Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1doctrine! are heresy,” let them say to him: “If you inhibit, friend, the Pavd4raza of this Bhikkhu, do you inhibit it on account of what you have seen, or of what you have heard, or of what you suspect?” 13. ‘If he replies: “I inhibit it on account of what I have seen, or on account of what I have heard, or on account of what I suspect,” let them say to him: “If you inhibit, friend, the Pavdraza of this Bhikkhu on account of what you have seen, what have you seen? What is it that you have seen? When have you seen it? Where have you seen it? Have you seen him committing a p4régika offence? _Have you seen him committing a samgh4disesa offence? Have you seen him committing a thullaééaya offence, a pAittiya offence, a patidesantya offence,a dukka/a offence, or making himself guilty of wicked language? And where were you? And where was this Bhikkhu? And what did you do? And what did this Bhikkhu do ?” 1 The meaning of antaggahik4 dis#hi (Sanskrit 4ntargrahiké drzshéi? A4ntagrahik4 dv#sh/i?) is unknown to us; Buddhaghosa gives no explanation. Perhaps it may mean doctrine partly false and partly correct (eclectic). IV, 16, 16. THE PAVARANA CEREMONY. 345 14. ‘If he then replies: “I do not inhibit, friends, the Pavaraza of this Bhikkhu on account of what I have seen, but I inhibit it on account of what I have heard,” let them say to him: “If you inhibit, friend, the Pav4razé of this Bhikkhu on account of what you have heard, what have you heard? What is it that you have heard? When have you heard it? Where have you heard it? Have you heard that he has committed a p4rAgika offence, .... (&c., down to)....or that he has made himself guilty of wicked language? Have you heard it from a Bhikkhu? Have you heard it from a Bhikkhuni? Have you heard it from a sikkham4n4, from a sAmazera, from a sAmazeri, from an up4saka, from an upasika, from kings, from royal officers, from Titthiyas, from Titthiya disciples?” 15. ‘If he then replies: “I do not inhibit, friends, the Pavaraza of this Bhikkhu on account of what I have heard, but I inhibit it on account of what I suspect,” let them say to him: “If you inhibit, friend, the Pav4raza of this Bhikkhu on account of what you suspect, what do you suspect? What is it that you suspect? When do you suspect it? Where do you suspect it? Do you suspect that he has committed a paragika offence,....(&c., down to).... wicked language? Does your suspicion come from what you have heard from a Bhikkhu,.... (&c., down to).... from Titthiya disciples ?” 16. ‘If he then replies: “I do not inhibit, friends, the Pav4raza of this Bhikkhu on account of what I suspect; I do not know the reason why I inhibit the Pavaraza of this Bhikkhu,” and if that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, who reproves (the other one), being questioned by intelligent fellow Bhikkhus, is not able 346 MAHAVAGGA. IV, 16, 14.
2IV, 16, 14. to convince their minds, you are right in saying that in such case the Bhikkhu who has been reproved is blameless. But if that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, who reproves (the other one), being questioned by intelligent fellow Bhikkhus, is able to convince their minds, you are right in saying that in such case the Bhikkhu who has been reproved is blamable. 17. ‘If that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, who reproves (another one), admits that he has charged him unfoundedly with a p4r4gika offence, let the Samgha enter upon the samghadisesa proceedings! (against the accuser) and then hold Pavdraza. ‘Tf that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, who reproves (another one), admits that he has charged him unfoundedly with a samgh4disesa offence, let the Samgha treat (the accuser) according to the law? and then hold Pavdrazé. ‘If that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, who reproves (another one), admits that he has charged him unfoundedly with a thullaééaya offence, or with a pa&ittiya offence, or with a pa¢idesantya offence, or with a dukka¢a offence, or with having used wicked language, let the Samgha treat (the accuser) according to the law’ and then hold Pavaravza. 18. ‘If that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, who has been reproved, admits that he has committed a paragika offence, let the Samgha expel him and then hold Pavarazé, ‘If that Bhikkhu, &c., admits that he has com- 1 See the 8th Samghadisesa rule. 2 See the 76th Pafittiya rule. 8 According to Buddhaghosa, the Bhikkhu who brings such an unfounded charge against a fellow Bhikkhu, is guilty of a dukka/a offence. IV, 16, 22. ‘THE PAVARANA CEREMONY. 