Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1some definite, and some not definite and (all) concealed ....some definite, and some not definite, some concealed, some not concealed—then that Bhikkhu is to be thrown back, and an inclusive probation is to be imposed upon him, according to the duration of 1 Parim4n4, the meaning of which is open to much doubt. The Samanta Pas4dik4 merely says, Antara samb4hula 4pattiyo Apaggati pariman4 pasikshannfyo ti adisu Apatti-parizssedavase parimanfyo &’ eva appafikkhanndyo fa ’ti attho. The only conclusion to be drawn from this is that the word is acc. fem. plur., and not an adverb. Compare chap. 33, below. 3 The text has a full paragraph for each of these cases, 422 KULLAVAGGA. TIT, 29, t. the time since the first of the offences which he had concealed.’ [The same if the offences are committed whilst he is liable to the MAnatta discipline, or undergoing the M4natta discipline, or pending his rehabilitation.] Here end the thirty-six cases (of fresh offences being committed whilst under probation)". 29. 1. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who has committed numerous Samghadisesa offences, but has not concealed them, throw off the robes, and he, ‘having afterwards again received the upasampada, does not conceal them. A MAnatta, O Bhikkhus, is to be imposed upon that Bhikkhu. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu (&c., as before, down to) throw off the robes, and he, having afterwards again received the upasampadaA, does conceal them,—on that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, a probation is to be imposed according to the duration of the time during which he has concealed any offence in the batch of offences thus afterwards concealed?; and after that a M4natta is to be imposed. 1 This chapter is repeated below, chap. 33, for the cases in which a new ordination has followed after the offences have been committed. . * The Samanta PasfdikA says, Pakkhimasmim 4pattikkhandhe ti eko ’va so 4pattikkhandho, pafésAAditatté pana pakkhimasmim Apattikkhandhe ti vuttam. Purimasmin ti etthapi es’ eva nayo, III, 29, 2. PROBATION AND PENANCE. 423 ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who has committed numerous Samghddisesa offences, and has concealed them, throw off the robes, and he, after having again received the upasampada, does not conceal them,—on that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, a probation is to be imposed according to the duration of the time during which he has concealed any offence in the batch of offences thus previously concealed !; and after that a M4natta is to be imposed upon him. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who has committed numerous Samgh4disesa offences, and has concealed them, throw off the robes, and, after again receiving the upasampada, he does conceal them, —on that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, a probation is to be imposed corresponding to the duration of the time during which he has concealed any offence either in the first or in the batch of offences thus afterwards concealed; and after that a MAnatta is to be imposed upon him.
222. ‘[In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu have com- 1 See the close of the last note. * This section should correspond to chap. 31, section 2, but as noted by H. O. in his edition of the text, p. 312, there is very great confusion in the MSS. We ought to have four cases of which the distinctions are as under. Those offences { concealed before are afterwards not concealed + —not concealed before ” not ” - —concealed before ” not ,, + —- 2 { not concealed before » concealed } — + concealed before » concealed \ + + 3 { not concealed before ” not concealed _- — concealed before » concealed } + + 4 { not concealed before ” concealed — + All these four cases are required to make up the one hundred 424 KULLAVAGGA., I, 29, 3+ mitted numerous Samghddisesa offences, and some of his offences have been concealed, and some not concealed ; and he, having thrown off the robes, and again received the upasampada, does not afterwards conceal those offences which he had previously concealed, and does not afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed,— on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is to be the same as in section I, paragraph 4}.] ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu [&c., as in last paragraph, down to] does not afterwards conceal those offences which he had previously concealed, and does conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed,—on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is to be the same as in section 1, paragraph 4]. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu (&c., as in last paragraph, down to) does afterwards conceal those offences which he had previously concealed, and does not afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed,—on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is to be the same as in section 1, paragraph 4]. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu (&c., as in last paragraph, down to) does afterwards conceal those offences which he had previously concealed, and does afterwards conceal those offences which previously _he had not concealed,—on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is to be the same as in section 1, paragraph 4]. 3. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu have committed numerous SamghAdisesa offences, and of some cases mentioned in the title at the close of chap. 30; but the first is altogether omitted in the text, and the others are not properly discriminated. We have supplied the first in brackets, and corrected the others accordingly. "II, 29, 3. PROBATION AND PENANCE, 425
