La Iniciación: Mensuario del Grupo Independiente de Estudios Esotéricos
The Initiation: Monthly of the Independent Group of Esoteric Studies
La Iniciación · Año I, Nº 5 · September 1942
Gate passedSeeker and aboveModern transcription — not a facsimileGIDEE / Orden Martinista de América del SurOperator ruling: no copyright implications asserted for this work. Uruguay life+50 (Leo d. 1970 → PD 2020); US URAA restoration assessed at ~2041 in the collection plan and overridden by the operator.321 of 321 segments translated · 21 ppsha 2241fa433c87…
Volume I — May to December 1942editor’s preface to the volume
Eight numbers, from May to December 1942, printed in Montevideo by a body calling itself the Grupo Independiente de Estudios Esotéricos. The name is not incidental. Papus had founded a Groupe Indépendant d'Études Ésotériques in Paris in 1888 and given it a review called L'Initiation; Nº 6 of this magazine names him as its president and founder in so many words. What you are reading is a deliberate re-founding of that institution on the other side of the Atlantic, half a century later, with the same name and the same title over the door.
The first number sets out what the review means to be: the organ of an independent society of thought, open to criticism from its readers, "not a business either, nor anyone's means of livelihood", falling into "no particularism, and still less into any personalism". That claim is worth holding onto, because the volume keeps testing itself against it. A commentary on masonic ritual praises the symbols and then says plainly that the institution has forgotten what they mean. An article on Schopenhauer complains that philosophers and occultists each miss half of him. A poem on the second page rebukes the very piety the editorial has just described.
Four long series run through the volume and none of them finishes: Jehel's commentary on the masonic degrees, which reaches the raising of Hiram; Surya's astrology course, which builds one real chart for one real birth in Montevideo across six instalments; Asuri Kapila's course in the postures, with a Sanskrit glossary that reaches its seventy-third entry; and a treatise on the planetary hours that does conclude, in Nº 8, with Saturn and Jupiter. Threaded between them is something stranger — a Uruguayan woman signing herself Maya, who went to India, sat on the floor of Sri Ramana Maharshi's hall, and wrote it down. He asked her, as she left, whether she would visit the temple at Madura. She said the chance had gone. A railway official then sent her eight hundred kilometres in the wrong direction and she arrived at Madura. The magazine gives that sequence three issues and lets the reader draw the conclusion.
The volume closes in French, with Saint-Martin's "Le Cimetière d'Amboise" — begun in Nº 6, continued in Nº 7, still unfinished at the end of Nº 8.
On the apparatus. Every page of this volume carries commentary: 392 notes across 179 pages, marked by evidence tier, saying where a claim has been checked against a text the Press holds and where it has not. Quotations have been verified where verification was possible. Dante is misquoted here — nostri for vostri, which turns a rebuke of humanity into a shared observation. The "Prayer of Saint Francis" on p. 9 of Nº 4 is not by Francis; it first appears anonymously in 1912. Three arithmetical faults in the astrology course are identified, including one that does not affect its result and is marked as such. Where a contributor is right, that is recorded too, and he often is: the Gita is quoted accurately, the elemental triangles are correctly assigned, Montevideo's coordinates are right, and the mean daily motion of the Sun is given correct to the arcsecond.
On what is withheld. Five passages in this volume are not reproduced, amounting to 1,153 characters — about two hundredths of one per cent of the text. Each is marked where it stood, with the reason. The Press does not reproduce racial theory, racial-improvement doctrine, or period race-language used in pseudo-historical claims. Nothing is removed silently and nothing else has been altered; passages that merely use the vocabulary of 1942 while arguing against racial distinction — and there are several — stand as printed.
On the medical claims. The courses in this volume promise cures: of sterility, of gallstones, of arteriosclerosis, of spinal deformity. Nº 7 prints two clinical reports describing a man whose grey hair, baldness and wrinkles are said to have reversed over eleven years. These are reproduced because they are what the magazine said, and they are endorsed by nobody. Read them as evidence of what this readership was invited to believe.
primarypage 3
1discípulos suyos a diversos Maestros, como el Maharishi, Sivananda y otros, cuando le parece que el discípulo necesita perfeccionar alguna Yoga o vía especial con un Maestro que la posea a la perfección.