347 mitted a samghadisesa offence, let the Samgha enter upon the samghdadisesa proceedings (against him) and then hold Pavaraza. ‘If that Bhikkhu, &c., admits that he has committed a thullazkaya offence, or a paékittiya offence, .... (&c., down to).... wicked language, let the Samgha treat him according to the law and then hold Pavaraza. 19. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu on the day of Pavaraza is guilty of a thullaZéaya offence. Some Bhikkhus believe that it is a thullakkaya offence, other Bhikkhus believe that it is a samghadisesa offence. In that case, O Bhikkhus, let those Bhikkhus who take it for a thullakéaya offence, take that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, aside, treat him according to the law, go back to the Samgha, and say: “The offence, friends, which this Bhikkhu has committed, he has atoned for according to the law. If the Samgha is ready, let the Samgha hold A») Pavarana, 20. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu on the day of Pav4raza is guilty of a thullakkaya offence. Some Bhikkhus believe that it is a thullakéaya offence, other Bhikkhus believe that it is a paittiya offence. Some Bhikkhus believe that it is a thullagsaya offence, other Bhikkhus believe that it isa pa¢idesantya offence; athullakaya offence ; a dukka¢a offence; a thullagéaya offence, an offence by wicked language. In that case (&c., as in § 19, down to the end).
3Some Bhikkhus believe that it is a thullagsaya offence, other Bhikkhus believe that it isa pa¢idesantya offence; athullakaya offence ; a dukka¢a offence; a thullagéaya offence, an offence by wicked language. In that case (&c., as in § 19, down to the end). 21, 22. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu on the day of Pavarawaé is guilty ofa pa&ittiya offence, of a pazidesantya offence, ofa dukka‘#a offence, of an offence by wicked language. Some Bhikkhus believe 348 . MAHAVAGGA. IV, 16, 23. that it is an offence by wicked language, other Bhikkhus believe that it is a samghddisesa offence, &c. Some Bhikkhus believe that it is an offence by wicked language, other Bhikkhus believe that it is a dukka/a offence. In that case, O Bhikkhus, let those Bhikkhus who take it for an offence by wicked language, take that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, aside (&c., see § 19). 23. ‘If, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu speaks thus before the assembly on the day of Pavdraw4: “Let the Samgha, reverend Sirs, hear me. Here this deed is known (to me), but not the (guilty) person. If the Samgha is ready, let the Samgha hold Pavaraza excluding this deed,” (the Bhikkhus) ought to reply: “The Blessed One, friend, has prescribed that they who hold Pavdraz4, ought to be pure. If a deed is known, but not the (guilty) person, report it (to us) now.” 24. ‘If,O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu speaks thus before the assembly on the day of Pavdrawa: “Let the Samgha, reverend Sirs, hear me. Here a person is known (to me as guilty), but not his deed. If the Samgha is ready, let the Samgha hold Pavaraza excluding this person,” (the Bhikkhus) ought to reply: “The Blessed One, friend, has prescribed that they who hold Pavdraz4, ought to be complete. Ifa person is known to you (as guilty), but not his deed, report it (to us) now.” 25. ‘If, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu speaks thus before the assembly on the day of Pavdrawza: “Let the Samgha, reverend Sirs, hear me. Here a deed is known (to me) as well as the (guilty) person. If the Samgha is ready, let the Samgha hold Pavaraz& excluding this deed and this person,” (the IV, 17,1. THE PAVARANA CEREMONY. 349 . Bhikkhus) ought to reply: “The Blessed One, friend, has prescribed that they who hold Pavaraz&, ought to be pure as well as complete. If the deed and the (guilty) person are known to you, report it (to us) now.” 26. ‘If, O Bhikkhus, a deed becomes known before the Pav4raza, and the (guilty) person afterwards (i.e. after the Pavarav4), it is right to bring it forward (then)}. ‘If, O Bhikkhus, the (guilty) person becomes known before the Pavdraz4, and his deed afterwards, it is right to bring it forward (then). ‘If, O Bhikkhus, the deed as well as the (guilty) person becomes known before the Pavaraz4, and if (a Bhikkhu)raises up that matter again after the Pav4raz, he makes himself guilty of a pazittiya offence for raising up (a matter that has been settled)*.’ 17.