the Bhikkhu may, if he desire to do so, bring forward the following resolution, either in that circle of residence or in another circle of residence, at a time when that individual is present in the midst of the assembly: “ Let the venerable Samgha hear me. A discussion had commenced with regard to. a Paragika offence of such and. such a person, but that matter was not decided. If the time seems meet to the Samgha, let the Samgha decide that matter.” If he thus succeed, it is well. If not, then on an Uposatha day, on the fourteenth or fifteenth day of the month, at a time when that individual is present in the midst of the Samgha, let him bring forward the following resolution: “Let the venerable Samgha hear me. A discussion had commenced with regard to a P4rdgika offence of such and such a person, but that matter was not decided. I interdict the Patimokkha for him to the effect that the Patimokkha ought not to be recited at a time when he is present.” That is a legal inhibition of the Patimokkha. 5. ‘And how (can it be legally said that a Bhikkhu) who has abandoned the precepts is seated in the assembly?’ [The same as last, reading ‘abandoned the precepts,’ &c., for ‘ Péragika offence,’ &c.] 6. ‘And how (can it be legally said that the person 1 See the rule laid down in Mah&vagga II, 15, 4. IX, 4,1. ON EXCLUSION FROM THE PATIMOKKHA. 313 charged) does not submit himself to the legally (prescribed) concord (of the assembly) ?’ [Same as last, reading ‘not submit himself to the legally (prescribed) concord of the assembly,’ &c., instead of ‘abandon the precepts,’ &c.] 7. ‘And how (can it be legally said that the person charged) withdraws his acceptance of the legally (established) concord (of the assembly) ?’ [Same as last, reading ‘withdraws his acceptance, &c., for ‘does not submit,’ &c.]
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.