Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1Whosoever approves not thereof, let him speak. ‘“ A second time I say the same thing. Let the venerable Samgha (&c.,. as before'). A third time I say the same thing. Let the venerable Samgha (&c., as before’). , ‘“The Tagganiya-kamma against the Bhikkhus who are followers of Paduka and Lohitaka has been carried by the Samegha. The Samgha approves (the motion). Therefore is it silent. Thus do I understand.”’ 23%, 1. ‘There are three things, O Bhikkhus, by which, when a Tagganiya-kamma is characterised, it is against the Dhamma, and against the Vinaya, and difficult to be settled; (that is to say), when it has not been carried out in a full assembly of properly qualified persons, according to law and justice, and in the presence of the litigant parties 5— when it has been carried out without the accused person having been heard—when it has been carried out without the accused person having confessed himself guilty. A Tagganiya-kamma, O Bhikkhus, charac- 1 The motion just proposed is repeated down to the end. 2 Repeated below, chapters 10, 14, and 19. * All these details are involved in the meaning of the technical term asammukhat4, which is fully explained in Xullavagga IV, 14, 16, and following. I, 2,1. THE MINOR DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS. 333 terised by these three things is against the Dhamma, and against the Vinaya, and difficult to be settled. ‘There are other three things, O Bhikkhus, by which, when a Tagganiya-kamma has been characterised, it is against the Dhamma, and against the Vinaya, and difficult to be settled; (that is to say), when it has been carried out though no fault has been committed—when it has been carried out for a Paragika or a Samghddisesa offence '—when it has been carried out though the fault has been confessed. A Tagganiya-kamma, O Bhikkhus, characterised (&c., as before, down to) settled. ‘There are other three things, O Bhikkhus, by which, when a Tagganiya-kamma has been characterised, it is against the Dhamma, and against the Vinaya, and difficult to be settled; (that is to say), when it has been carried out without the accused person having been warned—when it has been carried out without the accused person having been called upon to remember (whether he has or has not committed the offence)—when it has been carried out without the accused person having been convicted. A Tagganiya-kamma, O Bhikkhus, characterised (&c., as before, down to) settled. ‘There are other three things, O Bhikkhus, by which, when a Tagganiya-kamma has been characterised, it is against the Dhamma, and against the Vinaya, and difficult to be settled ; (that is to say), when it has not been carried out in a properly constituted meeting properly conducted *—when it has 1 Buddhaghosa says, Adesanfg4miniy4 ti Paragikapattiya va Samghadisesapattiya va. * As in the first paragraph of this section more fully described. The word here used is the same. . 324 KULLAVAGGA. I, 2,
2* As in the first paragraph of this section more fully described. The word here used is the same. . 324 KULLAVAGGA. I, 2, been carried out without justice —when it has been carried out without the presence and approval of all the Bhikkhus belonging to the particular circuit? A Tagganiya-kamma, O Bhikkhus, characterised by these three things is (&c., as before, down to) settled. ‘There are other three things, O Bhikkhus, by which, when a Tagganiya-kamma has been characterised, it is against the Dhamma, and against the Vinaya, and difficult to be settled; (that is to say), when it has been carried out without the accused person having been heard—when it has been carried out without justice—when it has been carried out without the presence and approval of all the Bhikkhus belonging to the circuit. A Tagganiya-kamma, O Bhikkhus, characterised by these three things is (&c., as before, down to) settled. ‘There are other three things (&c., as before, down to) that is to say, when it has been carried out without the accused person having been convicted—when it has been carried out without justice—when it has been carried out without the presence and approval of all the Bhikkhus belonging to the circuit.’ [And in a similar way each of the three things in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this section are united with the two things just repeated in each of paragraphs 4, 5, and 6, to make six further cases in which a Tagganiya-kamma is declared to be against the Dhamma, and against the Vinaya, and difficult to be revoked.] Here end the twelve cases of a proceeding (Kamma) which is against the law. } Adhammena; perhaps ‘contrary to the Rules.’ * Vaggena for vi+-aggena, the opposite of samaggena. See our note on the 21st Paittiya, and Mahavagga IX, 3, 5. I, 4,1. THE MINOR DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS. 335 3. 1. ‘There are three things, O Bhikkhus, by which, when a Tagganiya-kamma is characterised, it is a proceeding in accordance with the Dhamma, a proceeding in accordance with the Vinaya, and is easy to be settled; (that is to say), when it has been carried out in a full assembly of qualified persons, according to law, and in the presence of the litigant parties—when it has been carried out after the accused person has been heard—when it has been carried out after the accused person has confessed himself guilty. A Tagganiya-kamma, O Bhikkhus, characterised by these three things is in accordance with the Dhamma, and in accordance with the Vinaya, and is easy to be settled.’ [And in a similar way the opposite of each of the twelve propositions in the last section is here laid down. ] Here end the twelve cases of a proceeding (Kamma) which is according to law. 4
