Timaeus — Plato

Afialysis 466 -46^. Ixxv also among men ; and if possible, in what way possible ? About Republic v. war there is no difficulty ; the principle of communism is adapted Analysis. to miUtary service. Parents will take their children to look on 4.67 at a battle, just as potters' boys are trained to the business by looking on at the wheel.

And to the parents themselves, as to other animals, the sight of their young ones will prove a great incentive to bravery. Young warriors must learn, but they must not run into danger, although a certain degree of risk is worth incurring when the benefit is great.

The young creatures should be placed under the care of experienced veterans, and they should have wings — that is to say, swift and tractable steeds on which ^6g they may fly away and escape. One of the first things to be done is to teach a youth to ride. » r- Cowards and deserters shall be degraded to the class <ifi husbandmen ; gentlemen who allow themselves to be taken prisoners, may be presented to the enemy.

But what shall be done to the hero ? First of all he shall be crowned by aU the youths in the army ; secondly, he shall receive the right hand of fellowship ; and thirdly, do you think that there is any harm in his being kissed? We have already determined that he shall have more wives than others, in order that he may have as many children as possible.

And at a feast he shall have more to eat ; we have the authority of Homer for honouring brave men with 'long chines,' which is an appropriate compliment, because meat is a very strengthening thing. Fill the bowl then, and give the best seats and meats to the brave — may they do them good ! And he who dies in battle will be at once declared to be of the golden race, and will, as we believe, become one of Hesiod's 469 guardian angels.

He shall be worshipped after death in the manner prescribed by the oracle ; and not only he, but all other benefactors of the State who die in any other way, shall be admitted to the same honours. The next question is. How shall we treat our enemies ? Shall Hellenes be enslaved ? No ; for there is too great a risk of the whole race passing under the yoke of the barbarians. Or shall the dead be despoiled ?

Certainly not ; for that sort of thing is an excuse for skulking, and has been the ruin of many an army. There is meanness and feminine malice in making an enemy of the dead body, when the soul which was the owner has fled —

Ixxvi Analysis 469-473. Republic V. like a. dog who cannot reach his assailants, and quarrels with the Analysis. stones which are thrown at him instead. Again, the arms of Hellenes should not be offered up in the temples of the Gods ; they 47c are a pollution, for they arc taken from brethren.

And on similar grounds there should be a Hmit to the devastation of Hellenic territory — the houses should not be burnt, nor more than the annual produce carried off.

For war is of two kinds, civil and foreign; the first of which is properly termed 'discord,' and only the second * war ; ' and war between Hellenes is in reality civil war — a quarrel in a family, which is ever to be regarded as unpatriotic and unnatural, and ought to be prosecuted with a view 471 to reconciliation in a true phil-Hellenic spirit, as of those who would chasten but not utterly enslave.

The war is not against a whole nation who are a friendly multitude of men, women, and children, but only against a few guilty persons; when they are punished peace will be restored. That is the way in which Hellenes should war against one another — and against barbarians, as they war against one another now. ' But, my dear Socrates, you are forgetting the main question : Is such a State possible ?

I grant all and more than you say about the blessedness of being one family — fathers, brothers, mothers, daughters, going out to war together; but I want to ascertain the possibility of this ideal State. You are too un- 472 merciful. The first wave and the second wave I have hardly escaped, and now you will certainly drown me with the third. When you see the towering crest of the wave. I expect you to take pity. ' Not a whit.

Well, then, we were led to form our ideal polity in the search after justice, and the just man answered to the just State. Is this ideal at all the worse for being impracticable? Would the picture of a perfectly beautiful man be any the worse because no such man ever lived? Can any reality come up to the idea?

Nature will not allow words to be fully realized ; but if I am to try and 473 realize the ideal of the State in a measure, I think that an approach may be made to the perfection of which I dream by one or two, I do not say slight, but possible changes in the present constitution of States. I would reduce them to a single one — the great wave, as I call it. Until^ then, kings are philosophers, or philosophers are kings, cities will never cease frotn ill : no, nor the

Analysis 473-477. Ixxvii human race; nor will our ideal polity ever come into beitig. I know Republic V. that this is a hard saying, which few will be able to receive. Analysis. * Socrates, all the world will take off his coat and rush upon you 1-74 with sticks and stones, and therefore I would advise you to prepare an answer. You got me into the scrape, I said.

'And I was right,' he replied; 'however, I will stand by you as a sort of do-nothing, well-meaning ally. Having the help of such a champion, I will do my best to maintain my position. And first, I must explain of whom I speak and what sort of natures these are who are to be philosophers and rulers.

As you are a man of pleasure, you will not have forgotten how indiscriminate lovers are in their attachments ; they love all, and turn blemishes into beauties. The snub-nosed youth is said to have a winning grace; the beak of another has a royal look ; the featureless are faultless ; the dark are manly, the fair angels ; the sickly have a new term of endear- ^75 ment invented expressly for them, which is 'honey-pale.

Lovers of wine and lovers of ambition also desire the objects of their affection in every form. Now here comes the point : — The philosopher too is a lover of knowledge in every form ; he has an insatiable curiosity. ' But will curiosity make a philosopher? Are the lovers of sights and sounds, who let out their ears to every chorus at the Dionysiac festivals, to be called philosophers ? ' They are not true philosophers, but only an imitation.

' Then how are we to describe the true ? ' You would acknowledge the existence of abstract ideas, such as 1.76 justice, beauty, good, evil, which are severally one, yet in their various combinations appear to be many.

Those who recognize these realities are philosophers ; whereas the other class hear sounds and see colours, and understand their use in the arts, but cannot attain to the true or waking vision of absolute justice or beauty or truth ; they have not the light of knowledge, but of opinion, and what they see is a dream only. Perhaps he of whom we say the last will be angry with us; can we pacify him without revealing the disorder of his mind?

Suppose we say that, if he has knowledge we rejoice to hear it, but knowledge must be of something which is, as ignorance is of ^77| something which is not ; and there is a third thing, which both is >■ . ' and is not, and is matter of opinion only. Opinion and knowledge,'^ ^ then, having distinct objects, must also be distinct faculties. And .jj^ V