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1doctrine! are heresy,” let them say to him: “If you inhibit, friend, the Pavd4raza of this Bhikkhu, do you inhibit it on account of what you have seen, or of what you have heard, or of what you suspect?” 13. ‘If he replies: “I inhibit it on account of what I have seen, or on account of what I have heard, or on account of what I suspect,” let them say to him: “If you inhibit, friend, the Pavdraza of this Bhikkhu on account of what you have seen, what have you seen? What is it that you have seen? When have you seen it? Where have you seen it? Have you seen him committing a p4régika offence? _Have you seen him committing a samgh4disesa offence? Have you seen him committing a thullaééaya offence, a pAittiya offence, a patidesantya offence,a dukka/a offence, or making himself guilty of wicked language? And where were you? And where was this Bhikkhu? And what did you do? And what did this Bhikkhu do ?” 1 The meaning of antaggahik4 dis#hi (Sanskrit 4ntargrahiké drzshéi? A4ntagrahik4 dv#sh/i?) is unknown to us; Buddhaghosa gives no explanation. Perhaps it may mean doctrine partly false and partly correct (eclectic). IV, 16, 16. THE PAVARANA CEREMONY. 345 14. ‘If he then replies: “I do not inhibit, friends, the Pavaraza of this Bhikkhu on account of what I have seen, but I inhibit it on account of what I have heard,” let them say to him: “If you inhibit, friend, the Pav4razé of this Bhikkhu on account of what you have heard, what have you heard? What is it that you have heard? When have you heard it? Where have you heard it? Have you heard that he has committed a p4rAgika offence, .... (&c., down to)....or that he has made himself guilty of wicked language? Have you heard it from a Bhikkhu? Have you heard it from a Bhikkhuni? Have you heard it from a sikkham4n4, from a sAmazera, from a sAmazeri, from an up4saka, from an upasika, from kings, from royal officers, from Titthiyas, from Titthiya disciples?” 15. ‘If he then replies: “I do not inhibit, friends, the Pavaraza of this Bhikkhu on account of what I have heard, but I inhibit it on account of what I suspect,” let them say to him: “If you inhibit, friend, the Pav4raza of this Bhikkhu on account of what you suspect, what do you suspect? What is it that you suspect? When do you suspect it? Where do you suspect it? Do you suspect that he has committed a paragika offence,....(&c., down to).... wicked language? Does your suspicion come from what you have heard from a Bhikkhu,.... (&c., down to).... from Titthiya disciples ?” 16. ‘If he then replies: “I do not inhibit, friends, the Pav4raza of this Bhikkhu on account of what I suspect; I do not know the reason why I inhibit the Pavaraza of this Bhikkhu,” and if that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, who reproves (the other one), being questioned by intelligent fellow Bhikkhus, is not able 346 MAHAVAGGA. IV, 16, 14.
2IV, 16, 14. to convince their minds, you are right in saying that in such case the Bhikkhu who has been reproved is blameless. But if that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, who reproves (the other one), being questioned by intelligent fellow Bhikkhus, is able to convince their minds, you are right in saying that in such case the Bhikkhu who has been reproved is blamable. 17. ‘If that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, who reproves (another one), admits that he has charged him unfoundedly with a p4r4gika offence, let the Samgha enter upon the samghadisesa proceedings! (against the accuser) and then hold Pavdraza. ‘Tf that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, who reproves (another one), admits that he has charged him unfoundedly with a samgh4disesa offence, let the Samgha treat (the accuser) according to the law? and then hold Pavdrazé. ‘If that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, who reproves (another one), admits that he has charged him unfoundedly with a thullaééaya offence, or with a pa&ittiya offence, or with a pa¢idesantya offence, or with a dukka¢a offence, or with having used wicked language, let the Samgha treat (the accuser) according to the law’ and then hold Pavaravza. 18. ‘If that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, who has been reproved, admits that he has committed a paragika offence, let the Samgha expel him and then hold Pavarazé, ‘If that Bhikkhu, &c., admits that he has com- 1 See the 8th Samghadisesa rule. 2 See the 76th Pafittiya rule. 8 According to Buddhaghosa, the Bhikkhu who brings such an unfounded charge against a fellow Bhikkhu, is guilty of a dukka/a offence. IV, 16, 22. ‘THE PAVARANA CEREMONY. 