Fetching
One moment.
15 tituted the cult of the sacred fire to implant happiness among men, abolished human sacrifices.
2In every home he united husband and wife in one same prayer, and united the families, the clans, the tribes and all the peoples.
3Rama raised woman before man in her divine functions of wife and mother.
4He made her the priestess of her home, the guardian of the sacred fire.
5And of Krishna, “the Radiant”, who in ancient and millennial India reconciled the solar and lunar cults.
6The solar, which gave the God of the Universe the masculine sex, which had instituted the science of the sacred fire and of prayer, respect for woman, the cult of the ancestors.
7The lunar cult, on the other hand, attributed to the Divinity the feminine sex, adored blind, unconscious nature [Sic: the Spanish prints “natura1eza”, with a numeral] in her violent and terrible manifestations, leaned toward idolatry and black magic, favoured polygamy and tyranny supported on the popular passions.
8Krishna reconciled the two cults and exalted the feminine face of the Divinity.
9That Avatar will teach, in this new sojourn among men, to adore that passive principle from which all the things of the Universe have emanated, which after each pralaya becomes the receiver of the Fohatic impression of the Divine Thought and opens its heart to receive the Single Ray and make the Kosmos arise in limitless Space.
10He will teach them to open the heart to the flow of the Divine Energy, to understand the language of the Divine Mother and to recognise that the Absolute and the Divine Mother are One.
11That is why he who, having the comprehension that God, the sole Reality, the Eternal Essence, is One and Indivisible and, on being adored, receives different names according to the epoch, the place, the race and nationality of his adorers, will feel the need to adore him in his feminine aspect, which will be the one most in harmony with his soul, nourished on divine mercy, with the ideal of feminine tenderness and with infinite compassion.
12Therefore he will adore the Divine Mother Kali, and his favourite prayer will be: Oh, Mother!
13To your mercy I surrender myself.
14May the lotus of your feet keep your child from whatever would draw him away from you.
15Oh, most loving Mother!
16I crave no fame, nor do the pleasures of the senses seduce me.
17Neither do I desire psychic and thaumaturgic powers.
18I want and implore pure love for you, without stain of desires [Sic: the Spanish prints “si mácula” for “sin mácula”], love that does not attach itself to the things of this world, that springs spontaneously from the immortal soul.
19Grant me, oh Mother!, that I may not forget you, seduced by the enchantments of illusion, nor allow me to be entangled in the meshes of samsara.
20I have no one in the world but you.
21I do not know how to sing your name worthily and with deep devotion.
22I lack the knowledge that leads to you.
23I lack genuine devotion.
24Oh!
25Grant me that I may love your infinite mercy!
26If we reflect that this is the prayer pronounced by Him who had come to attain the ecstasy that made him live continually in spiritual communion with God, that it was
Our translation, period-faithful. Citable as our translation, never as the source.
Nº 48 is the review's most Eastern issue to date: a Ramakrishna memorial, the Suddha Dharma Gita commentary, and Guénon's Vedanta-saturated Demiurge instalment fill most of its pages, with only Rouxel's music theory and the astrology course holding the Western line.
The reset masthead introduced in Nº 47 is retained unchanged: the collective 'Instructors and Brothers of Orders' formula, the currency notice, and the 1.80-dollar overseas price.
The SUMARIO prints the Ramakrishna author as 'Arnapakaka' while the article itself signs 'Amapadaka' — a compositor's scramble of the same lodge-name. The contents also show the run's serial discipline: three continuations (Gita commentary, Demiurge, chromotherapy) and one series concluded (Rouxel).
Read at session No. 270 of Papus Centre No. 5 on 15 February — Ramakrishna's birthday fell on 18 February 1836, and the text's 'l10 years since Chandramani gave birth' (the compositor set a letter ell before the digits) confirms the piece as a 110th-birthday commemoration, the Hindu counterpart of the Saint-Yves death-day lecture in Nº 47.
The frame is syncretic from the first line: the Lipikas and 'Lords of Karma' are Blavatsky's terms, the avatar-list runs Rama–Krishna–Buddha–Christ–Chaitanya, and Rama's torch-and-cup and Deva Nahusha come from Schuré's 'Great Initiates' — the lecturer is retelling Ramakrishna's life through the review's own composite canon rather than the Bengali sources.
The Kali prayer given here is a close Spanish rendering of Ramakrishna's recorded prayers to the Divine Mother as transmitted in the Ramakrishna Mission literature ('I want no fame, no psychic powers — only pure love for Thee'). The Ramakrishna Ashrama appears among the masthead's fraternal orders, so the group had direct access to Mission publications.
The eulogy breaks into free verse — 'Tenuous as a sigh, tender as a flower' — the same devotional-poem register the review's memorials reach for at their climax, as in the Saint-Yves invocation of Nº 47.
The three paths — Wisdom, Devotion, Action — are the classical jnana, bhakti and karma yogas; the lecturer's counsel that devotion is preferable 'while the feeling of personality endures' reproduces Ramakrishna's own teaching that bhakti is the path for this age.
The succession scene is historical: Narendranath Datta — Swami Vivekananda — was designated by Ramakrishna before his death in August 1886 ('he is a roaring blaze' is from the recorded sayings), and the closing detail, the Master dying with Kali's name three times on his lips, is from the Mission's account of his last night. The article ends with the mantra OM MANI PADME HUM — Tibetan Buddhist, not Bengali — one more layer of the review's syncretism.
