La Iniciación: Mensuario del Grupo Independiente de Estudios Esotéricos
The Initiation: Monthly of the Independent Group of Esoteric Studies
La Iniciación · Año I, Nº 2 · June 1942
Gate passedSeeker and aboveModern transcription — not a facsimileGIDEE / Orden Martinista de América del SurOperator ruling: no copyright implications asserted for this work. Uruguay life+50 (Leo d. 1970 → PD 2020); US URAA restoration assessed at ~2041 in the collection plan and overridden by the operator.451 of 451 segments translated · 23 ppsha b89775a8c701…
Volume I — May to December 1942editor’s preface to the volume
Eight numbers, from May to December 1942, printed in Montevideo by a body calling itself the Grupo Independiente de Estudios Esotéricos. The name is not incidental. Papus had founded a Groupe Indépendant d'Études Ésotériques in Paris in 1888 and given it a review called L'Initiation; Nº 6 of this magazine names him as its president and founder in so many words. What you are reading is a deliberate re-founding of that institution on the other side of the Atlantic, half a century later, with the same name and the same title over the door.
The first number sets out what the review means to be: the organ of an independent society of thought, open to criticism from its readers, "not a business either, nor anyone's means of livelihood", falling into "no particularism, and still less into any personalism". That claim is worth holding onto, because the volume keeps testing itself against it. A commentary on masonic ritual praises the symbols and then says plainly that the institution has forgotten what they mean. An article on Schopenhauer complains that philosophers and occultists each miss half of him. A poem on the second page rebukes the very piety the editorial has just described.
Four long series run through the volume and none of them finishes: Jehel's commentary on the masonic degrees, which reaches the raising of Hiram; Surya's astrology course, which builds one real chart for one real birth in Montevideo across six instalments; Asuri Kapila's course in the postures, with a Sanskrit glossary that reaches its seventy-third entry; and a treatise on the planetary hours that does conclude, in Nº 8, with Saturn and Jupiter. Threaded between them is something stranger — a Uruguayan woman signing herself Maya, who went to India, sat on the floor of Sri Ramana Maharshi's hall, and wrote it down. He asked her, as she left, whether she would visit the temple at Madura. She said the chance had gone. A railway official then sent her eight hundred kilometres in the wrong direction and she arrived at Madura. The magazine gives that sequence three issues and lets the reader draw the conclusion.
The volume closes in French, with Saint-Martin's "Le Cimetière d'Amboise" — begun in Nº 6, continued in Nº 7, still unfinished at the end of Nº 8.
On the apparatus. Every page of this volume carries commentary: 392 notes across 179 pages, marked by evidence tier, saying where a claim has been checked against a text the Press holds and where it has not. Quotations have been verified where verification was possible. Dante is misquoted here — nostri for vostri, which turns a rebuke of humanity into a shared observation. The "Prayer of Saint Francis" on p. 9 of Nº 4 is not by Francis; it first appears anonymously in 1912. Three arithmetical faults in the astrology course are identified, including one that does not affect its result and is marked as such. Where a contributor is right, that is recorded too, and he often is: the Gita is quoted accurately, the elemental triangles are correctly assigned, Montevideo's coordinates are right, and the mean daily motion of the Sun is given correct to the arcsecond.
On what is withheld. Five passages in this volume are not reproduced, amounting to 1,153 characters — about two hundredths of one per cent of the text. Each is marked where it stood, with the reason. The Press does not reproduce racial theory, racial-improvement doctrine, or period race-language used in pseudo-historical claims. Nothing is removed silently and nothing else has been altered; passages that merely use the vocabulary of 1942 while arguing against racial distinction — and there are several — stand as printed.
On the medical claims. The courses in this volume promise cures: of sterility, of gallstones, of arteriosclerosis, of spinal deformity. Nº 7 prints two clinical reports describing a man whose grey hair, baldness and wrinkles are said to have reversed over eleven years. These are reproduced because they are what the magazine said, and they are endorsed by nobody. Read them as evidence of what this readership was invited to believe.
primarypage 6
1hilachas que son parte de la cuerda total, a la que forman en conjunto y también son, por lo tanto, una partícula de aquella Gran Verdad o Corriente Iniciática Universal que la propia Cuerda representa.
