October 1945; the last surviving number of Year IV.
→ ini:4.41
Fetching
One moment.

1It is a very peculiar characteristic of Hamsa Yogui to reinforce his suggestions and arguments as much as possible — basing himself on the authority of the Gita and, on occasion, on references from the Anu Gita, in accordance with the known rule of interpretation which establishes that a determinate meaning can be correctly understood by reason of its analogy with similar cases appearing elsewhere.
2The verse in question — observes Hamsa Yogui — enunciates the great principles that govern the relations existing between the spiritual Master and the disciple, and establishes as the duty of the former to impart to the latter the knowledge of Brahma Vidya, preparing them for the conquest of liberation.
3In accord with this verse, then, Hamsa Yogui shows us that the disciple is comprised within the three following denominations: 1.º) It comprehends those involved in the term "PARI PRASNENA", corresponding to the aspirants who, through study, inquiry and reflection, are in the state of developing their discrimination between the transitory and the permanent, the illusory and the real.
42.º) It comprehends the disciples identified by the term "PRANI PATENA" — that is, those who surrender to their Master, confiding in their Sraddha, or faith in his wisdom, which is to guide them surely up the steep slope "AS NARROW AND KEEN AS THE EDGE OF A RAZOR" — as the Upanishads said — a sure guide exempt from errors and a powerful help for the disciple in what touches the development of a sturdy will, full of celestial knowledge, whose pedestal is raised on an infinite love professed by the Master: who without doubt will make him capable of discovering "The lamp of Wisdom"1 (Jnana Dipa), hidden in the most recondite part of himself2 (Atma Stham), by the light of his own conscious perception (Viveka)3 — to protect him from the weak glow of his passions, transmuting these into pure love and austerity (Vairagya and Tapas); and finally, through concentrated contemplation (nitya pravritta aikagrya dhyana), quickens the brilliant flame of direct cognition and, thereby, his identification with the SELF (Samyak darshanabhas). 3.º) Finally, to this grade answer the disciples denominated by the word "Sevaya", or service. [Sic: the Spanish prints IRANI PATENA at the second term.]
5They are those who have proved that the true remedy against the great obstacle to spiritual progress — Swartha, or self-isolation — is found in the practice of Sarvartha, or Universalism; and they give themselves with full heart to the service of their brothers, which service is offered to the Masters, who have as emblem a single beloved word: HUMANITY.
61 HAMSA YOGUI refers to persons who have not attained the power of such discrimination, and points out that they have very little development to be in a condition to have a Spiritual Master.
72 The spirit of reverence and humility that characterises this class of disciples we find justly expressed when they are described approaching the Master with extended arms and visible testimonies of devotion.
8Such an act we find when ARJUNA says to the Lord: "SISYASTEHAM SADHINAM YVANI PRAPANNAM" — "I am THY disciple. Save me, O Lord, I beseech THEE!" 3 ARJUNA typifies the highest class of disciple when, overcoming his personal inclinations which urged him to shun the combat, he takes up his arms again and plays the part that fell to him as a mighty warrior. [Sic: the Spanish prints regir, for rehuir.]
9He thus becomes the servant of his Divine master, rendering to the World the service it demanded of him when the GURU descended to spread his teachings.
10· 12
Our translation, period-faithful. Citable as our translation, never as the source.
October 1945; the last surviving number of Year IV.
→ ini:4.41
Masthead stereotype unchanged.
Six articles; Lorelair returns to open the number with her prophecy's reckoning.
The forecast scored: Lorelair's June 1944 prediction — peace visible only "from the end of September to October of this year onward" — is recalled and claimed, the war having ended in August-September 1945. The Nº 29 loading already carries the forward edge to this article; here is its landing. The SUMARIO drops Neptune from her title; the article restores it.
→ ini:3.29:4:004
The article's injunction after victory: "Nor must he permit feelings of defeat or of victory. Only one word must reign: PEACE!" — the review's first postwar number setting reconciliation as practice, closing on "Love one another".
