Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1‘In case, O Bhikkhus, there be no offence which a Bhikkhu should atone for, &c.? ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, there be no false doctrine which a Bhikkhu should renounce, &c.? 2. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, there be no offence which a Bhikkhu should see, and there be no offence which he should atone for, and if the Samgha, or a number of Bhikkhus, or a single person reprove him (and say): “You have committed an offence, friend; do you see that offence? Atone for that offence,’—and he replies: “There is no offence, friends, which I should see; there is no offence, 1 The ukkhepaniyakamma 4pattiya appafinissagge (expulsion for a Bhikkhu’s refusal to atone for an offence) is spoken of here exactly in the same terms as those in which the ukkhepaniyakamma 4pattiya adassane (expulsion for a Bhikkhu’s refusal to see an offence) is spoken of in the preceding clause. The brethren say to the pretended offender, ‘You have committed an offence, friend ; atone for that offence’—which he refuses to do. * As above; the Bhikkhus institute the ukkhepaniyakamma papikaya di/#Aiya appasinissagge (expulsion for a Bhikkhu’s refusal to renounce a false doctrine). IX,5,9. | FORMAL ACTS OF THE SAMGHA. 275 friends, which I should atone for,” and the Samgha pronounces expulsion against him for his refusal to see that offence, or for his refusal to atone for that offence,—this is an unlawful act. 3-5). 6-7. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, there be an offence which a Bhikkhu should see, and if the Samgha, or a number of Bhikkhus, or a single person reprove him (and say): ‘You have committed an offence, friend ; do you see that offence ?”—and he replies: “Yes, friends, I see it,’ and the Samgha pronounces expulsion against him for his (pretended) refusal to see that offence,—this is an unlawful act. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, there be an offence which a Bhikkhu should atone for, &c.? 8-9. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, there be an offence which a Bhikkhu should see, and if the Samgha, or a number of Bhikkhus, or a single person reprove him (and say): “You have committed an offence, friend; do you see that offence ?”—and he replies : “ There is no offence, friends, which I should see,” and the Samgha pronounces expulsion against him for his refusal to see that offence,—this is a lawful act®,’ 1 As in § 2, the first and second of the three cases given in § 1 are combined, so follow now combinations of the first and third, the second and third, and of the first, second, and third cases respectively. * Here follow again the cases of the ukkhepaniyakamma 4pattiy2 appasinissagge and papikaya di/shiy4 appafnissagge, and the combinations of the three cases as above. > Here follow the two other cases, together with the combinations of the three, exactly as above. 276 MAHAVAGGA. IX, 6, 1. 6.
2* Here follow again the cases of the ukkhepaniyakamma 4pattiy2 appasinissagge and papikaya di/shiy4 appafnissagge, and the combinations of the three cases as above. > Here follow the two other cases, together with the combinations of the three, exactly as above. 276 MAHAVAGGA. IX, 6, 1. 6. 1. And the venerable Up4li! went to the place where the Blessed One was. Having approached him and respectfully saluted the Blessed One, he sat down near him. Sitting near him the venerable Upali said to the Blessed One: ‘ Lord, if a complete congregation performs an act at which the presence (of the accused Bhikkhu) is required, in his absence— is this act, Lord, performed lawfully according to Dhamma qnd Vinaya ?’ ‘It is performed, Updali, unlawfully against Dhamma and Vinaya.’ 2. ‘Lord, if a complete congregation performs an act at which (the accused Bhikkhu) ought to be called upon for an answer, without calling upon him for an answer—if it performs an act at which the confession (of the culprit) is required, without his confession—if it grants to a Bhikkhu to whom sativinaya? ought to be granted, an amd /Aavinaya *&— if it proceeds against a Bhikkhu to whom amf//avinaya ought to be granted, with the tassapapiy yasikakamma‘—if it proceeds against a Bhikkhu against whom the tassap4piyyasikakamma ought 1 That the redactors of this Pifaka have chosen Upfli here and at X, 6, Kullavagga ITI, 2, 7, to question the Blessed One about the Vinaya regulations, stands evidently in connection with the tradition ascribing to Up4li an especial authority regarding the rules of the Order and styling him, as is said in the Dipavamsa (IV, 3, 5; V, 1,9), agganikkhittaka, i.e. original depositary, of the Vinaya tradition. See our Introduction, p. xii seq. 2 See Kullavagga IV, 4, 10. 5 See Kullavagga IV, 5. * See Xullavagga IV, 11. IX, 6,3. | FORMAL ACTS OF THE SAMGHA, 277 to be instituted, with the tagganiyakamma!—f it proceeds against a Bhikkhu against whom the tagganiyakamma ought to be instituted, with the nissayakamma—if it proceeds against a Bhikkhu against whom the nissayakamma ought to be instituted, with the pabbaganiyakamma— if it proceeds against a Bhikkhu against whom the pabbaganiyakamma ought to be instituted, with the pa/is4raziyakamma—if it proceeds against a Bhikkhu against whom the paZis4raziyakamma ought to be instituted, with the ukkhepaniyakamma—if it sentences a Bhikkhu against whom the ukkhepaniyakam ma ought to be instituted, to parivasa ?— if it sentences a Bhikkhu who ought to be sentenced to parivdsa, to mflaya pa¢ikassan4—if it sentences a Bhikkhu who ought to be sentenced to miladya pa¢ikassan4, to m4natta—if it grants to a Bhikkhu who ought to be sentenced to manatta, the decree of abbhA4na—if it confers on a Bhikkhu to whom abbh4na ought to be granted, the upasampada ordination,—is this act, Lord, performed lawfully according to Dhamma and Vinaya ?’