2Para terminar con lo que las paredes contienen, debemos todavía considerar tres importantes símbolos: En la pared del Oriente, sitiada detrás del Altar del Venerable, se ven, a la derecha del Venerable, el SOL, y a su izquierda, la LUNA, o sea los dos astros que más directamente influyen en la vida terrestre.
3El SOL, dador de vida y fuente de toda fuerza vital y positiva en nuestra manifestación terrestre.
4Fuente de Luz EMANADA.
5La LUNA, fuente de la Luz REFLEJADA, gobernando todo lo pasivo y receptivo, toda la faz material de la cosas que “contienen” la vida del Sol en nuestro pequeño planeta.
6Sintéticamente: el Sol y la Luna muestran la Ley de Polarización en su aspecto más REAL, más vivo, en sus propias fuentes, para que el Iniciado medite y sepa de dónde debe sacar las energías.
7Conforme al Polo que dirige sus esfuerzos.
8Entre el Sol y la Luna, desde la moldura donde está la cuerda, y exactamente del punto central de dicha cuerda, baja el cortinado que constituye la decoración del trono donde se sienta el Venerable.
9Y en la parte superior de tal cortina, formando un triángulo equilátero con el Sol y la Luna, se ve, en casi todos los Ritos, un triángulo luminoso, de vidrio azul o blanco.
10Alumbrado por una pequeña lámpara detrás del vidrio.
11Sobre el transparente luminoso está pintado, según los ritos, uno de los tres símbolos siguientes, que significan la misma cosa, vista en diversas alturas: O una letra “G”, con rayos, imagen de toda creación, como veremos al estudiar el grado de Compañero.
12O el Tetragrama, en letras caldeas o arameas: Iod-Hé-Vau-Hé, nombre cuaternario del Gran Arquitecto del Universo, cuyo significado oculto es la clave de todo estudio cabalístico superior.
13O la letra aramea “I” (iod), que tanto en las iniciaciones hebreas, egipcias, como de la vieja India, era el punto de partida de toda manifestación creadora.
14Letra inicial de Iod-Hé- Vau-Hé, de INRI, del nombre de Jesús, etc….
15Verificamos así que, sea uno u otro de los tres símbolos, la Logia Masónica siempre coloca, encima del Venerable, una imagen representando la Suprema y Universal Sabiduría Divina, interpretada por la mente humana a través de símbolos milenarios.
16Bajemos un escalón en la observación; lleguemos ahora a la parte de la Realización Humana de tal Doctrina sobre la Tierra, es decir, en el plano humano.
17Ya vimos que el “suelo” sobre el que la Humanidad va a “operar” (obrar) es aquella mezcla alternante de Bien y de Mal simbolizada por la pavimentación blanca y negra.
18Sobre ese “suelo” hay “muebles”, o sea, “lugares fijos”, funciones en otras palabras.
19Debajo del Símbolo Supremo (triángulo luminoso) está el trono sonde se sienta el Venerable, que representa la Sabiduría Suprema, manifestada, en el plano humano, por el Hierofante Supremo el Templo.
20A su derecha e izquierda, cerca de las columnas situadas a ambos lados de la puerta, en el otro extremo del Templo, están situados los altares donde se sientan los VIGILANTES.
21Cerca de la Columna “J” está el Primer Vigilante, representación de la Fuerza en todas sus manifestaciones; fuerza espiritual, fuerza moral o astral, fuerza física,
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
derivedpage 6
1threads which are part of the total cord, which together they form, and which are therefore also a particle of that Great Truth or Universal Initiatic Current which the Cord itself represents.
2To finish with what the walls contain, we must still consider three important symbols: On the wall of the Orient, situated behind the Altar of the Venerable, one sees, to the right of the Venerable, the SUN, and to his left, the MOON, that is, the two heavenly bodies that most directly influence terrestrial life.
3The SUN, giver of life and source of all vital and positive force in our terrestrial manifestation.
4Source of EMANATED Light.
5The MOON, source of REFLECTED Light, governing all that is passive and receptive, the whole material face of the things that “contain” the life of the Sun on our small planet.
6Synthetically: the Sun and the Moon show the Law of Polarisation in its most REAL, most living aspect, at its own sources, so that the Initiate may meditate and know whence he ought to draw his energies.
7According to the Pole that directs his efforts.