330; but the first is altogether omitted in the text, and the others are not properly discriminated. We have supplied the first in brackets, and corrected the others accordingly. "II, 29, 3. PROBATION AND PENANCE, 425 of them he is aware, but of some of them he is not aware; and he conceals those offences of which he is aware, but does not conceal those offences of which he is not aware; after having thrown off the robes, and again received the upasampada, those offences of which he had previously been aware, and which he did then conceal, of them, afterwards, he is still aware, and he does not conceal them ; and those offences of which previously he had not been aware and did not then conceal, of them, afterwards, he becomes aware, and does not conceal them,—on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is the same as in section I, paragraph 3]. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu (&c., as in the last paragraph, down to) and again received the upasam pada, those offences of which he had previously been aware, and which he did then conceal, of them, afterwards, he is still aware, and he does not conceal them ; and those offences of which previously he had not been aware, and did not then conceal, of them, afterwards, he becomes aware, and does conceal them,—on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is the same as in section 1, paragraph 4]. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu (&c., as in the last paragraph, down to) which he did then conceal, of them, afterwards, he is still aware, and does conceal them; and of those offences of which previously he had not been aware, and did not then conceal, of them, afterwards, he becomes aware, and does not conceal them,—on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is the same as in section 1, paragraph 4}. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu (&c., as in the last paragraph, down to) which he did then conceal, of them, afterwards, he is still aware, and does conceal 426 KULLAVAGGA. IT, 29, 4. them; and of those offences of which previously he had not been aware, and did not then conceal, of them, afterwards, he becomes aware, and does conceal them,—on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is the same as in section 1, paragraph 4].’ 4. [This section is the same as the last, reading ‘he recollects’ for ‘he is aware,’ and ‘he does not recollect’ for ‘he is not aware.’] 5. [This section is again the same as section 3, reading ‘he is certain’ for ‘he is aware,’ and ‘he is not certain’ for ‘he is not aware.’] 30.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1some definite, and some not definite and (all) concealed ....some definite, and some not definite, some concealed, some not concealed—then that Bhikkhu is to be thrown back, and an inclusive probation is to be imposed upon him, according to the duration of 1 Parim4n4, the meaning of which is open to much doubt. The Samanta Pas4dik4 merely says, Antara samb4hula 4pattiyo Apaggati pariman4 pasikshannfyo ti adisu Apatti-parizssedavase parimanfyo &’ eva appafikkhanndyo fa ’ti attho. The only conclusion to be drawn from this is that the word is acc. fem. plur., and not an adverb. Compare chap. 33, below. 3 The text has a full paragraph for each of these cases, 422 KULLAVAGGA. TIT, 29, t. the time since the first of the offences which he had concealed.’ [The same if the offences are committed whilst he is liable to the MAnatta discipline, or undergoing the M4natta discipline, or pending his rehabilitation.] Here end the thirty-six cases (of fresh offences being committed whilst under probation)". 29. 1. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who has committed numerous Samghadisesa offences, but has not concealed them, throw off the robes, and he, ‘having afterwards again received the upasampada, does not conceal them. A MAnatta, O Bhikkhus, is to be imposed upon that Bhikkhu. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu (&c., as before, down to) throw off the robes, and he, having afterwards again received the upasampadaA, does conceal them,—on that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, a probation is to be imposed according to the duration of the time during which he has concealed any offence in the batch of offences thus afterwards concealed?; and after that a M4natta is to be imposed. 1 This chapter is repeated below, chap. 33, for the cases in which a new ordination has followed after the offences have been committed. . * The Samanta PasfdikA says, Pakkhimasmim 4pattikkhandhe ti eko ’va so 4pattikkhandho, pafésAAditatté pana pakkhimasmim Apattikkhandhe ti vuttam. Purimasmin ti etthapi es’ eva nayo, III, 29, 2. PROBATION AND PENANCE. 423 ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who has committed numerous Samghddisesa offences, and has concealed them, throw off the robes, and he, after having again received the upasampada, does not conceal them,—on that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, a probation is to be imposed according to the duration of the time during which he has concealed any offence in the batch of offences thus previously concealed !; and after that a M4natta is to be imposed upon him. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu who has committed numerous Samgh4disesa offences, and has concealed them, throw off the robes, and, after again receiving the upasampada, he does conceal them, —on that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, a probation is to be imposed corresponding to the duration of the time during which he has concealed any offence either in the first or in the batch of offences thus afterwards concealed; and after that a MAnatta is to be imposed upon him.
