Fetching
One moment.
Eight numbers, from May to December 1942, printed in Montevideo by a body calling itself the Grupo Independiente de Estudios Esotéricos. The name is not incidental. Papus had founded a Groupe Indépendant d'Études Ésotériques in Paris in 1888 and given it a review called L'Initiation; Nº 6 of this magazine names him as its president and founder in so many words. What you are reading is a deliberate re-founding of that institution on the other side of the Atlantic, half a century later, with the same name and the same title over the door.
The first number sets out what the review means to be: the organ of an independent society of thought, open to criticism from its readers, "not a business either, nor anyone's means of livelihood", falling into "no particularism, and still less into any personalism". That claim is worth holding onto, because the volume keeps testing itself against it. A commentary on masonic ritual praises the symbols and then says plainly that the institution has forgotten what they mean. An article on Schopenhauer complains that philosophers and occultists each miss half of him. A poem on the second page rebukes the very piety the editorial has just described.
Four long series run through the volume and none of them finishes: Jehel's commentary on the masonic degrees, which reaches the raising of Hiram; Surya's astrology course, which builds one real chart for one real birth in Montevideo across six instalments; Asuri Kapila's course in the postures, with a Sanskrit glossary that reaches its seventy-third entry; and a treatise on the planetary hours that does conclude, in Nº 8, with Saturn and Jupiter. Threaded between them is something stranger — a Uruguayan woman signing herself Maya, who went to India, sat on the floor of Sri Ramana Maharshi's hall, and wrote it down. He asked her, as she left, whether she would visit the temple at Madura. She said the chance had gone. A railway official then sent her eight hundred kilometres in the wrong direction and she arrived at Madura. The magazine gives that sequence three issues and lets the reader draw the conclusion.
The volume closes in French, with Saint-Martin's "Le Cimetière d'Amboise" — begun in Nº 6, continued in Nº 7, still unfinished at the end of Nº 8.
On the apparatus. Every page of this volume carries commentary: 392 notes across 179 pages, marked by evidence tier, saying where a claim has been checked against a text the Press holds and where it has not. Quotations have been verified where verification was possible. Dante is misquoted here — nostri for vostri, which turns a rebuke of humanity into a shared observation. The "Prayer of Saint Francis" on p. 9 of Nº 4 is not by Francis; it first appears anonymously in 1912. Three arithmetical faults in the astrology course are identified, including one that does not affect its result and is marked as such. Where a contributor is right, that is recorded too, and he often is: the Gita is quoted accurately, the elemental triangles are correctly assigned, Montevideo's coordinates are right, and the mean daily motion of the Sun is given correct to the arcsecond.
On what is withheld. Five passages in this volume are not reproduced, amounting to 1,153 characters — about two hundredths of one per cent of the text. Each is marked where it stood, with the reason. The Press does not reproduce racial theory, racial-improvement doctrine, or period race-language used in pseudo-historical claims. Nothing is removed silently and nothing else has been altered; passages that merely use the vocabulary of 1942 while arguing against racial distinction — and there are several — stand as printed.
On the medical claims. The courses in this volume promise cures: of sterility, of gallstones, of arteriosclerosis, of spinal deformity. Nº 7 prints two clinical reports describing a man whose grey hair, baldness and wrinkles are said to have reversed over eleven years. These are reproduced because they are what the magazine said, and they are endorsed by nobody. Read them as evidence of what this readership was invited to believe.
1Anotemos bien los denominados Puntos Cardinales.
2Cuando el Sol está en el Meridiano y lo miráis, o por lo menos viráis el rostro hacia él, tenéis el Mediodía o Sur2 delante de vosotros; el Norte está atrás de vosotros, o más exactamente, debajo de vuestros pies, el Este a la izquierda y el Oeste a la derecha.
3Anotemos que tal posición es lo contrario de lo que se nota en los mapas geográficos, que son establecidos con el Norte visto de frente como pasa a Medianoche en el hemisferio Norte y a Mediodía en el Hemisferio Sur.
4Todos los astrólogos establecen el horóscopo con el Mediodía o Sur frente al observador.
5Es esencial recordar esta particularidad.
6Para guiarse sobre las carreteras terrestres, se han colocado marcos con cifras indicando las distancias kilométricas.
7¿Cómo podemos guiarnos en el espacio celeste?
8En forma muy sencilla.
