Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1[This section is the same as the last, reading ‘he recollects’ for ‘he is aware,’ and ‘he does not recollect’ for ‘he is not aware.’] 5. [This section is again the same as section 3, reading ‘he is certain’ for ‘he is aware,’ and ‘he is not certain’ for ‘he is not aware.’] 30. 1. [The whole of the last chapter is ‘repeated in the case of a Bhikkhu who, having committed offences, becomes a SAmanera, goes out of his mind, or becomes weak in his mind!, and the text then goes on] ‘He becomes diseased in his sensations. His offences are some of them concealed, some not concealed. Of some offences he is aware, of some he is not aware. Some offences he recollects, some . he does not recollect. Of some offences he is certain, of some he is not certain. Those offences of which he was not certain, those he conceals; those offences of which he was certain, those he does not conceal. Then he becomes diseased in his sensations. When he has recovered power over his sensations, those offences of which he previously had been certain and had concealed, of those he is afterwards still certain, but does not conceal them; and those offences of which he previously had been ? See above, chap. 27, and Mahavagga II, 22, 3; IX, 4, 7. III, 30, 1. PROBATION AND PENANCE. 427 uncertain and had not concealed, of those he became certain but did not conceal them. Those offences of which he previously had been certain and had concealed, of those he was afterwards still certain and did not conceal; while those offences of which he previously had been uncertain, and had not con- — cealed, of those offences he afterwards became certain and did conceal them. Those offences of which previously he had been certain, and had concealed, of those offences he was afterwards still certain and did conceal them; while those offences of which he previously had been uncertain and had not concealed, of those offences he afterwards became certain, and did not conceal them. Those offences of which he previously had been certain, and had concealed them, of those offences he was afterwards still certain and did conceal them; whilst those offences of which he previously had been uncertain and did not conceal them, of those offences he afterwards became certain and did conceal them,—on that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, {the same penalty is to be imposed as in chapter 29, section I, paragraph 4.]’ Here end the hundred cases! in which a Manatta (is to be imposed after a change of state in the guilty Bhikkhu). 1 The hundred cases are made up thus: Chap. 29, §§ 1, 2, 3, 4,5 contain each of them four cases (after our correction of 29. 2); so that chap. 29 gives altogether twenty cases. Then in chap. 30, each of these twenty cases is repeated in the four other cases there given; so that chap. 30 gives altogether eighty cases. Of these eighty cases, as usual, at the end of a repetition, the last (four cases) are set out in full. 428 KULLAVAGGA. IMI, 33, r. 31.
2Then in chap. 30, each of these twenty cases is repeated in the four other cases there given; so that chap. 30 gives altogether eighty cases. Of these eighty cases, as usual, at the end of a repetition, the last (four cases) are set out in full. 428 KULLAVAGGA. IMI, 33, r. 31. 1. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who is undergoing probation is guilty meanwhile of a number of - SamghAdisesa offences, and without concealing them then throws off the robes, and he, when he has again received the upasampada4, does not conceal those offences —that Bhikkhu ought to be thrown back to the commencement (of his term of probation). ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu (&c., as before, down to) and he, when he has again received the upasampad§, does conceal those offences— that Bhikkhu ought to be thrown back to the commencement (of his term of probation), and an inclusive probation ought to be imposed upon him (corresponding to the time which has elapsed since) the first offence among those offences which he has concealed, _ ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who is undergoing probation is guilty meanwhile of a number of Samghdadisesa offences, and, concealing them, throws off the robes; and he, when he has again received the upasampada, does not conceal those offences—that Bhikkhu ought to be thrown back to the commencement of his term of probation, and an inclusive probation ought to be imposed upon him (corresponding to the period which has elapsed since) the first offence among those offences which he has concealed.’ [The same judgment if he has concealed the offences before he throws off the robes, and also after he has again received the upasampada.]! ? This section corresponds to chap. 29, section 1. II, 31, 3- PROBATION AND PENANCE. 429 2. ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who is undergoing probation is guilty meanwhile of a number of Samgh4disesa offences, and some of them he has concealed and some of them he has not concealed ; and after he has thrown off the robes and again received the upasampada, he does not afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had concealed, and he does not afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed—[the judgment is the same as in the last paragraph of § 1}.’ - [In the same case down to] he does not afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had concealed, and he does afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed [the judgment is the same]. [In the same case, down to] he does afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had concealed, and he does not afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed [the judgment is the same]. [In the same case, down to] he does afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had concealed, and he does afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed [the judgment is the same]?.