2Es lo que hacemos en Occidente también en LAS VERDADERAS ESCUELAS INICIÁTICAS, como el Martinismo, en las cuales vemos un Papus con tres Maestros: Uno Espiritual (Amo – tipo Maharishi, Aurobindo).
3Uno Intelectual (Saint Ives d’Alveydre – tipo Aurobindo) Uno de Práctica (Peter Davidson – tipo Sivananda).
4Y si me permiten hacer comparaciones y atreverme a parecer juzgar a Seres que, todos ELLOS, están tan por encima de mi pobre personalidad, es porque, por lo menos, SE CON SEGURIDAD que la vía es esa; la unión.
5La colaboración es la regla, tanto entre Maestros, como entre Maestros y discípulos, como entre los discípulos y las escuelas.
6Por eso, todo aquel que se rehúsa a la unión, a la colaboración, a la cohesión, está fuera de la vía por sabio o santo que parezca.
7Esa es la lección práctica que la Vida de los Venerables Maestros de Oriente y Occidente nos pone siempre bajo los ojos.
8Mis queridos lectores no deben creer tampoco que un Maestro Místico, como el Venerable Maharishi o el Maestro Amo, sean seres que solamente oran o piensan.
9Si bien es cierto que su VÍA especial es la meditación, y llevan su pensamiento a una concentración y altura de la cual difícilmente podemos hacernos una idea, es también verdad que su cultura es prodigiosa; basta verificar que el propio Maharishi dice que el camino es “volver a encontrar y poseer todo el CONOCIMIENTO de los primitivos Rishis”, para comprender que no se debe creer que su elevación sea debida a algunas respiraciones o meditaciones.
10Todos los Maestros han seguido la misma Vía de Preparación: SABER, es decir, reunir las bases de una comprensión intelectual, de un conocimiento inmenso, capaz de servir de base a un QUERER bien orientado y llevado en el sentido de preparar CUERPO, ALMA y ESPÍRITU a la conquista de esa LUZ INTERNA, parte de la realización que en Occidente se halla oculta bajo la palabra OSAR.
11Hecha esta etapa, el QUERER, OSAR Y CALLAR se manifiestan como exteriorización del SABER sintético y real que entonces representan, y cada Maestro escoge la Vía que más adecuada a su Venerable Personalidad les parece, para guiar con más facilidad a los discípulos que tengan ANALOGÍA con su propia modulación, que son de su Rayo, como se dice en la India.
12No es sin razón que he empezado estos artículos sobre las Venerables Personalidades de los Maestros con el Maharishi, después con Amo, ahora con Aurobindo.
13Sigo un trazado perfectamente meditado, pues en el próximo artículo deseo hablaros de Papus, por considerarlos como representando el Cuaternario, el Realizador de las Vías Superiores manifestadas por los Tres Maestros de que ya os hablé y que son, probablemente, los Tres superiores a Él.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
derivedpage 3
1disciples of his to various Masters, such as the Maharishi, Sivananda and others, when it seems to him that the disciple needs to perfect some particular Yoga or way with a Master who possesses it to perfection.
2It is what we do in the West also in THE TRUE INITIATIC SCHOOLS, such as Martinism, in which we see a Papus with three Masters: one Spiritual (Amo — of the type of Maharishi, Aurobindo).
3One Intellectual (Saint-Yves d'Alveydre — of the type of Aurobindo). One of Practice (Peter Davidson — of the type of Sivananda).
4And if you permit me to make comparisons and to venture to seem to judge Beings who are, ALL OF THEM, so far above my poor person, it is because at least I KNOW WITH CERTAINTY that the way is this: union.
5Collaboration is the rule, as much between Masters as between Masters and disciples, and between disciples and schools.
6For this reason, whoever refuses union, collaboration, cohesion, is outside the way, however wise or holy he may appear.
7That is the practical lesson which the Life of the Venerable Masters of East and West always sets before our eyes.
8Nor should my dear readers believe that a Mystical Master such as the Venerable Maharishi or the Master Amo are beings who only pray or think.
9While it is true that their special WAY is meditation, and that they carry their thought to a concentration and a height of which we can hardly form an idea, it is also true that their culture is prodigious; it is enough to note that the Maharishi himself says the road is “to find again and to possess all the KNOWLEDGE of the primitive Rishis”, to understand that one must not believe their elevation due to a few breathings or meditations.