222. ‘[In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu have com- 1 See the close of the last note. * This section should correspond to chap. 31, section 2, but as noted by H. O. in his edition of the text, p. 312, there is very great confusion in the MSS. We ought to have four cases of which the distinctions are as under. Those offences { concealed before are afterwards not concealed + —not concealed before ” not ” - —concealed before ” not ,, + —- 2 { not concealed before » concealed } — + concealed before » concealed \ + + 3 { not concealed before ” not concealed _- — concealed before » concealed } + + 4 { not concealed before ” concealed — + All these four cases are required to make up the one hundred 424 KULLAVAGGA., I, 29, 3+ mitted numerous Samghddisesa offences, and some of his offences have been concealed, and some not concealed ; and he, having thrown off the robes, and again received the upasampada, does not afterwards conceal those offences which he had previously concealed, and does not afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed,— on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is to be the same as in section I, paragraph 4}.] ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu [&c., as in last paragraph, down to] does not afterwards conceal those offences which he had previously concealed, and does conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed,—on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is to be the same as in section 1, paragraph 4]. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu (&c., as in last paragraph, down to) does afterwards conceal those offences which he had previously concealed, and does not afterwards conceal those offences which previously he had not concealed,—on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is to be the same as in section 1, paragraph 4]. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu (&c., as in last paragraph, down to) does afterwards conceal those offences which he had previously concealed, and does afterwards conceal those offences which previously _he had not concealed,—on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is to be the same as in section 1, paragraph 4]. 3. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu have committed numerous SamghAdisesa offences, and of some cases mentioned in the title at the close of chap. 30; but the first is altogether omitted in the text, and the others are not properly discriminated. We have supplied the first in brackets, and corrected the others accordingly. "II, 29, 3. PROBATION AND PENANCE, 425
330; but the first is altogether omitted in the text, and the others are not properly discriminated. We have supplied the first in brackets, and corrected the others accordingly. "II, 29, 3. PROBATION AND PENANCE, 425 of them he is aware, but of some of them he is not aware; and he conceals those offences of which he is aware, but does not conceal those offences of which he is not aware; after having thrown off the robes, and again received the upasampada, those offences of which he had previously been aware, and which he did then conceal, of them, afterwards, he is still aware, and he does not conceal them ; and those offences of which previously he had not been aware and did not then conceal, of them, afterwards, he becomes aware, and does not conceal them,—on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is the same as in section I, paragraph 3]. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu (&c., as in the last paragraph, down to) and again received the upasam pada, those offences of which he had previously been aware, and which he did then conceal, of them, afterwards, he is still aware, and he does not conceal them ; and those offences of which previously he had not been aware, and did not then conceal, of them, afterwards, he becomes aware, and does conceal them,—on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is the same as in section 1, paragraph 4]. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu (&c., as in the last paragraph, down to) which he did then conceal, of them, afterwards, he is still aware, and does conceal them; and of those offences of which previously he had not been aware, and did not then conceal, of them, afterwards, he becomes aware, and does not conceal them,—on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is the same as in section 1, paragraph 4}. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu (&c., as in the last paragraph, down to) which he did then conceal, of them, afterwards, he is still aware, and does conceal 426 KULLAVAGGA. IT, 29, 4. them; and of those offences of which previously he had not been aware, and did not then conceal, of them, afterwards, he becomes aware, and does conceal them,—on that Bhikkhu [the penalty is the same as in section 1, paragraph 4].’ 4. [This section is the same as the last, reading ‘he recollects’ for ‘he is aware,’ and ‘he does not recollect’ for ‘he is not aware.’] 5. [This section is again the same as section 3, reading ‘he is certain’ for ‘he is aware,’ and ‘he is not certain’ for ‘he is not aware.’] 30.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.