Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1‘It is performed, Upali, lawfully according to Dhamma and Vinaya (&c., down to:) and in such case this Samgha does not trespass against the law.’ 9. And the Blessed One thus addressed the Bhikkhus: ‘If a complete congregation, O Bhikkhus, grants to a Bhikkhu to whom sativinaya ought to be granted, an amf/davinaya, in such case, O Bhikkhus, this act is performed unlawfully against Dhamma and Vinaya, and in such case this Samgha trespasses against the law. If a complete congregation, O Bhikkhus, institutes against a Bhikkhu to whom sativinaya ought to be granted, the tassapApiyyasikakamma (&c.?, down to:) grants to a person on whom the 1 The same dyads as in § 5. * In this paragraph all possible combinations of two different Samghakammas are formed in this way: first, sativinaya is combined with amf/Aavinaya and all the rest, down to upasampada ; then amf/Aavinaya with all terms from tassapApiyyasika down to sativinaya, and so on; the whole series ends thus with the combinations of upasampad4raha with all terms from sativinaya down to abbh4na. 280 MAHAVAGGA. IX, 7, 1 upasampadé& ordination ought to be conferred, the decree of abbhAna,—in such case, O Bhikkhus, this act is performed unlawfully against Dhamma and Vinaya, and in such case this Samgha trespasses against the law.’ End of the second Bhazav4ra, which contains the questions of Upiali. 7. 1, ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu be litigious, contentious, quarrelsome, disputatious, and constantly raise questions before the Samgha. And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “ This Bhikkhu, friends, is indeed litigious, contentious, &c.; well, let us proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma!.” And they proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma unlawfully * with an incomplete congregation 8, and he then goes from that district to another district. There the Bhikkhus say among each other: “ Against this Bhikkhu, friends, the Samgha has proceeded with the tagganiyakamma unlawfully with an incomplete congregation; well, let us proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma.” And they proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma unlawfully with a complete congregation, and he then goes from that district again to another district. And there the Bhikkhus again say among each other (&c., 1 See Xullavagga I, 1-8. 2 See above, chap. 3, § 3 seq. 5 See above, chap. 3, § 5. IX, 7, 7. FORMAL ACTS OF THE SAMGHA. 281 down to:) and they proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma lawfully with an incomplete congregation .... seemingly lawfully? with an incomplete congregation .... seemingly lawfully with a complete congregation’. 2-5. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu be litigious, &c.® .
2281 down to:) and they proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma lawfully with an incomplete congregation .... seemingly lawfully? with an incomplete congregation .... seemingly lawfully with a complete congregation’. 2-5. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu be litigious, &c.® . 6. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu be ignorant, unlearned, a constant offender, unable to discern what is an offence‘, and lives in lay society, unduly associating himself with lay people. And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “ This Bhikkhu, friends, is indeed ignorant, unlearned, &c.; well, let us proceed against him with the nissayakammas,” and they proceed against him with the nissayakamma unlawfully with an incomplete congregation, &c.°® 7. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu leads a life hurtful to the laity, and devoted to evil’. And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “ This 1 See above, chap. 3, § 7. 2 See above, chap. 3, § 8. 5 As in §1, but with a different arrangement of the five categories on which this exposition is based: unlawfully with an incomplete congregation, unlawfully with a complete congregation, lawfully with an incomplete congregation, seemingly lawfully with an incomplete congregation, seemingly lawfully with a complete congregation. In §1 these categories are arranged in their natural order ; in § 2 the second is placed at the head, then follow the third, fourth, fifth, and finally the first; in § 3 the exposition likewise begins with the third and ends with the second, &c. This arrangement is called ‘a wheel’ (4akka). * See the note at chap. 4, § 9. 5 See Kullavagga I, 9-12. * The same five cases and the same dakka as in §§ 1-5. 7 See the 13th Samgh4disesa Rule. 282 MAHAVAGGA. 1X, 7, 8 Bhikkhu, friends, leads a life hurtful to the laity, and devoted to evil; well, let us proceed against him with the pabbaganiyakamma},” &c.* 8. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu abuses and reviles lay people. And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “ This Bhikkhu, friends, abuses and reviles lay people; well, let us proceed against him with the pa¢is4raziyakamma¥’,” &c.? g-11. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu, having committed an offence, refuses to see that offence (committed by himself)*. And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “This Bhikkhu, friends, has committed an offence and refuses to see that offence; well, let us pronounce expulsion against him for his refusal to see that offence®,” &c.?