3[In the same case, down to] he does afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had concealed, and he does afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed [the judgment is the same]?. 3. ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who is undergoing probation is guilty meariwhile of a number of Samgh4disesa offences, and he is aware of some of those offences, and not aware of others; and he conceals those offences of which he is aware, but does not conceal those offences of which he is 1 This section corresponds to chap. 29, section.2. 430 KULLAVAGGA. IM, 32, 1. not aware. After having thrown off the robes and again received the upasampadéa, those offences of which he had previously [&c., as in chapter 29, section 3, down to] on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is the same as in the last section, chapter 31, § 2]. [The rest of this chapter corresponds exactly to chapter 29, §§ 4, 5, and chapter 30; the penalty being always the same.] 82, 1. ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who has rendered himself liable to the MAnatta discipline, or is undergoing the Manatta discipline, or is fit to be rehabilitated, is guilty meanwhile of a number of Samgh4disesa offences which he does not conceal ; and he then throws off the robes, and again receives the upasampad4,—then with regard to the Bhikkhu so liable to the M4natta discipline, or undergoing the M4natta discipline, or fit to be rehabilitated, the same rules are to apply as in the case of a Bhikkhu so acting while undergoing probation’. ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who is fit to be rehabilitated? is guilty meanwhile of a number of Samghddisesa offences which he does not conceal ; and he thén becomes a SAmazera, goes out of his mind, becomes weak in his mind, or becomes diseased in his sensations ; his offences are some of them ? As laid down in chap. 31. ® This includes, of course, the two other cases of a Bhikkhu who has rendered himself liable to, or is undergoing the M4natta discipline, JIT, 33, ¥ PROBATION AND PENANCE, 431 concealed, some of them not concealed .... [and so on, as in chapter 30, down to the end, excepting that the penalty is here the same as it is in the previous chapters 31 and 32]. 33. 1. ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu is guilty of a number of Samgh4disesa offences, definite, and not concealed—not definite, and not concealed—of one designation, and not concealed—of various designations, and not concealed—similar, and not concealed—dissimilar, and not concealed—connected}?, and not concealed—disconnected, and not concealed —and then throws off the robes?,’... ? On the opposition of vavatthita and sambhinna, compare Minayeff Patimokkha, p. 29, where these two expressions are used of language.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1[This section is the same as the last, reading ‘he recollects’ for ‘he is aware,’ and ‘he does not recollect’ for ‘he is not aware.’] 5. [This section is again the same as section 3, reading ‘he is certain’ for ‘he is aware,’ and ‘he is not certain’ for ‘he is not aware.’] 30. 1. [The whole of the last chapter is ‘repeated in the case of a Bhikkhu who, having committed offences, becomes a SAmanera, goes out of his mind, or becomes weak in his mind!, and the text then goes on] ‘He becomes diseased in his sensations. His offences are some of them concealed, some not concealed. Of some offences he is aware, of some he is not aware. Some offences he recollects, some . he does not recollect. Of some offences he is certain, of some he is not certain. Those offences of which he was not certain, those he conceals; those offences of which he was certain, those he does not conceal. Then he becomes diseased in his sensations. When he has recovered power over his sensations, those offences of which he previously had been certain and had concealed, of those he is afterwards still certain, but does not conceal them; and those offences of which he previously had been ? See above, chap. 27, and Mahavagga II, 22, 3; IX, 4, 7. III, 30, 1. PROBATION AND PENANCE. 427 uncertain and had not concealed, of those he became certain but did not conceal them. Those offences of which he previously had been certain and had concealed, of those he was afterwards still certain and did not conceal; while those offences of which he previously had been uncertain, and had not con- — cealed, of those offences he afterwards became certain and did conceal them. Those offences of which previously he had been certain, and had concealed, of those offences he was afterwards still certain and did conceal them; while those offences of which he previously had been uncertain and had not concealed, of those offences he afterwards became certain, and did not conceal them. Those offences of which he previously had been certain, and had concealed them, of those offences he was afterwards still certain and did conceal them; whilst those offences of which he previously had been uncertain and did not conceal them, of those offences he afterwards became certain and did conceal them,—on that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, {the same penalty is to be imposed as in chapter 29, section I, paragraph 4.]’ Here end the hundred cases! in which a Manatta (is to be imposed after a change of state in the guilty Bhikkhu). 1 The hundred cases are made up thus: Chap. 29, §§ 1, 2, 3, 4,5 contain each of them four cases (after our correction of 29. 2); so that chap. 29 gives altogether twenty cases. Then in chap. 30, each of these twenty cases is repeated in the four other cases there given; so that chap. 30 gives altogether eighty cases. Of these eighty cases, as usual, at the end of a repetition, the last (four cases) are set out in full. 428 KULLAVAGGA. IMI, 33, r. 31.
