Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1? On the opposition of vavatthita and sambhinna, compare Minayeff Patimokkha, p. 29, where these two expressions are used of language. * The chapter is translated as it stands. To supply the implications involved, the words ‘a Bhikkhu’ at the beginning should be understood as ‘a Bhikkhu undergoing probation, or liable to the Manatta discipline, or undergoing the Manatta discipline, or fit to be rehabilitated.’ And the conclusion should be supplied as in chap. 28, except that the penalty in each case is not an additional probation, but a probation corresponding in length to the period which has elapsed since the first of those offences which the re-ordained Bhikkhu has concealed (either before or after the second ordination). The details are only worked out, in chap. 28, of the first of the several pairs here enumerated, and are intended to be supplied here for each of the other pairs in a similar way. All ° the pairs recur in chaps. 35, 36. 432 ‘ KULLAVAGGA. IIT, 34, 1. 34, 1. ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghédisesa offence, and as touching that SamghAdisesa offence they are of opinion that it is a Samghadisesa offence?. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. He who has concealed it should be compelled to confess himself guilty of a dukkaZa_ offence, and a probation corresponding to the period during which he has concealed it having been imposed upon him, a Manatta should be imposed upon them both. ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghadisesa offence, and as touching that Samgh4disesa offence they are in doubt.. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. [The penalty is the same. ]? ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghadisesa offence, and as touching that Samghdadisesa offence they are of opinion that it is a mixed offence*. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. [The penalty is the same.]? ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a mixed offence, and as touching that mixed offence they are of opinion that it is a Samghadisesa offence. One of 1 Compare chap. 23, § 4. 2 The concluding words of the last paragraph are here repeated. * The Samanta Pasddika says, Missakan ti thullatéayAdfhi missitam; that is an act which involves not only a Samghadisesa, but also some one or other of the lesser offences. Compare the use of missaka at Gataka II, 420, 433, and at Maha-parinibbana Sutta, ed. Childers, p. 22. IIT, 34, 2. PROBATION AND PENANCE. 433 them conceals, the other does not conceal it. [The penalty is the same.]? , ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a mixed offence, and as touching that mixed offence they are of opinion that it is a mixed offence. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. [The penalty is the same. ]
2433 them conceals, the other does not conceal it. [The penalty is the same.]? , ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a mixed offence, and as touching that mixed offence they are of opinion that it is a mixed offence. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. [The penalty is the same. ] ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a minor offence?; and as regarding that minor offence they are of opinion that it is a SamghAdisesa offence. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. He who has concealed it should be compelled to confess himself guilty of a dukkaZa offence, and both of them should be dealt with according to law. ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a minor offence, and as touching that minor offence they are of opinion that it is a minor offence. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. He who has concealed it should be compelled to confess himself guilty of a dukka¢a offence, and both of them should be dealt with according to law. 2. ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samgh4disesa offence, and as touching that Samghddisesa offence they are of opinion that it is a SamghAdisesa. One of them thinks: “I will tell (the Samgha of it).” The other thinks: “I will not tell (the Samgha of it);” and during the first watch of the night he conceals it, and during the second watch of the night he conceals 1 The concluding words of the last paragraph are here repeated. * That is, any offence less than a Samghadisesa. The Samanta Pasfdika says, Suddhakan ti Samghddisesam vin4 lahuk4pattikkhandham eva, : (17] Ff 434 KULLAVAGGA. TI, 34, 2. it, and during the third watch of the night he conceals it. After the sun has arisen the offence is a concealed one. He who has concealed it [&c.; the penalty is the same as in section 1, paragraph 1]. ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghadisesa offence, and as touching that Samgh4disesa offence they are of opinion that it is a Samghdadisesa offence. They set out, intending to tell (the Samgha of it). On the way there springs up in one of them a desire to conceal it; and during the first watch of the night he conceals it, and during the second watch of the night he conceals it, and during the third watch of the night he conceals it. After the sun has arisen the offence is a concealed one. He who has concealed it [&c.; the penalty is the same as before]. . ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghadisesa offence, and as touching that Samghddisesa offence they are of opinion that it is a Samgh4disesa offence. They go out of their mind; and afterwards when they have recovered their senses one of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. He who has concealed it [&c.; the penalty is the same as before].