3And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “This Bhikkhu, friends, has committed an offence and refuses to see that offence; well, let us pronounce expulsion against him for his refusal to see that offence®,” &c.? 12+13. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu, against whom the Samgha has proceeded with the tagganiyakamma, behaves himself properly, lives modestly, aspires to get clear of his penance, and asks for the revocation of the tagganiyakamma sentence. And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “This Bhikkhu, friends, against whom the Samgha has proceeded with the tagganiyakamma, in truth behaves himself properly; he lives modestly, &c.; well, let us revoke the tagganiyakamma sentence pronounced against him.” And they revoke the tagganiyakamma sentence 1 See Lullavagga I, 13-17. 2 As in §§ 1-5 or in § 6. 5 Kullavagga I, 18-24. 4 §10: A Bhikkhu, having committed an offence, refuses to atone for that offence. § 11: A Bhikkhu refuses to renounce a false doctrine. 5 § ro: For his refusal to atone for that offence. § 11: For his refusal to renounce that false doctrine. IX, 7, 1s. | FORMAL ACTS OF THE SAMGHA. 283 pronounced against him unlawfully with an incomplete congregation. And he then goes from that district to another district. There the Bhikkhus say among each other: “The tagganiyakamma sentence, friends, pronounced against this Bhikkhu has been revoked by the Samgha unlawfully with an incomplete congregation,” &c.} 14. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu against whom the Samgha has proceeded with the nissayakamma.... with the pabbaganiyakamma . with the pa¢isdraziyakamma.... against whom the Samgha has pronounced expulsion for his refusal to see an offence .... for his refusal to atone for an offence... . for his refusal to renounce a false doctrine, behaves himself properly, &c.? 15. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu be litigious, contentious, quarrelsome, disputatious, and constantly raise questions before the Samgha. And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “This Bhikkhu, friends, is indeed litigious, contentious, &c.; well, let us proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma.” And they proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma, unlawfully with an incomplete congregation. Now among the Samgha residing in that district a contention is raised whether this is an act performed unlawfully with an incomplete congregation, or an act performed unlawfully with a complete congregation, or an act performed lawfully with an incomplete 1 The analogous five cases with the akka development as in §§ 1-5. * As in § 1, 13. 284 MAHAVAGGA. IX, 7, 16.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1‘It is performed, Upali, lawfully according to Dhamma and Vinaya (&c., down to:) and in such case this Samgha does not trespass against the law.’ 9. And the Blessed One thus addressed the Bhikkhus: ‘If a complete congregation, O Bhikkhus, grants to a Bhikkhu to whom sativinaya ought to be granted, an amf/davinaya, in such case, O Bhikkhus, this act is performed unlawfully against Dhamma and Vinaya, and in such case this Samgha trespasses against the law. If a complete congregation, O Bhikkhus, institutes against a Bhikkhu to whom sativinaya ought to be granted, the tassapApiyyasikakamma (&c.?, down to:) grants to a person on whom the 1 The same dyads as in § 5. * In this paragraph all possible combinations of two different Samghakammas are formed in this way: first, sativinaya is combined with amf/Aavinaya and all the rest, down to upasampada ; then amf/Aavinaya with all terms from tassapApiyyasika down to sativinaya, and so on; the whole series ends thus with the combinations of upasampad4raha with all terms from sativinaya down to abbh4na. 280 MAHAVAGGA. IX, 7, 1 upasampadé& ordination ought to be conferred, the decree of abbhAna,—in such case, O Bhikkhus, this act is performed unlawfully against Dhamma and Vinaya, and in such case this Samgha trespasses against the law.’ End of the second Bhazav4ra, which contains the questions of Upiali. 7. 1, ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu be litigious, contentious, quarrelsome, disputatious, and constantly raise questions before the Samgha. And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “ This Bhikkhu, friends, is indeed litigious, contentious, &c.; well, let us proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma!.” And they proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma unlawfully * with an incomplete congregation 8, and he then goes from that district to another district. There the Bhikkhus say among each other: “ Against this Bhikkhu, friends, the Samgha has proceeded with the tagganiyakamma unlawfully with an incomplete congregation; well, let us proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma.” And they proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma unlawfully with a complete congregation, and he then goes from that district again to another district. And there the Bhikkhus again say among each other (&c., 1 See Xullavagga I, 1-8. 2 See above, chap. 3, § 3 seq. 5 See above, chap. 3, § 5. IX, 7, 7. FORMAL ACTS OF THE SAMGHA. 281 down to:) and they proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma lawfully with an incomplete congregation .... seemingly lawfully? with an incomplete congregation .... seemingly lawfully with a complete congregation’. 2-5. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu be litigious, &c.® .