9Se ha dividido la bóveda celeste en fajas llamadas grados.
10La mitad de la bóveda celeste, visible, comprende 6 zonas de 30 grados cada una, lo que nos da 180º para la mitad visible y 180º para la otra mitad.
11Esto completa 360º para la esfera entera.
12Los diversos astros van recorriendo esa carretera celeste con velocidades diferentes.
13Es como sobre la Tierra, donde el auto y la carreta del paisano, saliendo al mismo tiempo de un pueblo no pasan al mismo tiempo delante del primer marco kilométrico, ya que el auto anda mucho más ligero que la carreta.
14En forma idéntica, en el cielo, hay astros más rápidos y otros más lentos.
15Así, la Tierra da una vuelta completa al cielo en 24 horas, girando sobre sí misma.
16Como hay 12 divisiones de 30 grados cada una, la Tierra recorre, pues, UNA división cada DOS HORAS.
17En cambio, conforme la apariencia visible, el Sol recorre cada división en un mes y se precisa, pues un año para que el Sol haya dado la vuelta a los 360º del cielo.
18El lector ya sabe, es claro, que es la Tierra la que gira alrededor del Sol en un año; pero conservamos el lenguaje de las apariencias, útil para la comprensión de la Astrología.
19Estudiad con atención la figura que daremos más adelante, que indica las divisiones astronómicas del cielo.
20Cada una de las divisiones de 30 grados constituye lo que los astrólogos llaman una Casa.
21El cielo está dividido por los astrólogos en doce Casas, en las cuales están alojados los Signos del Zodíaco, a razón de uno por cada Casa y los Planetas.
22La división de las Casas astrológicas está establecida conforme la marcha del Sol, es decir, que cada Casa de 30 grados representa un mes del año.
23El año de los astrólogos empieza en marzo son el Signo de Aries (Carnero) – de 20 de Marzo a 20 de Abril – y allí esta la casa número uno; después viene la segunda con el Signo del Toro, y así sucesivamente conforme a la figura.
24Para claridad de este estudio elemental, suponemos que las Casas y los Signos coinciden exactamente, lo que realmente pasa sólo para las personas nacidas en el primer grado de Aries o Carnero.
25Hemos conservado esta confusión entre Casas y Signos para facilitar el estudio de los elementos estáticos de la Astrología.
26Más adelante, haremos las observaciones útiles para explicar como la primera casa cambia de signo conforme la fecha 2 Véase nota 1 en pie de página anterior.
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
1Let us note carefully the so-called Cardinal Points.
2When the Sun is on the Meridian and you look at it, or at least turn your face towards it, you have the Midday or South[2] in front of you; the North is behind you, or more exactly beneath your feet, the East on the left and the West on the right.
3Let us note that such a position is the contrary of what is seen on geographical maps, which are established with the North seen from the front, as happens at Midnight in the Northern hemisphere and at Midday in the Southern Hemisphere.
4All astrologers establish the horoscope with the Midday or South facing the observer.
5It is essential to remember this particularity.
6To guide oneself upon the roads of the earth, markers have been placed with figures indicating the distances in kilometres.
7How can we guide ourselves in celestial space?
8In a very simple way.
9The celestial vault has been divided into bands called degrees.
10The visible half of the celestial vault comprises 6 zones of 30 degrees each, which gives us 180º for the visible half and 180º for the other half.
11This completes 360º for the entire sphere.
12The various heavenly bodies travel along that celestial road at different speeds.
13It is as upon the Earth, where the motor-car and the countryman's cart, setting out at the same time from a village, do not pass at the same time before the first kilometre marker, since the car goes much faster than the cart.
14In identical fashion, in the sky there are swifter bodies and slower ones.
15Thus the Earth makes a complete turn of the sky in 24 hours, revolving upon itself.
16As there are 12 divisions of 30 degrees each, the Earth therefore traverses ONE division every TWO HOURS.
17By contrast, according to visible appearance, the Sun traverses each division in a month, and a year is therefore needed for the Sun to have gone round the 360º of the sky.
18The reader already knows, of course, that it is the Earth which turns around the Sun in a year; but we keep the language of appearances, useful for the understanding of Astrology.
19Study attentively the figure we shall give further on, which indicates the astronomical divisions of the sky.
20Each of the divisions of 30 degrees constitutes what astrologers call a House.
21The sky is divided by astrologers into twelve Houses, in which are lodged the Signs of the Zodiac, at the rate of one to each House, and the Planets.