3] Here end the twelve cases of a proceeding (Kamma) which is according to law. 4 1. ‘ There are three things,O Bhikkhus, which, when they characterise a Bhikkhu, the Samgha, if it likes, should carry out the Tagganiya-kamma against him; (that is to say), when he is a maker of strife, quarrelsome, a maker of disputes, given to idle talk, and a raiser of legal questions in the Samgha1— when he is dull, stupid, full of faults, and devoid of merit—when he is living in lay society, in unlawful 1 This refers to the Introductory Story, I, 1, 1. 336 KULLAVAGGA. T, 4, 2. association with the world. - There are three things, O Bhikkhus, which, when the Samgha suspects (&c., as before, down to) against him. ‘There are other three things, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to) against him; (that is to say), when he has failed in morality as regards moral things—when he has failed in conduct as regards transgression—when he has failed in opinion as regards the principal matters of opinion’. There are three things, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to) against him. ‘There are other three things, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to) against him; (that is to say), when he speaks in dispraise of the Buddha—when he speaks in dispraise of the Dhamma—when he speaks in dispraise of the Samgha. These are three things, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to) against him. 2. ‘There are three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus, against whom, if the Samgha likes, it should carry out the Tagganiya-kamma; (that is to say), one who is a maker of strife (&c., as in § 1, down to) a raiser of legal questions in the Samgha—one who is dull, stupid, full of faults, and devoid of merit—and one who is living in lay society, in unlawful association with the world. These are three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to) the Tagganiya-kamma. ‘There are other three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus, against whom, if the Samgha likes, it should carry out the Tagganiya-kamma; (that is to say), one who has failed in morality in regard to moral matters—one who has failed in conduct * Compare Mahavagga I, 36, 8, and our note there. I,5,1. THE MINOR DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS. 337 as regards transgression—one who has failed in opinion as regards the principal matters of opinion. These are three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus (&c., as before, down to) the Tagganiya-kamma. ‘There are other three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus, against whom, if the Samgha likes, it should carry out the Tagganiya-kamma; (that is to say), one who speaks in dispraise of the Buddha—one who speaks in dispraise of the Dhamma—one who speaks in dispraise of the Samgha. These are three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus (&c., as before, down to) the Tagganiyakamma,’ Here end the six permissive cases of Tagganiyakamma. Bt,
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1Whosoever approves not thereof, let him speak. ‘“ A second time I say the same thing. Let the venerable Samgha (&c.,. as before'). A third time I say the same thing. Let the venerable Samgha (&c., as before’). , ‘“The Tagganiya-kamma against the Bhikkhus who are followers of Paduka and Lohitaka has been carried by the Samegha. The Samgha approves (the motion). Therefore is it silent. Thus do I understand.”’ 23%, 1. ‘There are three things, O Bhikkhus, by which, when a Tagganiya-kamma is characterised, it is against the Dhamma, and against the Vinaya, and difficult to be settled; (that is to say), when it has not been carried out in a full assembly of properly qualified persons, according to law and justice, and in the presence of the litigant parties 5— when it has been carried out without the accused person having been heard—when it has been carried out without the accused person having confessed himself guilty. A Tagganiya-kamma, O Bhikkhus, charac- 1 The motion just proposed is repeated down to the end. 2 Repeated below, chapters 10, 14, and 19. * All these details are involved in the meaning of the technical term asammukhat4, which is fully explained in Xullavagga IV, 14, 16, and following. I, 2,1. THE MINOR DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS. 333 terised by these three things is against the Dhamma, and against the Vinaya, and difficult to be settled. ‘There are other three things, O Bhikkhus, by which, when a Tagganiya-kamma has been characterised, it is against the Dhamma, and against the Vinaya, and difficult to be settled; (that is to say), when it has been carried out though no fault has been committed—when it has been carried out for a Paragika or a Samghddisesa offence '—when it has been carried out though the fault has been confessed. A Tagganiya-kamma, O Bhikkhus, characterised (&c., as before, down to) settled. ‘There are other three things, O Bhikkhus, by which, when a Tagganiya-kamma has been characterised, it is against the Dhamma, and against the Vinaya, and difficult to be settled; (that is to say), when it has been carried out without the accused person having been warned—when it has been carried out without the accused person having been called upon to remember (whether he has or has not committed the offence)—when it has been carried out without the accused person having been convicted. A Tagganiya-kamma, O Bhikkhus, characterised (&c., as before, down to) settled. ‘There are other three things, O Bhikkhus, by which, when a Tagganiya-kamma has been characterised, it is against the Dhamma, and against the Vinaya, and difficult to be settled ; (that is to say), when it has not been carried out in a properly constituted meeting properly conducted *—when it has 1 Buddhaghosa says, Adesanfg4miniy4 ti Paragikapattiya va Samghadisesapattiya va. * As in the first paragraph of this section more fully described. The word here used is the same. . 324 KULLAVAGGA. I, 2,