10All the Masters have followed the same Way of Preparation: TO KNOW — that is, to gather the foundations of an intellectual understanding, of an immense knowledge capable of serving as the basis for a well-oriented WILLING, carried in the sense of preparing BODY, SOUL and SPIRIT for the conquest of that INNER LIGHT, the part of the realisation which in the West lies hidden under the word TO DARE.
11This stage accomplished, the TO WILL, TO DARE and TO KEEP SILENT are manifested as the exteriorisation of the synthetic and real KNOWING which they then represent; and each Master chooses the Way that seems most fitted to his Venerable Personality, so as to guide with greater ease the disciples who have ANALOGY with his own modulation — who are of his Ray, as they say in India.
12It is not without reason that I have begun these articles on the Venerable Personalities of the Masters with the Maharishi, then with Amo, and now with Aurobindo.
13I follow a perfectly meditated plan, for in the next article I wish to speak to you of Papus, considering them as representing the Quaternary — the Realiser of the Higher Ways manifested by the Three Masters of whom I have already spoken, and who are probably the Three above Him.
Our translation, period-faithful. Citable as our translation, never as the source.
Commentarywhole issue ·
Comparative[P-V]comparison_testableini:1.5:1:008
Ramana is compared to Saint-Martin and Jacob Boehme as the West's nearest equivalents. Both are now held in full — Saint-Martin's two major works, and ten works of Boehme — so the comparison can be tested rather than accepted. It is also a revealing choice: Jehel reaches for the mystics of direct interior knowledge, not for the ceremonial tradition his own Order descends from.
→ thread:aurora_boehme_sparrow
Historical[P-V]ini:1.5:4:001
The institutional architecture, stated plainly and only here: GIDEE for elementary theory, the Martinist Order of South America for higher theory and practice, and the Kabbalistic Order of the Rose-Cross as synthesis. Three bodies, one progression. This is the clearest single statement in the run of how the organisation understood its own shape.
Comparative[I]ini:1.5:2:010
Aurobindo's total surrender to the Mother is read as “EXACTLY what Papus taught, just as he received it from his Master AMO”. The equation is asserted, not argued. It is characteristic of this review's comparative method: resemblance at the level of the demand made on the disciple is taken as identity of doctrine.
Historical[S-V]ini:1.5:1:012
The biographical detail on Aurobindo is accurate: educated in England from seven to twenty-one, King's College Cambridge, a year in prison in 1908–09 at Alipore, then withdrawal to French India — Pondicherry — and the abandonment of politics. The date given as 1923 for his entry into public life is wrong by some fifteen years; his nationalist activity belongs to 1905–1910.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.5:7:008
The Hiramic legend, given in full with the ritual actions that accompany its telling — the rule to the throat, the square to the chest, the mallet to the forehead, the candidate laid in the coffin. Printing the working of a degree ceremony in a public monthly is a considerable disclosure, and Jehel does it deliberately while withholding the words themselves.
Historical[P-V]ini:1.5:11:013
A complete history of Uruguayan official time from 1908 to 1941, with exact offsets — needed because a chart cannot be cast without true local time. Montevideo ran true local time from 1908, moved to four hours west in 1920, adopted seasonal adjustment in 1923, and from 2 August 1941 stood 44 minutes 51 seconds ahead of true local. Useful well beyond astrology.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.5:17:002
Kabir states e^(2πi) = 1 and, correctly, that e^(iπ) = −1. The mathematics is sound throughout — the derivation of e as the limit of (1 + 1/n)^n, the damped oscillation of a steel blade as a negative exponent, the reading of the exponential as a law of growth. Where he moves from mathematics to metaphysics the reasoning is his own, but he does not misstate the mathematics to get there.
Cross-estate[C]colour_namedini:1.5:20:003
The colour of the Sun hour, named: ORANGE, “a vital tonic for the body and a purifying tonic for the emotional soul”, directed at another person. Sacred Synthesis places orange at Step 3 as “a dynamic balance between aggressive red and passive yellow” — a mediating term between the vital and the affective in both. The closest correspondence between the two systems, and it is stated in almost the same words.
→ hour-sol
Cross-estate[C]colour_namedini:1.5:21:002
The colour of the Mars hour: PURE RUBY RED, to fortify vital tone, mental activity and force of will. Sacred Synthesis Step 5 is the “Intense Ruby Red Square”, named for crystallised permanence. The colour term matches exactly — not red, but ruby red — across a hundred years and two unrelated frames. Recorded as a correspondence, not as evidence of transmission.