33. ‘It is performed, Upali, unlawfully against Dhamma and Vinaya. Ifa complete congregation, Upali, performs an act at which the presence (of the accused Bhikkhu) is required, in his absence (&c., down to:) confers on a Bhikkhu to whom abbh4ana ought to be granted, the upasampada ordination,—in such case, Upali, this act is performed unlawfully against Dhamma and Vinaya, and in such case this Samgha trespasses against the law.’ 1 This Samghakamma and the following ones are explained in Kullavagga I, 1 seq. 3 For this term and the next ones, see Kullavagga III, 1-7. 278 ; MAHAVAGGA. IX, 6, 4. 4. ‘Lord, if a complete congregation performs an act at which the presence (of the accused Bhikkhu) is required, in his presence (&c., down to:) confers on a person, on whom the upasampada ordination ought to be conferred, the upasampada ordination,—is this act, Lord, performed lawfully according to Dhamma and Vinaya ?’ ‘It is performed, Updali, lawfully according to Dhamma and Vinaya. If a complete congregation performs an act (&c., down to:) the upasampadaé ordination,—in such case, U pli, this act is performed lawfully according to Dhamma and Vinaya, and in such case this Samgha does not trespass against the law.’ 5. ‘ Lord, if a complete congregation grants toa Bhikkhu to whom sativinaya ought to be granted, an amfi/#avinaya, and to a Bhikkhu to whom amf/kavinaya ought to be granted, a sativinaya (&c.', down to :) confers on a Bhikkhu to whom abbhana ought to be granted, the upasampada ordination, and grants to a person on whom the upasampada ordination ought to be conferred, the decree of abbh4ana,—is this act, Lord, performed lawiully according to Dhamma and Vinaya ?’ 6. ‘It is performed, Upali, unlawfully against Dhamma and Vinaya. If a complete congregation grants to a Bhikkhu, &c.,—in such case, Upali, this act is performed unlawfully against Dhamma and 1 The Samghakammas enumerated in § 2, beginning with sativinaya, are arranged here in pairs, in direct and reverse order, in this way: sativinaya and amf@/Aavinaya, amf/savinaya and sativinaya ; then amf/favinaya and tassapapiyyasikakamma, tassapapiyyasikikamma and am(/Aavinaya, &c. IX, 6, 9. FORMAL ACTS OF THE SAMGHA._ .- 279 Vinaya, and in such case this Samgha trespasses against the law.’ 7. ‘Lord, if a complete congregation grants sativinaya to a Bhikkhu to whom sativinaya ought to be granted, and amfi/davinaya to a Bhikkhu to whom amf/kavinaya ought to be granted (&c.!, down to:) grants abbh4na to a Bhikkhu to whom abbh4na ought to be granted, and confers the upasam pada ordination on a person on whom the upasampada ordination ought to be conferred,—is this act, Lord, performed lawfully according to Dhamma and Vinaya ?’ 8. ‘It is performed, Upali, lawfully according to Dhamma and Vinaya (&c., down to:) and in such case this Samgha does not trespass against the law.’