2* As in the first paragraph of this section more fully described. The word here used is the same. . 324 KULLAVAGGA. I, 2, been carried out without justice —when it has been carried out without the presence and approval of all the Bhikkhus belonging to the particular circuit? A Tagganiya-kamma, O Bhikkhus, characterised by these three things is (&c., as before, down to) settled. ‘There are other three things, O Bhikkhus, by which, when a Tagganiya-kamma has been characterised, it is against the Dhamma, and against the Vinaya, and difficult to be settled; (that is to say), when it has been carried out without the accused person having been heard—when it has been carried out without justice—when it has been carried out without the presence and approval of all the Bhikkhus belonging to the circuit. A Tagganiya-kamma, O Bhikkhus, characterised by these three things is (&c., as before, down to) settled. ‘There are other three things (&c., as before, down to) that is to say, when it has been carried out without the accused person having been convicted—when it has been carried out without justice—when it has been carried out without the presence and approval of all the Bhikkhus belonging to the circuit.’ [And in a similar way each of the three things in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this section are united with the two things just repeated in each of paragraphs 4, 5, and 6, to make six further cases in which a Tagganiya-kamma is declared to be against the Dhamma, and against the Vinaya, and difficult to be revoked.] Here end the twelve cases of a proceeding (Kamma) which is against the law. } Adhammena; perhaps ‘contrary to the Rules.’ * Vaggena for vi+-aggena, the opposite of samaggena. See our note on the 21st Paittiya, and Mahavagga IX, 3, 5. I, 4,1. THE MINOR DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS. 335 3. 1. ‘There are three things, O Bhikkhus, by which, when a Tagganiya-kamma is characterised, it is a proceeding in accordance with the Dhamma, a proceeding in accordance with the Vinaya, and is easy to be settled; (that is to say), when it has been carried out in a full assembly of qualified persons, according to law, and in the presence of the litigant parties—when it has been carried out after the accused person has been heard—when it has been carried out after the accused person has confessed himself guilty. A Tagganiya-kamma, O Bhikkhus, characterised by these three things is in accordance with the Dhamma, and in accordance with the Vinaya, and is easy to be settled.’ [And in a similar way the opposite of each of the twelve propositions in the last section is here laid down. ] Here end the twelve cases of a proceeding (Kamma) which is according to law. 4
3] Here end the twelve cases of a proceeding (Kamma) which is according to law. 4 1. ‘ There are three things,O Bhikkhus, which, when they characterise a Bhikkhu, the Samgha, if it likes, should carry out the Tagganiya-kamma against him; (that is to say), when he is a maker of strife, quarrelsome, a maker of disputes, given to idle talk, and a raiser of legal questions in the Samgha1— when he is dull, stupid, full of faults, and devoid of merit—when he is living in lay society, in unlawful 1 This refers to the Introductory Story, I, 1, 1. 336 KULLAVAGGA. T, 4, 2. association with the world. - There are three things, O Bhikkhus, which, when the Samgha suspects (&c., as before, down to) against him. ‘There are other three things, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to) against him; (that is to say), when he has failed in morality as regards moral things—when he has failed in conduct as regards transgression—when he has failed in opinion as regards the principal matters of opinion’. There are three things, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to) against him. ‘There are other three things, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to) against him; (that is to say), when he speaks in dispraise of the Buddha—when he speaks in dispraise of the Dhamma—when he speaks in dispraise of the Samgha. These are three things, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to) against him. 2. ‘There are three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus, against whom, if the Samgha likes, it should carry out the Tagganiya-kamma; (that is to say), one who is a maker of strife (&c., as in § 1, down to) a raiser of legal questions in the Samgha—one who is dull, stupid, full of faults, and devoid of merit—and one who is living in lay society, in unlawful association with the world. These are three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus, (&c., as before, down to) the Tagganiya-kamma. ‘There are other three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus, against whom, if the Samgha likes, it should carry out the Tagganiya-kamma; (that is to say), one who has failed in morality in regard to moral matters—one who has failed in conduct * Compare Mahavagga I, 36, 8, and our note there. I,5,1. THE MINOR DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS. 337 as regards transgression—one who has failed in opinion as regards the principal matters of opinion. These are three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus (&c., as before, down to) the Tagganiya-kamma. ‘There are other three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus, against whom, if the Samgha likes, it should carry out the Tagganiya-kamma; (that is to say), one who speaks in dispraise of the Buddha—one who speaks in dispraise of the Dhamma—one who speaks in dispraise of the Samgha. These are three kinds of Bhikkhus, O Bhikkhus (&c., as before, down to) the Tagganiyakamma,’ Here end the six permissive cases of Tagganiyakamma. Bt,
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.