22The division of the astrological Houses is established according to the march of the Sun, that is to say, each House of 30 degrees represents a month of the year.
23The astrologers' year begins in March with the Sign of Aries (the Ram) — from 20 March to 20 April — and there is house number one; then comes the second with the Sign of the Bull, and so on according to the figure.
24For the clarity of this elementary study we suppose that the Houses and the Signs coincide exactly, which really happens only for persons born in the first degree of Aries or the Ram.
25We have kept this confusion between Houses and Signs in order to facilitate the study of the static elements of Astrology.
26Further on we shall make the observations useful for explaining how the first house changes sign according to the date [2] See note 1 at the foot of the preceding page.
Our translation, period-faithful. Citable as our translation, never as the source.
Ramana Maharshi (1879–1950) was living at Arunachala when these accounts were written, and would remain there until his death eight years later. The article is therefore reportage on a living teacher, not hagiography of a historical one — which is unusual for this corpus, most of whose subjects are long dead.
The question "Who am I?" — ātma-vichāra — is Ramana's central method, and it is reported here accurately and without embellishment. Set beside the elaborate technical apparatus of the astrology and asana courses in the same issue, its bareness is conspicuous: the periodical prints both without remarking on the contrast.
Patanjali is quoted as "Yoga is the prevention of chitta from taking diverse forms — vrittis", which renders Yoga Sūtra I.2, yogaś citta-vṛtti-nirodhaḥ. The rendering is competent. The same definition is repeated in Nº 3's asana course, indicating a shared source among the contributors rather than independent translation.
Edwin Babbitt (1828–1905), author of The Principles of Light and Colour (1878), the founding text of chromotherapy. Bernardi is not inventing a system but transmitting an American one already sixty years old, and presents it as science catching up with esoteric doctrine rather than the reverse.
Colour projected into the aura of a subject who may be "present or at a variable distance", every projection closing on snow white. This is the operator-directed use of colour that the Press's crosswalk sets against the twelve-colour sequence, where colour arises unbidden on a white ground and is not chosen at all. The shared ground is white; the divergence is who chooses.
→ chromotherapy-method
Leo de Mascheville scoring, in print, the Saturn–Uranus forecast he published in Nº 1 one month earlier. Whatever the merits of the scoring — the events cited are broadly drawn and the criteria are set after the fact — the practice of publishing a dated prediction and then returning to it publicly is the review's own, and can be checked against the full run.
Kundalini described as a power "which electricity and magnetism are no more than manifestations of". The identification of subtle force with the newly-understood physical forces is characteristic of occultism after the 1890s; it recurs in this corpus wherever a traditional term needs a modern warrant.
Ramana's response to being stoned by boys — caressing them on coming out of meditation — is the kind of detail that survives translation between hagiographic traditions unchanged. The same episode is told in the Ashram's own literature; the review is transmitting an established account, not reporting a fresh one.
Ramana's mother Alagammal remaining at the ashram as her son's disciple rather than reclaiming him is historically attested; she died there in 1922 and her shrine became the Matrubhuteswara temple. The review's telling — that the Divine Light proved stronger than a mother's love — is the tradition's own reading of the fact.
The Temple of the Apprentice is described in full: the black-and-white floor, red walls, blue vault, the cord of 81 knots, the two columns. This is the masonic material the Martinist commentary builds on, and it is set out here in enough detail that the later degrees can be followed without outside reference.
Three sentences of Louis-Claude de Saint-Martin quoted as epigraph — on the triangle, on material fact bearing intellectual truth, and on the revivification of the will as the chief task of guilty beings. Saint-Martin's Des erreurs et de la vérité and Tableau naturel are both now held, so these epigraphs can be traced to their context rather than left as detached aphorisms.
→ thread:stmartin_erreurs_verite
Surya's course proceeds by transcribing Papus at length — “PAPUS continues” — rather than by exposition. The course is therefore a translation project as much as a teaching one, and its fidelity can be measured once the Traité Méthodique named in Nº 4 is held.
→ thread:traite_science_occulte_papus
The four paths — Karma, Bhakti, Raja and Jnana — are declared complementary rather than antagonistic, each assigned a function: Karma removes evil, Bhakti destroys hatred, Raja concentrates the mind, Jnana removes ignorance. The scheme is Vivekananda's, and had been circulating in the West for fifty years by 1942.