→ hour-marte
Cross-estate[P-V]colour_namedini:1.5:20:013
The colour of the Venus hour: ROSE, sent as “a message of peace, of affection, of encouragement and of gentleness”. This completes the three colours the treatise names — orange for the Sun, rose for Venus, ruby red for Mars — and all three are projected outward at a named person rather than contemplated. That direction of travel is the sharpest divergence from the twelve-colour sequence, where the colour arises unbidden and is not chosen.
→ hour-venus
Comparative[I]same_handlingini:1.5:14:006
The asana course again moves from technique into therapeutic claim — that constipation can be cured radically without laxatives, and most illnesses of the liver, kidneys, pancreas, stomach and intestine improved and then cured. Published as the source has it, with the standing caveat; the Press does not adopt the claims.
Jehel bases the mundane readings of the hours on “the opinion of the Martinist astrologer Julevno”, reserving his own observation for the rest. IDENTIFIED: a real Spanish-language astrological author, catalogued for one work, Nuevo Tratado de Astrología Práctica (Humanitas). NOT HELD: no pre-1942 edition is digitised or catalogued in the sources reachable here — archive.org returns nothing under the name, Open Library records only a 2003 edition without full text, and Gallica and HathiTrust refuse programmatic access. The chain for the planetary hours runs Julevno → Jehel → this corpus, the first link named but not readable.
Papus is given three masters, each with a function: Amo (Philippe) spiritual, Saint-Yves d'Alveydre intellectual, and Peter Davidson practical. Davidson is the co-founder of the Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor — which places the H.B. of L. current directly inside the transmission this review claims. It also explains why Burgoyne's Light of Egypt, the H.B. of L.'s own text, is named in twelve issues.
→ thread:light_of_egypt_v1
Cross-estate[P-V]citation_verifiedini:1.5:18:021
A second exact citation to the Papus volume now held — Traité méthodique, Volume I, p. 263 and following. Checked: Papus does set out the seed placed in a matrix, the conditions of germination and the emergence of the plant, in that region of the volume, with an internal cross-reference to p. 273. The citation is sound. The crystal of sodium chloride is not in Papus — that example is Kabir's own extension of the argument into the mineral kingdom.
→ thread:papus_traite_methodique
Cross-estate[P-V]ini:1.5:8:015
French verse closing the page, attributed at 8:016 to "el Maestro ELIPHA LEVI" — Eliphas Lévi, not Saint-Martin. It is easy to mistake for the Cimetière d'Amboise serialisation that begins one issue later; the two are different poems by different authors, and the magazine prints both untranslated.
Historical[R]ini:1.5:8:016
Eliphas Lévi (Alphonse-Louis Constant, 1810–1875) is named as the author. The estate holds Waite's translation of his Transcendental Magic; the verse quoted here is not from that work, and its source has not been identified.
Cross-estate[P-V]ini:1.5:16:014
Here the magazine names the Kybalion outright, and quotes it correctly: "While it is true that All is in the All, it is no less true that the All is in All." This completes a thread running the length of Volume I. The Kybalion's first principle appears as an unattributed epigraph in Nº 1 p. 15, again unattributed as the "Purely Philosophical Plane" in Nº 3 p. 7, correctly named here by Kabir in Nº 5 — and then, in Nº 7 p. 20, a different contributor credits that same doctrine to the Emerald Tablet. The correct attribution was available in the magazine's own pages two issues earlier. The error was not ignorance of the source; it was one writer reaching past it for an older authority.
Historical[P-V]ini:1.5:16:002
Kabir, A∴M∴ is the magazine's mathematician. He writes here on π and e, co-signs the Wronski article on algorithmic theory in Nº 8 p. 15, and his citations of Papus elsewhere in the run have been checked word for word against the acquired volumes and found exact. Where he is the author, the sourcing is reliable.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.5:16:005
The definition of e is correct: the limit of (1 + 1/n) raised to the n as n grows without bound. The observation that follows — that as n grows the base folds back toward unity while the exponent runs away, and the two motions settle on a finite number — is a genuinely good intuitive gloss, not decoration.
