The Nicomachean Ethics — trans. F. H. Peters (1881)

Ifjmtkr justice, and to ask what sort of acts they are concerned tui^ed o/^^^^' ^^^ ^^ what sense justice observes the mean, iTedUn^eZ ^^^ what are the extremes whose mean is that which piTt'eliX'e. is just. And in this inquiry we will follow the same 2 method as before.

We see that all men intend by justice to signify 3 the sort of habit or character that makes men apt to do what is just, and which further makes them act justly * and wish what is just ; while by injustice they intend in like manner to signify the sort of character that makes men act unjustly and wish what is unjust. Let us lay this down, then, as an outline to work upon.

We thus oppose justice and injustice, because a i habit or trained faculty differs in this respect both from a science and a faculty or power. I mean that whereas both of a pair of opposites come under the same science or power, a habit which produces a

* A man may " do that which is just " without " acting justly : " cf. snpra, II. 4, 3, and infra, cap. 8.

1, 1-8.] JUSTICE. 137

certain result does not also produce the opposite result; e.g. health produces healthy manifestations only, and not unhealthy; for we say a man has a healthy gait when he walks like a man in health.

[Not that the two opposites are unconnected] In the first place, a habit is often known by the opposite habit, and often by its causes and results: if we know what good condition is, we can learn from that what bad condition is; and, again, from that which conduces to good condition we can infer what good condition itself is, and conversely from the latter can infer the former. For instance, if good condition be firmness of flesh, it follows that bad condition is flabbiuess of flesh, and that what tends to produce firmness of flesh conduces to good condition.

And, in the second place, if one of a pair of pposite terms have more senses than one, the other term will also, as a general rule, have more than one ;

so that here, if the term "just" have several senses, the term " unjust " also will have severaL

And in fact it seems that both "justice" and " injustice " have several senses, but, as the different things covered by the common name are very closely related, the fact that they are different escapes notice and does not strike us, as it does when there is a great disparity — a great difference, say, in outward appearance — as it strikes every one, for instance, that the kXhq (clavis, collar-bone) which lies under the neck of an animal is different from the KXdg (clavis, key) with which we fasten the door.

Let us then ascertain in how many different senses we call a man unjust.

p. 138

Firstly, he who breaks the laws is considered unjust, and, secondly, he who takes more than his share, or the unfair man.

Plainly, then, a just man will mean (1) a lawabiding and (2) a fair man.

A just thing then will be (1) that which is in accordance with the law, (2) that which is fair ; and the unjust thing will be (1) that which is contrary to law, (2) that which is unfair.

But since the unjust man, in one of the two senses 9 of the word, takes more than his share, the sphere of his action will be good things — not all good things, but those with which good and ill fortune are concerned, which are always good in themselves, but not always good for us — the things that we men pray for and pursue, whereas we ought rather to pray that what is good in itself may be good for us, while we choose that which is good for us.

But the unjust man does not always take more lo than his share ; he sometimes take less, viz. of those things which are bad in the abstract; but as the lesser evil is considered to be in some sort good, and taking more means taking more good, he is said to take more than his share. But in any case he is unfair; for this is a wider term which includes the li other.

We found that the law-breaker is unjust, and 12 -, the law-abiding man is just. Hence it follows that ^ whatever is according to law is just in one sense of the word. [And this, we see, is in fact the case ;] for what the legislator prescribes is according to law, and is always said to be just.