8Between the Sun and the Moon, from the moulding where the cord is, and exactly from the central point of that cord, descends the curtain that constitutes the decoration of the throne where the Venerable is seated.
9And on the upper part of such a curtain, forming an equilateral triangle with the Sun and the Moon, one sees, in almost all the Rites, a luminous triangle, of blue or white glass.
10Lit by a small lamp behind the glass.
11Upon the luminous transparency there is painted, according to the rite, one of the three following symbols, which signify the same thing seen at different heights: Either a letter “G”, with rays, image of all creation, as we shall see when studying the degree of Companion.
12Or the Tetragram, in Chaldean or Aramaic letters: Iod-Hé-Vau-Hé, the quaternary name of the Great Architect of the Universe, whose occult meaning is the key to all higher kabbalistic study.
13Or the Aramaic letter “I” (iod), which in the Hebrew and Egyptian initiations, as in those of ancient India, was the point of departure of all creative manifestation.
14The initial letter of Iod-Hé-Vau-Hé, of INRI, of the name of Jesus, etc….
15We thus verify that, whichever of the three symbols it be, the Masonic Lodge always places above the Venerable an image representing the Supreme and Universal Divine Wisdom, interpreted by the human mind through symbols thousands of years old.
16Let us descend one step in our observation; let us come now to the part concerning the Human Realisation of such Doctrine upon the Earth, that is to say, on the human plane.
17We have already seen that the “floor” upon which Humanity is to “operate” (to work) is that alternating mixture of Good and Evil symbolised by the white and black paving.
18Upon that “floor” there are “furnishings”, that is to say “fixed places”, functions in other words.
19Beneath the Supreme Symbol (the luminous triangle) is the throne where the Venerable is seated, who represents Supreme Wisdom manifested, on the human plane, by the Supreme Hierophant of the Temple.
20To his right and left, near the columns situated on either side of the door, at the other end of the Temple, are placed the altars where the WARDENS are seated.
21Near the Column “J” is the First Warden, representation of Force in all its manifestations; spiritual force, moral or astral force, physical force,
Our translation, period-faithful. Citable as our translation, never as the source.
Commentarywhole issue ·
Historical[S-V]ini:1.2:1:005
Ramana Maharshi (1879–1950) was living at Arunachala when these accounts were written, and would remain there until his death eight years later. The article is therefore reportage on a living teacher, not hagiography of a historical one — which is unusual for this corpus, most of whose subjects are long dead.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.2:3:006
The question "Who am I?" — ātma-vichāra — is Ramana's central method, and it is reported here accurately and without embellishment. Set beside the elaborate technical apparatus of the astrology and asana courses in the same issue, its bareness is conspicuous: the periodical prints both without remarking on the contrast.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.2:3:009
Patanjali is quoted as "Yoga is the prevention of chitta from taking diverse forms — vrittis", which renders Yoga Sūtra I.2, yogaś citta-vṛtti-nirodhaḥ. The rendering is competent. The same definition is repeated in Nº 3's asana course, indicating a shared source among the contributors rather than independent translation.
Historical[S-V]ini:1.2:17:010
Edwin Babbitt (1828–1905), author of The Principles of Light and Colour (1878), the founding text of chromotherapy. Bernardi is not inventing a system but transmitting an American one already sixty years old, and presents it as science catching up with esoteric doctrine rather than the reverse.
Cross-estate[C]crosswalkedini:1.2:18:009
Colour projected into the aura of a subject who may be "present or at a variable distance", every projection closing on snow white. This is the operator-directed use of colour that the Press's crosswalk sets against the twelve-colour sequence, where colour arises unbidden on a white ground and is not chosen at all. The shared ground is white; the divergence is who chooses.
→ chromotherapy-method
Historical[P-V]ini:1.2:19:021
Leo de Mascheville scoring, in print, the Saturn–Uranus forecast he published in Nº 1 one month earlier. Whatever the merits of the scoring — the events cited are broadly drawn and the criteria are set after the fact — the practice of publishing a dated prediction and then returning to it publicly is the review's own, and can be checked against the full run.
Comparative[I]ini:1.2:14:016
Kundalini described as a power "which electricity and magnetism are no more than manifestations of". The identification of subtle force with the newly-understood physical forces is characteristic of occultism after the 1890s; it recurs in this corpus wherever a traditional term needs a modern warrant.