A poem signed Martha S.M. — one of the few women's bylines in the run outside Maya, and the only literary rather than doctrinal one in the early issues. Recorded because the roster of contributors is thin on attributable women and each instance matters to it.
The course states its own simplification — Houses and Signs are treated as coinciding, which is true only for a birth in the first degree of Aries — and promises to correct it later. It does: Nº 6 and Nº 7 work a real chart where the cusps fall mid-sign, and Nº 8 places the planets accordingly.
The Dante is misquoted, and the change matters. The magazine prints "Lo cielo i nostri movimenti inizia" — heaven initiates our movements. Dante wrote vostri, your movements: the speaker is Marco Lombardo, a soul in Purgatory rebuking the living for blaming the stars for their own faults. The Press's held Divine Comedy has it at Purgatory XVI, p. 193 — "The sky begins your movements… For good and evil, light is granted ye." Changing your to our turns a rebuke aimed at humanity into a statement the writer shares, which is precisely the opposite of the passage's point about responsibility. The Italian is corrupt elsewhere too ("ch´lo" for "ch'i' 'l"), so this may be a compositor rather than the contributor.
The reference is exact: Purgatorio XVI, line 73 and following. The magazine cites its sources by canto and line more carefully than most of its contemporaries, which makes checking possible — and, here, makes the misquotation visible.
Jehel's three-step aphorism is the compressed form of the doctrine the whole run teaches: he who thinks daily more of others than himself does not yet know where the Way lies; he who thinks much of others has found the Way; he who never thinks of himself is the Way. The progression from finding to being is the point, and it recurs at Nº 8 p. 3 as the equilibrium of the Initiate.
Sun and Moon as emanated and reflected light, flanking the Orient wall, are read as the Law of Polarisation "at its own sources". The article consistently treats masonic furniture as a diagram of forces rather than as decoration — its governing method throughout.
The three alternatives painted on the luminous triangle — the letter G, the Tetragrammaton, or the single Iod — are said to signify the same thing seen at different heights. The Iod is then linked to INRI and to the name of Jesus. That the same quaternary Name is expounded again in Nº 8 p. 2, as the four Orders of Knowledge, shows how central it is to the magazine's scheme.
Calling Iod an "Aramaic letter" and assigning it to "the Hebrew and Egyptian initiations, as in those of ancient India" flattens three distinct traditions into one lineage. The claim is the article's, not the evidence's, and is characteristic of the period's comparative method.
Jakin and Boaz are correctly placed and correctly assigned — J to force and the positive pole, B to beauty and form — and the transliteration "BOHAZ" is a variant rather than an error. The pillars are those of 1 Kings 7:21, and the masonic reading of them as a polarity is standard.
The observation is genuinely acute: Masonry names the third pillar not Matter or Form but Beauty, so that the initiate cannot conceive realisation apart from harmony. The article draws a moral consequence out of a choice of vocabulary, which is its best mode.
The point is made plainly and is accurate: the volume on the altar "ought to be" all the sacred scriptures of humanity, but modern Masonry "for special reasons" uses only the Bible, opened at the Gospel of John. The gap between what the symbol requires and what the practice delivers is the article's standing complaint.
The convention is correctly explained: the astrological chart is drawn facing the noon Sun, so South is at the top — the reverse of a geographical map, which is drawn as though facing North. Beginners confuse the two constantly, and the article stops to say so.
The arithmetic is right: twelve divisions of thirty degrees, a complete rotation in twenty-four hours, therefore one division every two hours. The course is careful with its numbers throughout Volume I, and the Wheel of Fortune calculation in Nº 8 checks out digit by digit.
A candid sentence, and worth marking: "The reader already knows, of course, that it is the Earth which turns around the Sun… but we keep the language of appearances, useful for the understanding of Astrology." The geocentric frame is declared a convenience, not a cosmology — the same declaration made in Nº 1 p. 12.
The precession point is substantially right and unusually honest for an astrology course: because of precession the Sun no longer enters the constellation Aries at the equinox but around the middle of April, and the cycle is of the order of 26,000 years. The article inserts it expressly "to spare our readers astronomical errors" — that is, it warns its own students that the signs and the constellations have parted company.
That the zodiac was "established by Ram, some twelve thousand years ago" is a Saint-Yves d'Alveydre claim — Ram as the primordial legislator of his Mission des Juifs — and not a historical statement. The figure has no evidential basis and is recorded as printed.