3They go out of their mind; and afterwards when they have recovered their senses one of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. He who has concealed it [&c.; the penalty is the same as before]. ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghadisesa offence. When the Patimokkha is being recited they say thus: “ Now do we come to perceive it; for this rule they say has been handed down in the Suttas, is contained in the Suttas, and comes into recitation every half month.” As touching that Samghadisesa offence, they (thus) come to be of * It is probably to be understood that a like rule is to apply in the other similar cases mentioned in the last paragraph of chap. 32. ID, 35, 1 PROBATION AND PENANCE. 435 opinion that it is a Samgh4disesa offence. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. He who has concealed it [&c.; the penalty is the same as before}. 35. 1. ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu is guilty of a number of Samghddisesa offences—definite, and not definite—of one designation, and of various designations—similar to each other, and dissimilar —connected with each other, and disconnected’. He asks the Samgha for an inclusive probation on account of those offences?» The Samgha imposes upon him an inclusive probation on account of those offences. He undergoing that probation is guilty meanwhile of a number of SamghAdisesa offences, definite ones, which he does not conceal. He asks the Samgha to throw him back on account of those intervening offences to the commencement (of his term of probation). The Samgha [does so] by a lawful proceeding that cannot be quashed, and fit 1 See chap. 33 for this list. ; * In accordance with the rule laid down in chap. 28, which shows that by ‘a Bhikkhu’ must be understood ‘a Bhikkhu who is under probation ;’ and the offences he has committed must have been concealed by him. * Akuppa. The technical trm kammam kopeti is not to revoke the valid decision of a kamma regularly held, but to show that the kamma by reason of some irregularity was no real kamma, and its whole proceedings therefore void. One may compare akupp4& me eto-vimutti spoken by the Buddha immediately after he had attained Nirvaza under the Bo Tree (Ariyapariyosina Sutta in H. O.’s ‘Buddha,’ p. 429) and the opposite idea in Sutta Nipata IV, 3, 5. Ff 2 436 KULLAVAGGA. II, 35, 2. for the occasion; and it also imposes a MAnatta upon him, but by an unlawful proceeding, and then by an unlawful proceeding rehabilitates him. That Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, is not purified from those offences.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1? On the opposition of vavatthita and sambhinna, compare Minayeff Patimokkha, p. 29, where these two expressions are used of language. * The chapter is translated as it stands. To supply the implications involved, the words ‘a Bhikkhu’ at the beginning should be understood as ‘a Bhikkhu undergoing probation, or liable to the Manatta discipline, or undergoing the Manatta discipline, or fit to be rehabilitated.’ And the conclusion should be supplied as in chap. 28, except that the penalty in each case is not an additional probation, but a probation corresponding in length to the period which has elapsed since the first of those offences which the re-ordained Bhikkhu has concealed (either before or after the second ordination). The details are only worked out, in chap. 28, of the first of the several pairs here enumerated, and are intended to be supplied here for each of the other pairs in a similar way. All ° the pairs recur in chaps. 35, 36. 432 ‘ KULLAVAGGA. IIT, 34, 1. 34, 1. ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghédisesa offence, and as touching that SamghAdisesa offence they are of opinion that it is a Samghadisesa offence?. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. He who has concealed it should be compelled to confess himself guilty of a dukkaZa_ offence, and a probation corresponding to the period during which he has concealed it having been imposed upon him, a Manatta should be imposed upon them both. ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghadisesa offence, and as touching that Samgh4disesa offence they are in doubt.. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. [The penalty is the same. ]? ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghadisesa offence, and as touching that Samghdadisesa offence they are of opinion that it is a mixed offence*. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. [The penalty is the same.]? ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a mixed offence, and as touching that mixed offence they are of opinion that it is a Samghadisesa offence. One of 1 Compare chap. 23, § 4. 2 The concluding words of the last paragraph are here repeated. * The Samanta Pasddika says, Missakan ti thullatéayAdfhi missitam; that is an act which involves not only a Samghadisesa, but also some one or other of the lesser offences. Compare the use of missaka at Gataka II, 420, 433, and at Maha-parinibbana Sutta, ed. Childers, p. 22. IIT, 34, 2. PROBATION AND PENANCE. 433 them conceals, the other does not conceal it. [The penalty is the same.]? , ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a mixed offence, and as touching that mixed offence they are of opinion that it is a mixed offence. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. [The penalty is the same. ]
