Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
11 See Cowell, Maitr. Up. pref. p. iv. ? Calcutta, 1791 (1869), p. 4; also as quoted in the Mah4vakya-ratn4valf, p. 2”. > Dr. Burnell, in his Tanjore Catalogue, mentions, p. 35%, a Maitrayasibrahmazopanishad, which can hardly be a right title, and p. 36° a Maitrayamiva and Maitreyibrahmana. INTRODUCTION. xlv
2the text of it, as far as it can be restored from the one MS. in my possession : HariZ Om. Brzhadratho vai nama rag4 vairagye putram nidhapayitvedam asdsvatam manyamana/ sariram vairagyam upeto ’razyam nirgagdma, Sa tatra paramam tapa! adityam udikshamava irdhvas tish¢daty. Ante sahasrasya muner antikam 4gag4ma*. Atha Brzhadratho brahmavitpravaram munindram sampigya stutva bahusa# pravamam akarot. So ’bravid agnir ivadhOmakas tegasa nirdahann ivatmavid Bhagava# #Aadkayanya, uttish¢Aottishtha varam vrinishveti raganam abravit*. Sa tasmai punar namaskv7ztyovaka, Bhagavan na(ha)matmavit tvam tattvavik khusrum9o vayam; sa tvaw no brahity etad vratam purastad asakyam ma prikkha prastam Aikshvakanyan kaman vrinishveti SAakayanyah. Sarirasya sarire (sic) aranav abhimrvisyamano ragemam gatham gagada. | Bhagavann, asthiZarmasnayumaggamamsasuklasonitasreshmasrudashikévivmftrapittakaphasamghate durgandhe nidsare ’smi# kharire kim kamabhogaiz. 2 KAmakrodhalobhamohabhayavishadershesh éaviyoganishtasamprayogakshutpipasagaramrityurogasokadyair abhihate ’smiz kharire kim kamabhogaiz. 3 Sarvam kedam kshayishvu pasyamo yatheme damsamasakAdayas trinavan‘ nasyata yodbhitapradhvamsinas. 4 Atha kim etair va pare nye dhamarthards (sic) #akravartinak Sudyumnabhiridyumnakuvalayasvayauvanasvavaddhriyasvasvapatiz sasabindur hariskandro ‘mbarisho nanukastvayatir yaydtir aszarazyokshasenadayo marutabharataprabhrvitayo ragano mishato bandhuvargasya mahatim sriyam tyaktvasmal lokad amum lokam prayanti. 5. Atha kim etair va pare ‘nye gandharvasurayaksharakshasabhitagazapisakoragrahadinam nirodhanam pasyamak. 6 Atha kim etair vanydndm soshavam maharnavanay
31 One expects Asthaya. 2 This -cems better than the Maitrayaa text. He went rear a Muni, viz. Sakayanva. 8 This seems unnecessary. 4 There may be an older reading hidden in this, from which arose the reading of the Maitrayaa B. U. trinavanaspatayodbhitapradhvamsina4, or yo bhitapradhvamsina, xlvi UPANISHADS. baer eee sikharivdm prapatanam dhruvasya prakalanam vatardwam nimagganam_ prithivyad sthandpasaranam surazam. So ‘ham ity etadvidhe ’smin samsare kim kamopabhogair yair evAsritasya sakrvid Avartanayz drisyata ity uddhartum arhasi tyandodapanabheka ivaham asmin sam Bhagavas tvam gatis tvam no gatir iti. 7 Ayam! agnir vaisvanaro yo’yam anta/ purushe yenedam annam payate yad idam adyate tasyaisha ghosho bhavati yam etat karvzav apidhaya srzvoti, sa yadotkramishyan * bhavati nainawz ghosham srinoti. 8 Yatha ® nirindhano vahniZ svayondv upasamyati. 9 * Sa sivak so ’nte vaisvanaro bhitva sa dagdhva sarvawi bhatani prithivyapsu praliyate®, 4pas tegasi liyante ®, tego vayau praliyate’, vayur ak4se viliyate ®, 4kasam indriyeshv, indriyavi tanmatreshu, tanmatrazi bhitadau viliyante’, bhitadi mahati viliyate !°, mahan avyakte viliyate 1, avyaktam akshare viliyate!*, aksharam tamasi viliyate’’, tama ekibhavati parasmin, parastan na’ san nasan na sad ityetan nirvazam anusdsanam iti vedanusasanam.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
Romanised transliteration as printed by the translator, not the original script. This is what we hold.