The SUN through the twelve houses — the fourth planet of the reference series; the sixth house named its worst seat, the tenth its surest.
The twelfth house's close: the Sun there "also inclines toward occultism" — the series' habit of ending each planet on the esoteric register.
"Desire" closes on the four powers: TO WILL TO KNOW, TO WILL TO KEEP SILENT, TO WILL TO DARE, TO WILL TO WILL — the Sphinx's to-know/to-dare/to-will/to-keep-silent recast with QUERER as the operator; Mabel Collins's "Light on the Path" quoted; signed only "La Plata".
The Astral Plane page's meditation text — "The Initiator is not a human Being, and the Path is the perfect way of living" — with its two purifying practices in capitals; the praxis layer carries the passage.
The Gita Bashya synthesis resumes: the three invocation verses, Krishna and Arjuna as members of the Spiritual Hierarchy, and AHAMSA — "I AM THAT" — as the Prachina Hamsas' office.
→ ini:4.41
Why does Vyasa visit the blind King? Compassion for his son, and the Master's duty — the introduction's narrative frame treated as initiation-doctrine: the King as the disciple who cannot yet be taken directly.
The three discipleship grades return with their full Sanskrit apparatus (Jnana Dipa, Viveka, Vairagya, Tapas) and Arjuna's "I am THY disciple. Save me, O Lord" — the number's central practice text, carried by the praxis layer.
Sanjaya's tutorship of the King — Aparaprakriti and Paraprakriti, the Gayatri as the key, the war as "an incident already foreseen" — the S.D.M.'s Gita reading turning the epic's frame-story into a manual of spiritual direction.
The unsigned coda states the three aims of Yoga — know Brahman, know the purpose of individual existence, co-operate in the divine plan — the tidiest summary of the Mandalam's programme the run has printed.
Jollivet Castelot arrives: Papus's collaborator, President of the Alchemical Society of France, translated from Le Voile d'Isis (April 1925) with a full editorial biography — Hyperchimie, Le Rose Croix, La synthèse de l'or. The estate's French-occult shelf gains its chemistry wing; the run's alchemy coverage now has an author with a laboratory.
→ martinez-de-pasqually
Becquerel's physics folded back into Hermes: "present-day science returns to the ancient doctrine of the hermetists… the Grand Man of the Kabbalah" — Castelot's standing move, and the reason the review adopted him.
Castelot's polemical voice survives translation intact: "My God, how clear all this is! And yet, when one of these gentlemen sees white, another sees black" — the alchemist mocking the physicists' confusion over disintegration, 1925.
The hermetist atom: structure as masculine-feminine affinity, "the primordial and absolutely universal law" — set beside Thomson and Rutherford as an equal hypothesis; atoms and stars under identical laws.
The five recipes for gold — thallium minus one alpha, lead minus two alphas and a beta — Rutherford's transmutation results rewritten as alchemical recipes, then dismissed for their "deplorable" yield in favour of the chemical way.
The Lestrade letter, Lyon, 28 November 1924: 125 grammes of virgin silver, orpiment and kermes, the furnace at 1150/1200º, and an assayer's verdict of unweighable traces "approximately 1/4 of a gramme" — the run's most detailed laboratory protocol, printed as testimony.
The Appeal to the Young Chemists: distrust "fashionable theories, algebrism à outrance and the magister dixit… The future of Chemistry is not confined, thank God, to the laboratories of the Sorbonne" — Castelot's manifesto closing the last surviving number of Year IV.
Castelot's critique of infinite divisibility — "the ion and the electron: might they not correspond rather to vital manifestations… of the atomic being?" — hylozoism offered as physics; the era's occult-scientific frontier in one question.
GIDEE prospectus stereotype at page 23.
→ ini:3.30
Library back cover and imprint close Year IV's surviving run.