Comparative[C]ini:1.2:2:006
Ramana's response to being stoned by boys — caressing them on coming out of meditation — is the kind of detail that survives translation between hagiographic traditions unchanged. The same episode is told in the Ashram's own literature; the review is transmitting an established account, not reporting a fresh one.
Historical[S-V]ini:1.2:2:018
Ramana's mother Alagammal remaining at the ashram as her son's disciple rather than reclaiming him is historically attested; she died there in 1922 and her shrine became the Matrubhuteswara temple. The review's telling — that the Divine Light proved stronger than a mother's love — is the tradition's own reading of the fact.
Cross-estate[P-V]ini:1.2:5:001
The Temple of the Apprentice is described in full: the black-and-white floor, red walls, blue vault, the cord of 81 knots, the two columns. This is the masonic material the Martinist commentary builds on, and it is set out here in enough detail that the later degrees can be followed without outside reference.
Comparative[P-V]epigraph_fromini:1.2:8:011
Three sentences of Louis-Claude de Saint-Martin quoted as epigraph — on the triangle, on material fact bearing intellectual truth, and on the revivification of the will as the chief task of guilty beings. Saint-Martin's Des erreurs et de la vérité and Tableau naturel are both now held, so these epigraphs can be traced to their context rather than left as detached aphorisms.
→ thread:stmartin_erreurs_verite
Cross-estate[P-V]transcribesini:1.2:9:001
Surya's course proceeds by transcribing Papus at length — “PAPUS continues” — rather than by exposition. The course is therefore a translation project as much as a teaching one, and its fidelity can be measured once the Traité Méthodique named in Nº 4 is held.
→ thread:traite_science_occulte_papus
Comparative[C]ini:1.2:15:015
The four paths — Karma, Bhakti, Raja and Jnana — are declared complementary rather than antagonistic, each assigned a function: Karma removes evil, Bhakti destroys hatred, Raja concentrates the mind, Jnana removes ignorance. The scheme is Vivekananda's, and had been circulating in the West for fifty years by 1942.
Historical[P-V]ini:1.2:8:014
A poem signed Martha S.M. — one of the few women's bylines in the run outside Maya, and the only literary rather than doctrinal one in the early issues. Recorded because the roster of contributors is thin on attributable women and each instance matters to it.
Historical[P-V]ini:1.2:10:024
The course states its own simplification — Houses and Signs are treated as coinciding, which is true only for a birth in the first degree of Aries — and promises to correct it later. It does: Nº 6 and Nº 7 work a real chart where the cusps fall mid-sign, and Nº 8 places the planets accordingly.
Cross-estate[P-V]ini:1.2:12:003
The Dante is misquoted, and the change matters. The magazine prints "Lo cielo i nostri movimenti inizia" — heaven initiates our movements. Dante wrote vostri, your movements: the speaker is Marco Lombardo, a soul in Purgatory rebuking the living for blaming the stars for their own faults. The Press's held Divine Comedy has it at Purgatory XVI, p. 193 — "The sky begins your movements… For good and evil, light is granted ye." Changing your to our turns a rebuke aimed at humanity into a statement the writer shares, which is precisely the opposite of the passage's point about responsibility. The Italian is corrupt elsewhere too ("ch´lo" for "ch'i' 'l"), so this may be a compositor rather than the contributor.
Historical[P-V]ini:1.2:12:005
The reference is exact: Purgatorio XVI, line 73 and following. The magazine cites its sources by canto and line more carefully than most of its contemporaries, which makes checking possible — and, here, makes the misquotation visible.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.2:4:003
Jehel's three-step aphorism is the compressed form of the doctrine the whole run teaches: he who thinks daily more of others than himself does not yet know where the Way lies; he who thinks much of others has found the Way; he who never thinks of himself is the Way. The progression from finding to being is the point, and it recurs at Nº 8 p. 3 as the equilibrium of the Initiate.
Comparative[C]ini:1.2:6:005
Sun and Moon as emanated and reflected light, flanking the Orient wall, are read as the Law of Polarisation "at its own sources". The article consistently treats masonic furniture as a diagram of forces rather than as decoration — its governing method throughout.