347 mitted a samghadisesa offence, let the Samgha enter upon the samghdadisesa proceedings (against him) and then hold Pavaraza. ‘If that Bhikkhu, &c., admits that he has committed a thullazkaya offence, or a paékittiya offence, .... (&c., down to).... wicked language, let the Samgha treat him according to the law and then hold Pavaraza. 19. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu on the day of Pavaraza is guilty of a thullaZéaya offence. Some Bhikkhus believe that it is a thullakkaya offence, other Bhikkhus believe that it is a samghadisesa offence. In that case, O Bhikkhus, let those Bhikkhus who take it for a thullakéaya offence, take that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, aside, treat him according to the law, go back to the Samgha, and say: “The offence, friends, which this Bhikkhu has committed, he has atoned for according to the law. If the Samgha is ready, let the Samgha hold A») Pavarana, 20. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu on the day of Pav4raza is guilty of a thullakkaya offence. Some Bhikkhus believe that it is a thullakéaya offence, other Bhikkhus believe that it is a paittiya offence. Some Bhikkhus believe that it is a thullagsaya offence, other Bhikkhus believe that it isa pa¢idesantya offence; athullakaya offence ; a dukka¢a offence; a thullagéaya offence, an offence by wicked language. In that case (&c., as in § 19, down to the end).
3Some Bhikkhus believe that it is a thullagsaya offence, other Bhikkhus believe that it isa pa¢idesantya offence; athullakaya offence ; a dukka¢a offence; a thullagéaya offence, an offence by wicked language. In that case (&c., as in § 19, down to the end). 21, 22. ‘In case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu on the day of Pavarawaé is guilty ofa pa&ittiya offence, of a pazidesantya offence, ofa dukka‘#a offence, of an offence by wicked language. Some Bhikkhus believe 348 . MAHAVAGGA. IV, 16, 23. that it is an offence by wicked language, other Bhikkhus believe that it is a samghddisesa offence, &c. Some Bhikkhus believe that it is an offence by wicked language, other Bhikkhus believe that it is a dukka/a offence. In that case, O Bhikkhus, let those Bhikkhus who take it for an offence by wicked language, take that Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, aside (&c., see § 19). 23. ‘If, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu speaks thus before the assembly on the day of Pavdraw4: “Let the Samgha, reverend Sirs, hear me. Here this deed is known (to me), but not the (guilty) person. If the Samgha is ready, let the Samgha hold Pavaraza excluding this deed,” (the Bhikkhus) ought to reply: “The Blessed One, friend, has prescribed that they who hold Pavdraz4, ought to be pure. If a deed is known, but not the (guilty) person, report it (to us) now.” 24. ‘If,O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu speaks thus before the assembly on the day of Pavdrawa: “Let the Samgha, reverend Sirs, hear me. Here a person is known (to me as guilty), but not his deed. If the Samgha is ready, let the Samgha hold Pavaraza excluding this person,” (the Bhikkhus) ought to reply: “The Blessed One, friend, has prescribed that they who hold Pavdraz4, ought to be complete. Ifa person is known to you (as guilty), but not his deed, report it (to us) now.” 25. ‘If, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu speaks thus before the assembly on the day of Pavdrawza: “Let the Samgha, reverend Sirs, hear me. Here a deed is known (to me) as well as the (guilty) person. If the Samgha is ready, let the Samgha hold Pavaraz& excluding this deed and this person,” (the IV, 17,1. THE PAVARANA CEREMONY. 349 . Bhikkhus) ought to reply: “The Blessed One, friend, has prescribed that they who hold Pavaraz&, ought to be pure as well as complete. If the deed and the (guilty) person are known to you, report it (to us) now.” 26. ‘If, O Bhikkhus, a deed becomes known before the Pav4raza, and the (guilty) person afterwards (i.e. after the Pavarav4), it is right to bring it forward (then)}. ‘If, O Bhikkhus, the (guilty) person becomes known before the Pavdraz4, and his deed afterwards, it is right to bring it forward (then). ‘If, O Bhikkhus, the deed as well as the (guilty) person becomes known before the Pavaraz4, and if (a Bhikkhu)raises up that matter again after the Pav4raz, he makes himself guilty of a pazittiya offence for raising up (a matter that has been settled)*.’ 17.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.