Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1I ADHYAYA, 4 BRAHMANA, 7. 87 a elle man, when he created the gods from his better part?, and when he, who was (then) mortal2, created the immortals. Therefore it was the highest creation. And he who knows this, lives in this his highest creation. 7. Now all this was then undeveloped. It became developed by form and name, so that one could say, ‘He, called so and so, is such a one®.’ Therefore at present also all this is developed by name and form, so that one can say, ‘ He, called so and so, is such a one.’ He (Brahman or the Self) entered thither, to the very tips of the finger-nails, as a razor might be fitted in a razor-case, or as fire in a fire-place *. He cannot be seen, for, in part only, when breathing, he is breath by name; when speaking, speech by name; when seeing, eye by name; when hearing, ear by name; when thinking, mind by name. All these are but the names of his acts. And he who worships (regards) him as the one or the other, does not know him, for he is apart from this (when qualified) by the one or the other (predicate). Let men worship him as Self, for in the Self all these are one. This Self is the footstep of everything, for through it one knows everything®. And as one can find again by footsteps what was lost, thus he who knows this finds glory and praise.
21 Or, when he created the best gods. * As man and sacrificer. Comm. 3 The Comm. takes asau-nama as a compound, instead of idamnima. I read asau nama, he is this by name, viz. Devadatta, &c. Dr. Boehtlingk, who in his Chrestomathie (2nd ed. p. 31) had accepted the views of the Commentator, informs me that he has changed his view, and thinks that we should read asau ndma. 4 Cf. Kaush. Br. Up. VI, 19. 5 « As one finds lost cattle again by following their footsteps, thus one finds everything, if one has found out the Self.” Comm. 88 BRIHADARANYAKA-UPANISHAD. ——————— _——— ne
38. This, which is nearer to us than anything, this Self, is dearer than a son, dearer than wealth, dearer than all else. And if one were to say to one who declares another than the Self dear, that he will lose what is dear to him, very likely it would be so. Let him worship the Self alone as dear. He who worships the Self alone as dear, the object of his love will never perish’. 9. Here they say: ‘If men think that by knowledge of Brahman they will become every thing, what then did that Brahman know, from whence all this sprang?’ 10. Verily in the beginning this was Brahman, that Brahman knew (its) Self only, saying, ‘I am Brahman. From it all this sprang. Thus, whatever Deva was awakened (so as to know Brahman), he indeed became that (Brahman); and the same with Rishis and men. The Azshi Vamadeva saw and understood it, singing, ‘I was Manu (moon), I was the sun.’ Therefore now also he who thus knows that he is Brahman, becomes all this, and even the Devas cannot prevent it, for he himself is their Self. Now if a man worships another deity, thinking the deity is one and he another, he does not know. He is like a beast for the Devas. For verily, as many beasts nourish a man, thus does every man nourish the Devas. If only one beast is taken away, it is not pleasant ; how much more when many are taken! Therefore it is not pleasant to the Devas that men should know this. 11. Verily in the beginning this was Brahman, one ? On rudh, to lose, see Taitt. Samh. II, 6, 8, 5, pp. 765, 771, as pointed out by Dr. Boehtlingk. On fsvaro (yat) tathaiva, syat, see Boehtlingk, s.v.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
1I ADHYAYA, 4 BRAHMANA, 7. 87 a elle man, when he created the gods from his better part?, and when he, who was (then) mortal2, created the immortals. Therefore it was the highest creation. And he who knows this, lives in this his highest creation. 7. Now all this was then undeveloped. It became developed by form and name, so that one could say, ‘He, called so and so, is such a one®.’ Therefore at present also all this is developed by name and form, so that one can say, ‘ He, called so and so, is such a one.’ He (Brahman or the Self) entered thither, to the very tips of the finger-nails, as a razor might be fitted in a razor-case, or as fire in a fire-place *. He cannot be seen, for, in part only, when breathing, he is breath by name; when speaking, speech by name; when seeing, eye by name; when hearing, ear by name; when thinking, mind by name. All these are but the names of his acts. And he who worships (regards) him as the one or the other, does not know him, for he is apart from this (when qualified) by the one or the other (predicate). Let men worship him as Self, for in the Self all these are one. This Self is the footstep of everything, for through it one knows everything®. And as one can find again by footsteps what was lost, thus he who knows this finds glory and praise.
21 Or, when he created the best gods. * As man and sacrificer. Comm. 3 The Comm. takes asau-nama as a compound, instead of idamnima. I read asau nama, he is this by name, viz. Devadatta, &c. Dr. Boehtlingk, who in his Chrestomathie (2nd ed. p. 31) had accepted the views of the Commentator, informs me that he has changed his view, and thinks that we should read asau ndma. 4 Cf. Kaush. Br. Up. VI, 19. 5 « As one finds lost cattle again by following their footsteps, thus one finds everything, if one has found out the Self.” Comm. 88 BRIHADARANYAKA-UPANISHAD. ——————— _——— ne
38. This, which is nearer to us than anything, this Self, is dearer than a son, dearer than wealth, dearer than all else. And if one were to say to one who declares another than the Self dear, that he will lose what is dear to him, very likely it would be so. Let him worship the Self alone as dear. He who worships the Self alone as dear, the object of his love will never perish’. 9. Here they say: ‘If men think that by knowledge of Brahman they will become every thing, what then did that Brahman know, from whence all this sprang?’ 10. Verily in the beginning this was Brahman, that Brahman knew (its) Self only, saying, ‘I am Brahman. From it all this sprang. Thus, whatever Deva was awakened (so as to know Brahman), he indeed became that (Brahman); and the same with Rishis and men. The Azshi Vamadeva saw and understood it, singing, ‘I was Manu (moon), I was the sun.’ Therefore now also he who thus knows that he is Brahman, becomes all this, and even the Devas cannot prevent it, for he himself is their Self. Now if a man worships another deity, thinking the deity is one and he another, he does not know. He is like a beast for the Devas. For verily, as many beasts nourish a man, thus does every man nourish the Devas. If only one beast is taken away, it is not pleasant ; how much more when many are taken! Therefore it is not pleasant to the Devas that men should know this. 11. Verily in the beginning this was Brahman, one ? On rudh, to lose, see Taitt. Samh. II, 6, 8, 5, pp. 765, 771, as pointed out by Dr. Boehtlingk. On fsvaro (yat) tathaiva, syat, see Boehtlingk, s.v.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.