Cross-estate[C]ini:1.2:6:012
The three alternatives painted on the luminous triangle — the letter G, the Tetragrammaton, or the single Iod — are said to signify the same thing seen at different heights. The Iod is then linked to INRI and to the name of Jesus. That the same quaternary Name is expounded again in Nº 8 p. 2, as the four Orders of Knowledge, shows how central it is to the magazine's scheme.
Comparative[C]ini:1.2:6:013
Calling Iod an "Aramaic letter" and assigning it to "the Hebrew and Egyptian initiations, as in those of ancient India" flattens three distinct traditions into one lineage. The claim is the article's, not the evidence's, and is characteristic of the period's comparative method.
Historical[P-V]ini:1.2:7:002
Jakin and Boaz are correctly placed and correctly assigned — J to force and the positive pole, B to beauty and form — and the transliteration "BOHAZ" is a variant rather than an error. The pillars are those of 1 Kings 7:21, and the masonic reading of them as a polarity is standard.
Comparative[I]ini:1.2:7:004
The observation is genuinely acute: Masonry names the third pillar not Matter or Form but Beauty, so that the initiate cannot conceive realisation apart from harmony. The article draws a moral consequence out of a choice of vocabulary, which is its best mode.
Historical[P-V]ini:1.2:7:011
The point is made plainly and is accurate: the volume on the altar "ought to be" all the sacred scriptures of humanity, but modern Masonry "for special reasons" uses only the Bible, opened at the Gospel of John. The gap between what the symbol requires and what the practice delivers is the article's standing complaint.
Historical[P-V]ini:1.2:10:002
The convention is correctly explained: the astrological chart is drawn facing the noon Sun, so South is at the top — the reverse of a geographical map, which is drawn as though facing North. Beginners confuse the two constantly, and the article stops to say so.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.2:10:016
The arithmetic is right: twelve divisions of thirty degrees, a complete rotation in twenty-four hours, therefore one division every two hours. The course is careful with its numbers throughout Volume I, and the Wheel of Fortune calculation in Nº 8 checks out digit by digit.
Historical[P-V]ini:1.2:10:018
A candid sentence, and worth marking: "The reader already knows, of course, that it is the Earth which turns around the Sun… but we keep the language of appearances, useful for the understanding of Astrology." The geocentric frame is declared a convenience, not a cosmology — the same declaration made in Nº 1 p. 12.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.2:11:008
The precession point is substantially right and unusually honest for an astrology course: because of precession the Sun no longer enters the constellation Aries at the equinox but around the middle of April, and the cycle is of the order of 26,000 years. The article inserts it expressly "to spare our readers astronomical errors" — that is, it warns its own students that the signs and the constellations have parted company.
Historical[R]ini:1.2:11:007
That the zodiac was "established by Ram, some twelve thousand years ago" is a Saint-Yves d'Alveydre claim — Ram as the primordial legislator of his Mission des Juifs — and not a historical statement. The figure has no evidential basis and is recorded as printed.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.2:11:024
The classification is standard and correctly given: Houses 1, 4, 7 and 10 angular; 2, 5, 8 and 11 succedent or fixed; 3, 6, 9 and 12 cadent. Nº 3 p. 9 builds the elemental triangles on the same frame.
Cross-estate[P-V]ini:1.2:21:002
This is the answer to the question that closed Nº 1. There, Ramana asked the departing travellers whether they would visit the temple at Madura; they said the opportunity had been lost; he replied "What a pity! Is it that you will not visit it?" Here the heading is "The Obligatory Visit to the Temple of Madura", and the narrative explains it: a traffic inspector at Virupullan, asked twice by two different people, put them on a train going the opposite way, no ticket inspector ever came, and they woke to find themselves at Madura, 800 kilometres from where they meant to be. The magazine lets the reader draw the conclusion. Read the last page of Nº 1 and this page together — the arc is deliberate and it spans two issues.
Comparative[I]ini:1.2:21:023
The narrative's own scruple is worth noting: the General Traffic Chief apologised and issued three tickets free, and the stationmaster and staff were astonished at the concession. The writer records the ordinary human explanation as carefully as the marvellous one, and never states which she believes.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.2:22:014
The etymology given is sound: Madurai does derive from madhu, sweetness or nectar, and the tradition that Siva poured nectar over the new city is the standard local account of the name. The writer's Tamil transcriptions elsewhere on this page are rougher, but this one holds.