2Then in chap. 30, each of these twenty cases is repeated in the four other cases there given; so that chap. 30 gives altogether eighty cases. Of these eighty cases, as usual, at the end of a repetition, the last (four cases) are set out in full. 428 KULLAVAGGA. IMI, 33, r. 31. 1. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who is undergoing probation is guilty meanwhile of a number of - SamghAdisesa offences, and without concealing them then throws off the robes, and he, when he has again received the upasampada4, does not conceal those offences —that Bhikkhu ought to be thrown back to the commencement (of his term of probation). ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu (&c., as before, down to) and he, when he has again received the upasampad§, does conceal those offences— that Bhikkhu ought to be thrown back to the commencement (of his term of probation), and an inclusive probation ought to be imposed upon him (corresponding to the time which has elapsed since) the first offence among those offences which he has concealed, _ ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who is undergoing probation is guilty meanwhile of a number of Samghdadisesa offences, and, concealing them, throws off the robes; and he, when he has again received the upasampada, does not conceal those offences—that Bhikkhu ought to be thrown back to the commencement of his term of probation, and an inclusive probation ought to be imposed upon him (corresponding to the period which has elapsed since) the first offence among those offences which he has concealed.’ [The same judgment if he has concealed the offences before he throws off the robes, and also after he has again received the upasampada.]! ? This section corresponds to chap. 29, section 1. II, 31, 3- PROBATION AND PENANCE. 429 2. ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who is undergoing probation is guilty meanwhile of a number of Samgh4disesa offences, and some of them he has concealed and some of them he has not concealed ; and after he has thrown off the robes and again received the upasampada, he does not afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had concealed, and he does not afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed—[the judgment is the same as in the last paragraph of § 1}.’ - [In the same case down to] he does not afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had concealed, and he does afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed [the judgment is the same]. [In the same case, down to] he does afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had concealed, and he does not afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed [the judgment is the same]. [In the same case, down to] he does afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had concealed, and he does afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed [the judgment is the same]?.
3[In the same case, down to] he does afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had concealed, and he does afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed [the judgment is the same]?. 3. ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who is undergoing probation is guilty meariwhile of a number of Samgh4disesa offences, and he is aware of some of those offences, and not aware of others; and he conceals those offences of which he is aware, but does not conceal those offences of which he is 1 This section corresponds to chap. 29, section.2. 430 KULLAVAGGA. IM, 32, 1. not aware. After having thrown off the robes and again received the upasampadéa, those offences of which he had previously [&c., as in chapter 29, section 3, down to] on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is the same as in the last section, chapter 31, § 2]. [The rest of this chapter corresponds exactly to chapter 29, §§ 4, 5, and chapter 30; the penalty being always the same.] 82, 1. ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who has rendered himself liable to the MAnatta discipline, or is undergoing the Manatta discipline, or is fit to be rehabilitated, is guilty meanwhile of a number of Samgh4disesa offences which he does not conceal ; and he then throws off the robes, and again receives the upasampad4,—then with regard to the Bhikkhu so liable to the M4natta discipline, or undergoing the M4natta discipline, or fit to be rehabilitated, the same rules are to apply as in the case of a Bhikkhu so acting while undergoing probation’. ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who is fit to be rehabilitated? is guilty meanwhile of a number of Samghddisesa offences which he does not conceal ; and he thén becomes a SAmazera, goes out of his mind, becomes weak in his mind, or becomes diseased in his sensations ; his offences are some of them ? As laid down in chap. 31. ® This includes, of course, the two other cases of a Bhikkhu who has rendered himself liable to, or is undergoing the M4natta discipline, JIT, 33, ¥ PROBATION AND PENANCE, 431 concealed, some of them not concealed .... [and so on, as in chapter 30, down to the end, excepting that the penalty is here the same as it is in the previous chapters 31 and 32]. 33. 1. ‘And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu is guilty of a number of Samgh4disesa offences, definite, and not concealed—not definite, and not concealed—of one designation, and not concealed—of various designations, and not concealed—similar, and not concealed—dissimilar, and not concealed—connected}?, and not concealed—disconnected, and not concealed —and then throws off the robes?,’... ? On the opposition of vavatthita and sambhinna, compare Minayeff Patimokkha, p. 29, where these two expressions are used of language.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.