Rouxel's 'Kabbalistic Theory of Music' here reaches its 'continuation and end'. Rouxel was a contributor to Papus's Paris 'L'Initiation' in the 1890s; the Montevideo review, which took its very name from that journal, is translating the French run's back catalogue for its own readers.
'Numbers govern the world' — the conclusion turns Pythagorean: music as the bridge (Kant is quoted for it) between physics and metaphysics, and the lost 'synthetic Science' founded on Number as the Kabbalah proper. This is the same doctrine of the One differentiating into the many that the review teaches through the Tarot's twenty-two keys and the Archeometer's correspondences.
The parallel columns — Music and Theology — map the fundamental, its octave and its fifth onto Father, Son and Holy Spirit, with the Latin Credo quoted clause by clause. The bracketed commentary is Rouxel's own; the review transmits the Latin as printed, slips included.
Chateaubriand's line on the three ('a fraction that is not engendered and engenders all the others') is from 'Le Génie du christianisme'. The article closes the series by declaring music 'human and consequently metaphysical' — the aesthetic apologetics of 1802 pressed into kabbalistic service.
Surya's judicial astrology course reaches Neptune, 'the planet of Divinity', ninth in his planet-by-planet march through the houses. The delineations are standard early-twentieth-century textbook astrology (Alan Leo's school), with the period's moralised vocabulary intact — 'effeminate', 'dissolute', mediumship as danger — transmitted as printed.
House-by-house planetary delineation in exactly this format — planet, house, 'well aspected' versus 'afflicted' — is the practical method of The Light of Egypt's astrological chapters; Surya's course is the Montevideo group's equivalent of that Hermetic manual, and the shared Anglo-American astrological vocabulary shows both drawing on the same tradition.
→ thread:light_of_egypt_v1
With Neptune's twelve houses completed, only Pluto — discovered 1930, still absent from the course's canon — remains untaught; the course's planetary roster (Saturn through Neptune) is the classical-plus-Uranus-and-Neptune set of pre-war manuals.
The Suddha Dharma Mandalam was founded in Madras in 1915 by Sir Subramania Iyer ('Swami Subramanianda') with the theosophist T. M. Janardana; its edition of the Bhagavad Gita — attributed to the initiatic compiler 'Hamsa Yogi' — has 745 slokas in 26 chapters against the vulgate's 700 in 18, exactly the 745/620/57/67/1 distribution tabulated here. The review is serialising the Spanish version by 'G. Bruno' of the Mandalam's own commentary; the order also heads the masthead's list of fraternal bodies.
The anubandha-chatushtaya — subject, purpose, means and qualified aspirant — is the classical Sanskrit prologue-analysis applied by every Vedantic commentator; the Suddha synthesis compresses it to 'theme and aspirant', and the review's readers meet standard shastra method dressed in initiatic clothing.
The first verse of the Gita is read as pure allegory: Dharmakshetra and Kurukshetra as man's dense and subtle bodies, Kauravas and Pandavas as lower and higher nature, the whole question resolved into the Delphic KNOW THYSELF and 'as above, so below' — the Hermetic maxim welded directly onto the Sanskrit canon, which is the review's method in a single sentence.
The translator's footnote names names: 'It is known that René Guénon is anti-reincarnationist and anti-theosophist…' — the Montevideo circle knew exactly who 'Palingenius' was, and prints a signed dissent (the footnote defends reincarnation against him) while continuing to serialise his text. A remarkable document of critical transmission: the group publishes its source and its disagreement side by side.
The long quotations are from the Atmabodha ('Knowledge of the Spirit') attributed to Sankaracharya, which Guénon cites in the original French of 'Le Démiurge'; the rope-and-serpent illusion and the waking/dream/deep-sleep triad are Vedantic staples the review's readers would later meet again in its own courses.
Guénon's closing distinction between the higher and the lower Brahma — the latter 'nothing other than the Demiurge considered as the reflection of Being' — resolves the essay's whole argument: the creator-god of division is real only from inside the division. The review's own teaching on Maya and the two faces of the Absolute runs on the same rails.
The chromotherapy history is built from real figures: Foveau de Courmelles (French radiologist who coined the term), the red-light smallpox treatments of folk and medieval practice, General Augustus Pleasanton's 1871 blue-glass craze in Philadelphia, and Edwin Babbitt, whose 'Principles of Light and Color' (1878) is the fountainhead of Western colour-healing. Goethe's Farbenlehre supplies the epigraph-grade quotation.
The modern dossier continues with datable references: Regnault's colour experiments (1911–1924, Côte d'Azur médicale), the International College of Chromatics in England, Mangin's 1929 note to the Académie des Sciences, and the Lausanne radiesthesia congress of September 1934. The '1830' printed for Larvaron sits against the article's own chronology — likely 1930 — and is transmitted as printed with a Sic gloss.
The synthesis turns clinical colour-science into aura-reading: health as harmonic play of vibrations, illness as disharmony, and the clairvoyant diagnosis of mental, astral or physical origin. The three-body scheme is the same one the chromotherapy series established in Nº 47's twenty-point summary — the course is building a complete esoteric medicine.
The G∴E∴I∴D∴E∴ plate stands unchanged from Nº 47, with Sister UPASIKA's Buddhism course still on the roster.
The Buenos Aires book lists are likewise unchanged: four Martinist Library titles at Publicidad 'Ateneo' and the Kier list pairing Sevaka with Sédir and Hartmann.