2433 them conceals, the other does not conceal it. [The penalty is the same.]? , ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a mixed offence, and as touching that mixed offence they are of opinion that it is a mixed offence. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. [The penalty is the same. ] ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a minor offence?; and as regarding that minor offence they are of opinion that it is a SamghAdisesa offence. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. He who has concealed it should be compelled to confess himself guilty of a dukkaZa offence, and both of them should be dealt with according to law. ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a minor offence, and as touching that minor offence they are of opinion that it is a minor offence. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. He who has concealed it should be compelled to confess himself guilty of a dukka¢a offence, and both of them should be dealt with according to law. 2. ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samgh4disesa offence, and as touching that Samghddisesa offence they are of opinion that it is a SamghAdisesa. One of them thinks: “I will tell (the Samgha of it).” The other thinks: “I will not tell (the Samgha of it);” and during the first watch of the night he conceals it, and during the second watch of the night he conceals 1 The concluding words of the last paragraph are here repeated. * That is, any offence less than a Samghadisesa. The Samanta Pasfdika says, Suddhakan ti Samghddisesam vin4 lahuk4pattikkhandham eva, : (17] Ff 434 KULLAVAGGA. TI, 34, 2. it, and during the third watch of the night he conceals it. After the sun has arisen the offence is a concealed one. He who has concealed it [&c.; the penalty is the same as in section 1, paragraph 1]. ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghadisesa offence, and as touching that Samgh4disesa offence they are of opinion that it is a Samghdadisesa offence. They set out, intending to tell (the Samgha of it). On the way there springs up in one of them a desire to conceal it; and during the first watch of the night he conceals it, and during the second watch of the night he conceals it, and during the third watch of the night he conceals it. After the sun has arisen the offence is a concealed one. He who has concealed it [&c.; the penalty is the same as before]. . ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghadisesa offence, and as touching that Samghddisesa offence they are of opinion that it is a Samgh4disesa offence. They go out of their mind; and afterwards when they have recovered their senses one of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. He who has concealed it [&c.; the penalty is the same as before].
3They go out of their mind; and afterwards when they have recovered their senses one of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. He who has concealed it [&c.; the penalty is the same as before]. ‘Two Bhikkhus have been guilty of a Samghadisesa offence. When the Patimokkha is being recited they say thus: “ Now do we come to perceive it; for this rule they say has been handed down in the Suttas, is contained in the Suttas, and comes into recitation every half month.” As touching that Samghadisesa offence, they (thus) come to be of * It is probably to be understood that a like rule is to apply in the other similar cases mentioned in the last paragraph of chap. 32. ID, 35, 1 PROBATION AND PENANCE. 435 opinion that it is a Samgh4disesa offence. One of them conceals, the other does not conceal it. He who has concealed it [&c.; the penalty is the same as before}. 35. 1. ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu is guilty of a number of Samghddisesa offences—definite, and not definite—of one designation, and of various designations—similar to each other, and dissimilar —connected with each other, and disconnected’. He asks the Samgha for an inclusive probation on account of those offences?» The Samgha imposes upon him an inclusive probation on account of those offences. He undergoing that probation is guilty meanwhile of a number of SamghAdisesa offences, definite ones, which he does not conceal. He asks the Samgha to throw him back on account of those intervening offences to the commencement (of his term of probation). The Samgha [does so] by a lawful proceeding that cannot be quashed, and fit 1 See chap. 33 for this list. ; * In accordance with the rule laid down in chap. 28, which shows that by ‘a Bhikkhu’ must be understood ‘a Bhikkhu who is under probation ;’ and the offences he has committed must have been concealed by him. * Akuppa. The technical trm kammam kopeti is not to revoke the valid decision of a kamma regularly held, but to show that the kamma by reason of some irregularity was no real kamma, and its whole proceedings therefore void. One may compare akupp4& me eto-vimutti spoken by the Buddha immediately after he had attained Nirvaza under the Bo Tree (Ariyapariyosina Sutta in H. O.’s ‘Buddha,’ p. 429) and the opposite idea in Sutta Nipata IV, 3, 5. Ff 2 436 KULLAVAGGA. II, 35, 2. for the occasion; and it also imposes a MAnatta upon him, but by an unlawful proceeding, and then by an unlawful proceeding rehabilitates him. That Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, is not purified from those offences.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.