11 See Cowell, Maitr. Up. pref. p. iv. ? Calcutta, 1791 (1869), p. 4; also as quoted in the Mah4vakya-ratn4valf, p. 2”. > Dr. Burnell, in his Tanjore Catalogue, mentions, p. 35%, a Maitrayasibrahmazopanishad, which can hardly be a right title, and p. 36° a Maitrayamiva and Maitreyibrahmana. INTRODUCTION. xlv
2the text of it, as far as it can be restored from the one MS. in my possession : HariZ Om. Brzhadratho vai nama rag4 vairagye putram nidhapayitvedam asdsvatam manyamana/ sariram vairagyam upeto ’razyam nirgagdma, Sa tatra paramam tapa! adityam udikshamava irdhvas tish¢daty. Ante sahasrasya muner antikam 4gag4ma*. Atha Brzhadratho brahmavitpravaram munindram sampigya stutva bahusa# pravamam akarot. So ’bravid agnir ivadhOmakas tegasa nirdahann ivatmavid Bhagava# #Aadkayanya, uttish¢Aottishtha varam vrinishveti raganam abravit*. Sa tasmai punar namaskv7ztyovaka, Bhagavan na(ha)matmavit tvam tattvavik khusrum9o vayam; sa tvaw no brahity etad vratam purastad asakyam ma prikkha prastam Aikshvakanyan kaman vrinishveti SAakayanyah. Sarirasya sarire (sic) aranav abhimrvisyamano ragemam gatham gagada. | Bhagavann, asthiZarmasnayumaggamamsasuklasonitasreshmasrudashikévivmftrapittakaphasamghate durgandhe nidsare ’smi# kharire kim kamabhogaiz. 2 KAmakrodhalobhamohabhayavishadershesh éaviyoganishtasamprayogakshutpipasagaramrityurogasokadyair abhihate ’smiz kharire kim kamabhogaiz. 3 Sarvam kedam kshayishvu pasyamo yatheme damsamasakAdayas trinavan‘ nasyata yodbhitapradhvamsinas. 4 Atha kim etair va pare nye dhamarthards (sic) #akravartinak Sudyumnabhiridyumnakuvalayasvayauvanasvavaddhriyasvasvapatiz sasabindur hariskandro ‘mbarisho nanukastvayatir yaydtir aszarazyokshasenadayo marutabharataprabhrvitayo ragano mishato bandhuvargasya mahatim sriyam tyaktvasmal lokad amum lokam prayanti. 5. Atha kim etair va pare ‘nye gandharvasurayaksharakshasabhitagazapisakoragrahadinam nirodhanam pasyamak. 6 Atha kim etair vanydndm soshavam maharnavanay
31 One expects Asthaya. 2 This -cems better than the Maitrayaa text. He went rear a Muni, viz. Sakayanva. 8 This seems unnecessary. 4 There may be an older reading hidden in this, from which arose the reading of the Maitrayaa B. U. trinavanaspatayodbhitapradhvamsina4, or yo bhitapradhvamsina, xlvi UPANISHADS. baer eee sikharivdm prapatanam dhruvasya prakalanam vatardwam nimagganam_ prithivyad sthandpasaranam surazam. So ‘ham ity etadvidhe ’smin samsare kim kamopabhogair yair evAsritasya sakrvid Avartanayz drisyata ity uddhartum arhasi tyandodapanabheka ivaham asmin sam Bhagavas tvam gatis tvam no gatir iti. 7 Ayam! agnir vaisvanaro yo’yam anta/ purushe yenedam annam payate yad idam adyate tasyaisha ghosho bhavati yam etat karvzav apidhaya srzvoti, sa yadotkramishyan * bhavati nainawz ghosham srinoti. 8 Yatha ® nirindhano vahniZ svayondv upasamyati. 9 * Sa sivak so ’nte vaisvanaro bhitva sa dagdhva sarvawi bhatani prithivyapsu praliyate®, 4pas tegasi liyante ®, tego vayau praliyate’, vayur ak4se viliyate ®, 4kasam indriyeshv, indriyavi tanmatreshu, tanmatrazi bhitadau viliyante’, bhitadi mahati viliyate !°, mahan avyakte viliyate 1, avyaktam akshare viliyate!*, aksharam tamasi viliyate’’, tama ekibhavati parasmin, parastan na’ san nasan na sad ityetan nirvazam anusdsanam iti vedanusasanam.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
No commentary for this page.