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1‘In case, O Bhikkhus, there be no offence which a Bhikkhu should atone for, &c.? ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, there be no false doctrine which a Bhikkhu should renounce, &c.? 2. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, there be no offence which a Bhikkhu should see, and there be no offence which he should atone for, and if the Samgha, or a number of Bhikkhus, or a single person reprove him (and say): “You have committed an offence, friend; do you see that offence? Atone for that offence,’—and he replies: “There is no offence, friends, which I should see; there is no offence, 1 The ukkhepaniyakamma 4pattiya appafinissagge (expulsion for a Bhikkhu’s refusal to atone for an offence) is spoken of here exactly in the same terms as those in which the ukkhepaniyakamma 4pattiya adassane (expulsion for a Bhikkhu’s refusal to see an offence) is spoken of in the preceding clause. The brethren say to the pretended offender, ‘You have committed an offence, friend ; atone for that offence’—which he refuses to do. * As above; the Bhikkhus institute the ukkhepaniyakamma papikaya di/#Aiya appasinissagge (expulsion for a Bhikkhu’s refusal to renounce a false doctrine). IX,5,9. | FORMAL ACTS OF THE SAMGHA. 275 friends, which I should atone for,” and the Samgha pronounces expulsion against him for his refusal to see that offence, or for his refusal to atone for that offence,—this is an unlawful act. 3-5). 6-7. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, there be an offence which a Bhikkhu should see, and if the Samgha, or a number of Bhikkhus, or a single person reprove him (and say): ‘You have committed an offence, friend ; do you see that offence ?”—and he replies: “Yes, friends, I see it,’ and the Samgha pronounces expulsion against him for his (pretended) refusal to see that offence,—this is an unlawful act. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, there be an offence which a Bhikkhu should atone for, &c.? 8-9. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, there be an offence which a Bhikkhu should see, and if the Samgha, or a number of Bhikkhus, or a single person reprove him (and say): “You have committed an offence, friend; do you see that offence ?”—and he replies : “ There is no offence, friends, which I should see,” and the Samgha pronounces expulsion against him for his refusal to see that offence,—this is a lawful act®,’ 1 As in § 2, the first and second of the three cases given in § 1 are combined, so follow now combinations of the first and third, the second and third, and of the first, second, and third cases respectively. * Here follow again the cases of the ukkhepaniyakamma 4pattiy2 appasinissagge and papikaya di/shiy4 appafnissagge, and the combinations of the three cases as above. > Here follow the two other cases, together with the combinations of the three, exactly as above. 276 MAHAVAGGA. IX, 6, 1. 6.
2* Here follow again the cases of the ukkhepaniyakamma 4pattiy2 appasinissagge and papikaya di/shiy4 appafnissagge, and the combinations of the three cases as above. > Here follow the two other cases, together with the combinations of the three, exactly as above. 276 MAHAVAGGA. IX, 6, 1. 6. 1. And the venerable Up4li! went to the place where the Blessed One was. Having approached him and respectfully saluted the Blessed One, he sat down near him. Sitting near him the venerable Upali said to the Blessed One: ‘ Lord, if a complete congregation performs an act at which the presence (of the accused Bhikkhu) is required, in his absence— is this act, Lord, performed lawfully according to Dhamma qnd Vinaya ?’ ‘It is performed, Updali, unlawfully against Dhamma and Vinaya.’ 2. ‘Lord, if a complete congregation performs an act at which (the accused Bhikkhu) ought to be called upon for an answer, without calling upon him for an answer—if it performs an act at which the confession (of the culprit) is required, without his confession—if it grants to a Bhikkhu to whom sativinaya? ought to be granted, an amd /Aavinaya *&— if it proceeds against a Bhikkhu to whom amf//avinaya ought to be granted, with the tassapapiy yasikakamma‘—if it proceeds against a Bhikkhu against whom the tassap4piyyasikakamma ought 1 That the redactors of this Pifaka have chosen Upfli here and at X, 6, Kullavagga ITI, 2, 7, to question the Blessed One about the Vinaya regulations, stands evidently in connection with the tradition ascribing to Up4li an especial authority regarding the rules of the Order and styling him, as is said in the Dipavamsa (IV, 3, 5; V, 1,9), agganikkhittaka, i.e. original depositary, of the Vinaya tradition. See our Introduction, p. xii seq. 2 See Kullavagga IV, 4, 10. 5 See Kullavagga IV, 5. * See Xullavagga IV, 11. IX, 6,3. | FORMAL ACTS OF THE SAMGHA, 277 to be instituted, with the tagganiyakamma!—f it proceeds against a Bhikkhu against whom the tagganiyakamma ought to be instituted, with the nissayakamma—if it proceeds against a Bhikkhu against whom the nissayakamma ought to be instituted, with the pabbaganiyakamma— if it proceeds against a Bhikkhu against whom the pabbaganiyakamma ought to be instituted, with the pa/is4raziyakamma—if it proceeds against a Bhikkhu against whom the paZis4raziyakamma ought to be instituted, with the ukkhepaniyakamma—if it sentences a Bhikkhu against whom the ukkhepaniyakam ma ought to be instituted, to parivasa ?— if it sentences a Bhikkhu who ought to be sentenced to parivdsa, to mflaya pa¢ikassan4—if it sentences a Bhikkhu who ought to be sentenced to miladya pa¢ikassan4, to m4natta—if it grants to a Bhikkhu who ought to be sentenced to manatta, the decree of abbhA4na—if it confers on a Bhikkhu to whom abbh4na ought to be granted, the upasampada ordination,—is this act, Lord, performed lawfully according to Dhamma and Vinaya ?’