2281 down to:) and they proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma lawfully with an incomplete congregation .... seemingly lawfully? with an incomplete congregation .... seemingly lawfully with a complete congregation’. 2-5. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu be litigious, &c.® . 6. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu be ignorant, unlearned, a constant offender, unable to discern what is an offence‘, and lives in lay society, unduly associating himself with lay people. And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “ This Bhikkhu, friends, is indeed ignorant, unlearned, &c.; well, let us proceed against him with the nissayakammas,” and they proceed against him with the nissayakamma unlawfully with an incomplete congregation, &c.°® 7. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu leads a life hurtful to the laity, and devoted to evil’. And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “ This 1 See above, chap. 3, § 7. 2 See above, chap. 3, § 8. 5 As in §1, but with a different arrangement of the five categories on which this exposition is based: unlawfully with an incomplete congregation, unlawfully with a complete congregation, lawfully with an incomplete congregation, seemingly lawfully with an incomplete congregation, seemingly lawfully with a complete congregation. In §1 these categories are arranged in their natural order ; in § 2 the second is placed at the head, then follow the third, fourth, fifth, and finally the first; in § 3 the exposition likewise begins with the third and ends with the second, &c. This arrangement is called ‘a wheel’ (4akka). * See the note at chap. 4, § 9. 5 See Kullavagga I, 9-12. * The same five cases and the same dakka as in §§ 1-5. 7 See the 13th Samgh4disesa Rule. 282 MAHAVAGGA. 1X, 7, 8 Bhikkhu, friends, leads a life hurtful to the laity, and devoted to evil; well, let us proceed against him with the pabbaganiyakamma},” &c.* 8. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu abuses and reviles lay people. And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “ This Bhikkhu, friends, abuses and reviles lay people; well, let us proceed against him with the pa¢is4raziyakamma¥’,” &c.? g-11. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu, having committed an offence, refuses to see that offence (committed by himself)*. And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “This Bhikkhu, friends, has committed an offence and refuses to see that offence; well, let us pronounce expulsion against him for his refusal to see that offence®,” &c.?
3And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “This Bhikkhu, friends, has committed an offence and refuses to see that offence; well, let us pronounce expulsion against him for his refusal to see that offence®,” &c.? 12+13. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu, against whom the Samgha has proceeded with the tagganiyakamma, behaves himself properly, lives modestly, aspires to get clear of his penance, and asks for the revocation of the tagganiyakamma sentence. And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “This Bhikkhu, friends, against whom the Samgha has proceeded with the tagganiyakamma, in truth behaves himself properly; he lives modestly, &c.; well, let us revoke the tagganiyakamma sentence pronounced against him.” And they revoke the tagganiyakamma sentence 1 See Lullavagga I, 13-17. 2 As in §§ 1-5 or in § 6. 5 Kullavagga I, 18-24. 4 §10: A Bhikkhu, having committed an offence, refuses to atone for that offence. § 11: A Bhikkhu refuses to renounce a false doctrine. 5 § ro: For his refusal to atone for that offence. § 11: For his refusal to renounce that false doctrine. IX, 7, 1s. | FORMAL ACTS OF THE SAMGHA. 283 pronounced against him unlawfully with an incomplete congregation. And he then goes from that district to another district. There the Bhikkhus say among each other: “The tagganiyakamma sentence, friends, pronounced against this Bhikkhu has been revoked by the Samgha unlawfully with an incomplete congregation,” &c.} 14. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu against whom the Samgha has proceeded with the nissayakamma.... with the pabbaganiyakamma . with the pa¢isdraziyakamma.... against whom the Samgha has pronounced expulsion for his refusal to see an offence .... for his refusal to atone for an offence... . for his refusal to renounce a false doctrine, behaves himself properly, &c.? 15. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu be litigious, contentious, quarrelsome, disputatious, and constantly raise questions before the Samgha. And the other Bhikkhus say among each other: “This Bhikkhu, friends, is indeed litigious, contentious, &c.; well, let us proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma.” And they proceed against him with the tagganiyakamma, unlawfully with an incomplete congregation. Now among the Samgha residing in that district a contention is raised whether this is an act performed unlawfully with an incomplete congregation, or an act performed unlawfully with a complete congregation, or an act performed lawfully with an incomplete 1 The analogous five cases with the akka development as in §§ 1-5. * As in § 1, 13. 284 MAHAVAGGA. IX, 7, 16.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.