October 1945; the last surviving number of Year IV.
→ ini:4.41
Fetching
One moment.

1Hamsa Yogui then explains that the spiritual Masters of elevated rank, described in the verse as Jnanis and Tatvadarshis4, do not directly undertake the preparation of the aspirants of the first grade mentioned above, but rather assign this duty to Initiates of rank inferior to them. [Sic: the Spanish prints Inamis and Tatvodarshis.]
2This explains why the blind King was placed under the tutelage of Sanjaya.
3In sum, we can summarise this fact in the following form: The conversations between the King and Vyasa on the occasion of the latter's visit show us simply that the King had made true efforts to reach the meaning of the teachings existing in the Scripture, and that he possessed intellectual conditions and competence for spiritual training.
4But it was also evident that he was under the influence of his self-worshipping isolation — Swartha — which prevented his being taken under the direct supervision of Vyasa.
5In consequence of that state, it was necessary to consider the King in the condition of a disciple of the lower class, in the charge of an initiate of the rank of Sanjaya — who, through the grace granted by Vyasa, had acquired not only complete efficiency in the Sastric science and in the development of the powers of clairvoyance and clairaudience, but had also attained Union with the Divinity5.
6After answering the King's multiple questions, the Maharshi prepared to depart — not before the former had begged him to grant him the grace of the final knowledge that would free him from illusions and assure him the "Param Santi", that is, "THE PEACE THAT PASSETH ALL UNDERSTANDING". [Sic: the Spanish prints DE TODA COMPRENSIÓN.]
7Vyasa replied that his ardent desires would be fulfilled by Sanjaya, whose elevated knowledge and virtues he praised.
8He also promised to do all he could for the salvation of the erring Kurus and their followers, because it grieved him to see them engaged in an unjust war that was fatally to lead them to inevitable consequences. [Sic: the Spanish prints salvaci6n, with a numeral.]
9The Yogi's disquisition on what happened between the King and Sanjaya, after Vyasa had departed, we can summarise thus: Sanjaya took advantage of the King's questions concerning the causes of the conflict for the conquest of earthly power, and proceeded with a long and brilliant exposition of the multiple matters — vital and important — for one who found himself in a position such as the King's.
10He explained to him the constitution of the World and other things related to the visible Cosmos — which is, so to say, the raiment of the Divinity immanent in each of its atoms.
114 Masters of Wisdom and Seers, Knowers of the Truth.
125 This signifying almost Omniscience by means of YOGA.
13· 13
Our translation, period-faithful. Citable as our translation, never as the source.
October 1945; the last surviving number of Year IV.
→ ini:4.41
Masthead stereotype unchanged.
Six articles; Lorelair returns to open the number with her prophecy's reckoning.
The forecast scored: Lorelair's June 1944 prediction — peace visible only "from the end of September to October of this year onward" — is recalled and claimed, the war having ended in August-September 1945. The Nº 29 loading already carries the forward edge to this article; here is its landing. The SUMARIO drops Neptune from her title; the article restores it.
→ ini:3.29:4:004
The article's injunction after victory: "Nor must he permit feelings of defeat or of victory. Only one word must reign: PEACE!" — the review's first postwar number setting reconciliation as practice, closing on "Love one another".
The SUN through the twelve houses — the fourth planet of the reference series; the sixth house named its worst seat, the tenth its surest.
The twelfth house's close: the Sun there "also inclines toward occultism" — the series' habit of ending each planet on the esoteric register.
"Desire" closes on the four powers: TO WILL TO KNOW, TO WILL TO KEEP SILENT, TO WILL TO DARE, TO WILL TO WILL — the Sphinx's to-know/to-dare/to-will/to-keep-silent recast with QUERER as the operator; Mabel Collins's "Light on the Path" quoted; signed only "La Plata".
The Astral Plane page's meditation text — "The Initiator is not a human Being, and the Path is the perfect way of living" — with its two purifying practices in capitals; the praxis layer carries the passage.
The Gita Bashya synthesis resumes: the three invocation verses, Krishna and Arjuna as members of the Spiritual Hierarchy, and AHAMSA — "I AM THAT" — as the Prachina Hamsas' office.
→ ini:4.41
Why does Vyasa visit the blind King? Compassion for his son, and the Master's duty — the introduction's narrative frame treated as initiation-doctrine: the King as the disciple who cannot yet be taken directly.
The three discipleship grades return with their full Sanskrit apparatus (Jnana Dipa, Viveka, Vairagya, Tapas) and Arjuna's "I am THY disciple. Save me, O Lord" — the number's central practice text, carried by the praxis layer.
Sanjaya's tutorship of the King — Aparaprakriti and Paraprakriti, the Gayatri as the key, the war as "an incident already foreseen" — the S.D.M.'s Gita reading turning the epic's frame-story into a manual of spiritual direction.
The unsigned coda states the three aims of Yoga — know Brahman, know the purpose of individual existence, co-operate in the divine plan — the tidiest summary of the Mandalam's programme the run has printed.
Jollivet Castelot arrives: Papus's collaborator, President of the Alchemical Society of France, translated from Le Voile d'Isis (April 1925) with a full editorial biography — Hyperchimie, Le Rose Croix, La synthèse de l'or. The estate's French-occult shelf gains its chemistry wing; the run's alchemy coverage now has an author with a laboratory.
→ martinez-de-pasqually
Becquerel's physics folded back into Hermes: "present-day science returns to the ancient doctrine of the hermetists… the Grand Man of the Kabbalah" — Castelot's standing move, and the reason the review adopted him.
Castelot's polemical voice survives translation intact: "My God, how clear all this is! And yet, when one of these gentlemen sees white, another sees black" — the alchemist mocking the physicists' confusion over disintegration, 1925.
The hermetist atom: structure as masculine-feminine affinity, "the primordial and absolutely universal law" — set beside Thomson and Rutherford as an equal hypothesis; atoms and stars under identical laws.
The five recipes for gold — thallium minus one alpha, lead minus two alphas and a beta — Rutherford's transmutation results rewritten as alchemical recipes, then dismissed for their "deplorable" yield in favour of the chemical way.
The Lestrade letter, Lyon, 28 November 1924: 125 grammes of virgin silver, orpiment and kermes, the furnace at 1150/1200º, and an assayer's verdict of unweighable traces "approximately 1/4 of a gramme" — the run's most detailed laboratory protocol, printed as testimony.
The Appeal to the Young Chemists: distrust "fashionable theories, algebrism à outrance and the magister dixit… The future of Chemistry is not confined, thank God, to the laboratories of the Sorbonne" — Castelot's manifesto closing the last surviving number of Year IV.
Castelot's critique of infinite divisibility — "the ion and the electron: might they not correspond rather to vital manifestations… of the atomic being?" — hylozoism offered as physics; the era's occult-scientific frontier in one question.
GIDEE prospectus stereotype at page 23.
→ ini:3.30
Library back cover and imprint close Year IV's surviving run.