The Varieties of Religious Experience — William James

p. 49pie, identifies religion with the entire field of the soul's liberation from oppressive moods. " The simplest functions of physiological life," he writes, " may be its ministers. Every one who is at all acquainted ^. with the Persian mystics knows how wine may be regarded as an instrument of religion.

Indeed, in all countries and in all *s- f » C ages, some form of physical enlargement — singing, dancing, drinking, sexual excitement — has been intimately associated with worship. Even the momentary expansion of the soul in laughter is, to however slight an extent, a religious exercise. . . .

Whenever an impulse from the world strikes against the organism, and the resultant is not discomfort or pain, not even the muscular contraction of strenuous manhood, but a joyous expansion or aspiration of the whole soul — there is religion.

It is the infinite for which we hunger, and we ride gladly on every little wave that promises to bear us towards it." ^ But such a straight identification of religion with any and every form of happiness leaves the essential peculiarity of religious happiness out. The more commonplace happinesses which we get are ' reliefs,' occasioned by our momentary escapes from evils either experienced or threatened.

But in its most characteristic embodiments, religious happiness is no mere feeling of escape. It cares no longer to escape. It consents to the evil outwardly as a form of sacrifice — inwardly it knows it to be permanently overcome.

If you ask how religion thus falls on the thorns and faces death, and in the very act annuls annihilation, I cannot explain the matter, for it is religion's secret, and to understand it you must yourself have been a religious man of the extremer type.

In our future examples, even of the simplest and healthiest-minded type of religious consciousness, we shall find this complex sacrificial constitution, in which a higher happiness holds a lower unhappiness in check. In the Louvre there js a » The New Spirit, p. 232.

p. 50picture, by Guido Reni, of St. Michael with his foot on ^ ^ Satan's neck. The richness of the picture is in large part due to the fiend's figure being there. The richness of its allegorical meaning also is due to his being there — that is, the world is all the richer for having a devil in it, so long as we keep our foot upon his neck.

In the religious 3 consciousness, that is just the position in which the fiend, the negative or tragic principle, is found ; and for that very reason the religious consciousness is so rich from the emotional point of view.^ We shall see how in certain men and women it takes on a monstrously ascetic form.

There are saints who have literally fed on the negative principle, on humiliation and privation, and the thought of suffering and death, — their souls growing in happiness just in proportion as their outward state grew more intolerable. No other emotion than religious emotion can bring a man to this peculiar pass.

And it is for that reason that when we ask our question about the value of religion for human life, I think we ought to look for the answer among these violenter examples rather than among those of a more moderate hue. Having the phenomenon of our study in its acutest possible form to start with, we can shade down as much as we please later.

And if in these cases, repulsive as they are to our ordinary worldly way of judging, we find ourselves compelled to acknowledge religion's value and treat it with respect, it will have proved in some way its value for life at large. By subtracting and toning down extravagances we may thereupon proceed to trace the boundaries of its legitimate sway. To be sure, it makes our task difficult to have to deal so much with eccentricities and extremes. "How can ^ I owe this allegorical illustration to my lamented colleague and friend, Charles Carroll Everett.

p. 61religion on the whole be the most important of all human functions," you may ask, " if every several manifestation of it in turn have to be corrected and sobered down and pruned away? Such a thesis seems a paradox impossible to sustain reasonably, — yet I believe that something like it will have to be our final contention.

That personal attitude which the individual finds himself impelled to take up towards what he apprehends to be the divine — and you will remember that this was our definition — will prove to be both a helpless and a sacrificial attitude. That is, we shall have to confess to at least some amount of dependence on sheer mercy, and to practice some amount of renunciation, great or small, to save our souls alive.

The constitution of the world we live in requires it : — " Entbehren sollst du ! sollst entbehren ! Das ist der ewige Gesaiig Der jedera an die Obren kliugt, Den, unser ganzes Leben lang Uns beiser jede Stunde singt.

For when all is said and done, we are in the end absolutely dependent on the universe ; and into sacrifices and surrenders of some sort, deliberately looked at and accepted, we are drawn and pressed as into our only permanent positions of repose. Now in those states of mind which fall short of religion, the surrender is submitted to as an imposition of necessity, and the sacrifice is undergone at the very best without complaint.

In the religious life, on the contrary, surrender and sacrifice are positively espoused : even unnecessary givings-up are added in order that the happiness may increase. Religion thus makes easy and felicitous what in any case is necessai^y ; and if it be the only agency that can accomplish this result, its vital importance as a human faculty