Historical[S-V]ini:1.2:22:011
Megasthenes was indeed the Seleucid ambassador at the Mauryan court of Chandragupta around 302 BC, and the report of a Pandya realm ruled by a princess with revenues from 365 villages comes down through him, by way of the later Greek and Roman compilers. Ptolemy does list the Pandya capital. The article's classical scaffolding here is real, not ornamental.
Historical[S-V]ini:1.2:22:010
The Mahavamsa, the Pali chronicle of Ceylon, does connect the island's first king to a Pandya house of Madurai by marriage. Citing it beside Megasthenes and Ptolemy shows the writer working from a guidebook or gazetteer of some quality rather than from hearsay.
Historical[S-V]ini:1.2:23:014
The musical pillars are real: the Meenakshi temple at Madurai has clusters of slender colonnettes carved from single blocks of stone which ring at different pitches when struck. The writer's count of 22 rods and her tower heights are approximate — the southern gopuram is nearer 170 feet than 152 — but the phenomenon she describes is genuine and still shown to visitors.
Comparative[S-V]ini:1.2:23:017
The Tank of the Golden Lotuses is the Potramarai Kulam, and the tradition that no fish or frog lives in its water is the temple's own, told with the heron legend the writer gives. She reports it as something "curious to verify", which is the register she keeps throughout: marvels recorded, belief withheld.
Historical[R]ini:1.2:23:007
The story of the temple servant who threw himself from the East tower to have an unjust tax abolished, in the reign of Chokkanatha Nayak, is given without a source and the Press has not corroborated it. The Nayak dynasty of Madurai is historical; this episode is recorded as told.
Historical[P-V]ini:1.2:20:023
The column of astrological events is signed Leo de Mascheville, one of the few contributors the run names openly rather than by initiatic pseudonym, and a real figure in the South American Martinist organisation. His byline recurs across the volume.
Historical[P-V]ini:1.2:20:007
The events catalogued date the issue precisely: the German offensive in Russia, Japanese attacks in new zones of the East, and mutual threats of chemical warfare in the press. This is June 1942, and the magazine is reading the war through the aspects — the only place in Volume I where the world outside enters directly.
Comparative[C]ini:1.2:20:012
The argument from coincidence — that the number of matches is "too great not to draw powerfully the attention of the impartial reader" — is offered without any count, control or criterion for a miss. The events are selected after the fact and matched to aspects already known. The method is the weakness of the whole column, and it is worth naming, because the same writer elsewhere insists that readers verify rather than believe.
Historical[P-V]ini:1.2:20:018
Three dates are published in advance — 15, 20 and 25 May — with a promise to comment afterwards on what actually happened. Whatever one thinks of the practice, this is a falsifiable prediction offered to readers before the event, and it is the nearest the magazine comes to testing its own claims.
Comparative[P-V]ini:1.2:13:003
The eight limbs are given in a non-standard order. Patanjali's sequence is yama, niyama, asana, pranayama, pratyahara, dharana, dhyana, samadhi; the course puts asana first, before yama and niyama. That is deliberate — this is an Asana course, and the body is its entry point — but it inverts the ethical precedence the Yoga Sutras insist on, where restraint precedes posture.
Comparative[C]ini:1.2:16:019
The glossary ranks the yogas: hatha is "an inferior form", raja is "royal, superior". That hierarchy is Theosophical rather than Indian — it comes through Vivekananda and Blavatsky, who both disparaged hatha practice — and it sits oddly in a course whose whole subject is posture.
Historical[P-V]ini:1.2:16:002
The glossary promised in Nº 1 is delivered here in full, twenty-one entries with roman numerals keyed to the text. The transliterations are serviceable and the definitions are mostly accurate — kaivalya as isolation and unity, samadhi as ecstatic contemplation, pratyahara as withdrawal. The magazine is building its readers a working Sanskrit vocabulary, issue by issue.
Cross-estate[P-V]ini:1.2:16:022
The epigraph is taken from the "Ritual of the 2nd Degree" of the Martinist Order — one of the few places in the run where ritual text is quoted directly rather than commented upon — and it makes fraternity a consequence of understanding the human personality, not a sentiment added to it.