Comparative[C]ini:1.5:16:008
The reading of the sign of the exponent — e to a negative power where a process is retarded, positive where it needs a stimulus, zero where it needs neither — is sound as a description of how exponentials appear in growth and decay laws. The metaphysics laid over it, that this expresses "the law of symmetry and justice", is the author's own and is offered as analogy.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.5:5:003
The Middle Chamber is set for the third degree: nine lights, black hangings, skulls and crossed bones, silver tears, and a coffin at the centre. Nº 1 p. 8 had described the candidate glimpsing this scene through a lifted blindfold in the first degree; here the reader is inside it. The instalments are building one room across four issues.
Comparative[I]ini:1.5:5:010
The examination procedure is neatly observed: the Wardens pass along the ranks and each Brother turns to face them, so that those not yet examined have their backs to those who have. The article notes that this makes deception impossible — a piece of practical stagecraft rather than symbolism, and the writer is alert to the difference.
Comparative[I]ini:1.5:6:006
The trap is well told: the Candidate is asked how he comes to the Temple and answers "by the password", which no Companion could lawfully know — and the indignation is resolved when it emerges that he expects his Conductor to give it for him. The ceremony stages an accusation and then dissolves it, which is the whole shape of the Hiram degree.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.5:6:015
The three marches are given in sequence — Apprentice, Companion, Master — and the article makes the point that together they compose a single general march. That cumulative reading is consistent with Nº 3 p. 6, where the Apprentice's three sliding steps were said never to leave the central line.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.5:9:017
Rule 16 is arithmetically sound and worth spelling out: daily motion is divided by 96 because there are 96 quarter-hours in twenty-four hours. The course then multiplies by the number of quarter-hours since Greenwich noon. It is a clean way to interpolate an ephemeris without logarithms, and Rule 18 immediately offers the logarithmic method as the more exact alternative.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.5:9:010
The longitude correction is correct: four minutes of time for each degree of longitude, added when west and subtracted when east. Montevideo being west of Greenwich, the addition is what a Uruguayan reader needs, and the course is consistently written for where its students actually are.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.5:10:011
The table of mean daily motions checks out. The Sun is given 0º 59′ 08″ per day, which is the standard mean value, and 0º 2′ 27″ per hour — 59′ 08″ divided by 24 is 2′ 28″, so the hourly figure is right to the arcsecond. Mercury at 1º 49′ and Venus at 1º 15′ are serviceable averages for a course that has just offered a more exact method.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.5:9:006
Intercepted signs are correctly explained — a sign wholly contained within a house because another sign occupies two successive cusps — and the instruction to place them in the middle of the house is the standard remedy. It is exactly the situation a chart cast for 35º South produces often, which is why the course stops for it.
Historical[P-V]ini:1.5:12:005
The coordinates given for Montevideo — 56º west, 35º south — are accurate (the city lies at about 56º 11′ W, 34º 54′ S). The worked example that runs from here through Nº 8 is a real chart for a real place, and the course's southern-hemisphere rule from Nº 4 p. 8 is about to be exercised on it.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.5:13:002
Salabhasana is correctly named the locust posture and correctly described — prone, arms extended, head and legs raised on a retained breath, held five to ten seconds, repeated six or seven times. The two variants with the hands beneath the abdomen are the standard preparatory forms.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.5:15:002
The three phases of the breath are defined accurately: puraka inhalation, kumbhaka retention, rechaka exhalation, together constituting pranayama. The course has been using these terms since Nº 2's glossary and now stops to define them properly — a good instinct, since it has just made the reader hold a breath in a posture.
Comparative[C]ini:1.5:15:005
Pranayama is here assigned to Hatha Yoga, which the magazine's own glossary in Nº 2 called "an inferior form of Yoga". The course keeps teaching what its glossary disparages, and never reconciles the two — a small sign that the glossary was compiled from a different source than the instalments.
Cross-estate[P-V]ini:1.5:4:001
The issue prints the Order's own diagram of its descent, and it is the single most compact statement of the lineage in the run. Maharshi at the head as spiritual power of the East; Aurobindo to one side as Karma-Yogin acting East to West; Papus to the other as disinterested action acting West to East; Amo below as spiritual power of the West. Joining them, la corriente — the current. Four of these are four of the five Masters that Nº 10 p. 17 names as most often seen or felt by members of the Order, eighteen months later. The diagram is now in the reader's imagery layer.