33. ‘It is performed, Upali, unlawfully against Dhamma and Vinaya. Ifa complete congregation, Upali, performs an act at which the presence (of the accused Bhikkhu) is required, in his absence (&c., down to:) confers on a Bhikkhu to whom abbh4ana ought to be granted, the upasampada ordination,—in such case, Upali, this act is performed unlawfully against Dhamma and Vinaya, and in such case this Samgha trespasses against the law.’ 1 This Samghakamma and the following ones are explained in Kullavagga I, 1 seq. 3 For this term and the next ones, see Kullavagga III, 1-7. 278 ; MAHAVAGGA. IX, 6, 4. 4. ‘Lord, if a complete congregation performs an act at which the presence (of the accused Bhikkhu) is required, in his presence (&c., down to:) confers on a person, on whom the upasampada ordination ought to be conferred, the upasampada ordination,—is this act, Lord, performed lawfully according to Dhamma and Vinaya ?’ ‘It is performed, Updali, lawfully according to Dhamma and Vinaya. If a complete congregation performs an act (&c., down to:) the upasampadaé ordination,—in such case, U pli, this act is performed lawfully according to Dhamma and Vinaya, and in such case this Samgha does not trespass against the law.’ 5. ‘ Lord, if a complete congregation grants toa Bhikkhu to whom sativinaya ought to be granted, an amfi/#avinaya, and to a Bhikkhu to whom amf/kavinaya ought to be granted, a sativinaya (&c.', down to :) confers on a Bhikkhu to whom abbhana ought to be granted, the upasampada ordination, and grants to a person on whom the upasampada ordination ought to be conferred, the decree of abbh4ana,—is this act, Lord, performed lawiully according to Dhamma and Vinaya ?’ 6. ‘It is performed, Upali, unlawfully against Dhamma and Vinaya. If a complete congregation grants to a Bhikkhu, &c.,—in such case, Upali, this act is performed unlawfully against Dhamma and 1 The Samghakammas enumerated in § 2, beginning with sativinaya, are arranged here in pairs, in direct and reverse order, in this way: sativinaya and amf@/Aavinaya, amf/savinaya and sativinaya ; then amf/favinaya and tassapapiyyasikakamma, tassapapiyyasikikamma and am(/Aavinaya, &c. IX, 6, 9. FORMAL ACTS OF THE SAMGHA._ .- 279 Vinaya, and in such case this Samgha trespasses against the law.’ 7. ‘Lord, if a complete congregation grants sativinaya to a Bhikkhu to whom sativinaya ought to be granted, and amfi/davinaya to a Bhikkhu to whom amf/kavinaya ought to be granted (&c.!, down to:) grants abbh4na to a Bhikkhu to whom abbh4na ought to be granted, and confers the upasam pada ordination on a person on whom the upasampada ordination ought to be conferred,—is this act, Lord, performed lawfully according to Dhamma and Vinaya ?’ 8. ‘It is performed, Upali, lawfully according to Dhamma and Vinaya (&c., down to:) and in such case this Samgha does not trespass against the law.’
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.