The classification is standard and correctly given: Houses 1, 4, 7 and 10 angular; 2, 5, 8 and 11 succedent or fixed; 3, 6, 9 and 12 cadent. Nº 3 p. 9 builds the elemental triangles on the same frame.
This is the answer to the question that closed Nº 1. There, Ramana asked the departing travellers whether they would visit the temple at Madura; they said the opportunity had been lost; he replied "What a pity! Is it that you will not visit it?" Here the heading is "The Obligatory Visit to the Temple of Madura", and the narrative explains it: a traffic inspector at Virupullan, asked twice by two different people, put them on a train going the opposite way, no ticket inspector ever came, and they woke to find themselves at Madura, 800 kilometres from where they meant to be. The magazine lets the reader draw the conclusion. Read the last page of Nº 1 and this page together — the arc is deliberate and it spans two issues.
The narrative's own scruple is worth noting: the General Traffic Chief apologised and issued three tickets free, and the stationmaster and staff were astonished at the concession. The writer records the ordinary human explanation as carefully as the marvellous one, and never states which she believes.
The etymology given is sound: Madurai does derive from madhu, sweetness or nectar, and the tradition that Siva poured nectar over the new city is the standard local account of the name. The writer's Tamil transcriptions elsewhere on this page are rougher, but this one holds.
Megasthenes was indeed the Seleucid ambassador at the Mauryan court of Chandragupta around 302 BC, and the report of a Pandya realm ruled by a princess with revenues from 365 villages comes down through him, by way of the later Greek and Roman compilers. Ptolemy does list the Pandya capital. The article's classical scaffolding here is real, not ornamental.
The Mahavamsa, the Pali chronicle of Ceylon, does connect the island's first king to a Pandya house of Madurai by marriage. Citing it beside Megasthenes and Ptolemy shows the writer working from a guidebook or gazetteer of some quality rather than from hearsay.
The musical pillars are real: the Meenakshi temple at Madurai has clusters of slender colonnettes carved from single blocks of stone which ring at different pitches when struck. The writer's count of 22 rods and her tower heights are approximate — the southern gopuram is nearer 170 feet than 152 — but the phenomenon she describes is genuine and still shown to visitors.
The Tank of the Golden Lotuses is the Potramarai Kulam, and the tradition that no fish or frog lives in its water is the temple's own, told with the heron legend the writer gives. She reports it as something "curious to verify", which is the register she keeps throughout: marvels recorded, belief withheld.
The story of the temple servant who threw himself from the East tower to have an unjust tax abolished, in the reign of Chokkanatha Nayak, is given without a source and the Press has not corroborated it. The Nayak dynasty of Madurai is historical; this episode is recorded as told.
The column of astrological events is signed Leo de Mascheville, one of the few contributors the run names openly rather than by initiatic pseudonym, and a real figure in the South American Martinist organisation. His byline recurs across the volume.
The events catalogued date the issue precisely: the German offensive in Russia, Japanese attacks in new zones of the East, and mutual threats of chemical warfare in the press. This is June 1942, and the magazine is reading the war through the aspects — the only place in Volume I where the world outside enters directly.
The argument from coincidence — that the number of matches is "too great not to draw powerfully the attention of the impartial reader" — is offered without any count, control or criterion for a miss. The events are selected after the fact and matched to aspects already known. The method is the weakness of the whole column, and it is worth naming, because the same writer elsewhere insists that readers verify rather than believe.
Three dates are published in advance — 15, 20 and 25 May — with a promise to comment afterwards on what actually happened. Whatever one thinks of the practice, this is a falsifiable prediction offered to readers before the event, and it is the nearest the magazine comes to testing its own claims.
The eight limbs are given in a non-standard order. Patanjali's sequence is yama, niyama, asana, pranayama, pratyahara, dharana, dhyana, samadhi; the course puts asana first, before yama and niyama. That is deliberate — this is an Asana course, and the body is its entry point — but it inverts the ethical precedence the Yoga Sutras insist on, where restraint precedes posture.
The glossary ranks the yogas: hatha is "an inferior form", raja is "royal, superior". That hierarchy is Theosophical rather than Indian — it comes through Vivekananda and Blavatsky, who both disparaged hatha practice — and it sits oddly in a course whose whole subject is posture.
The glossary promised in Nº 1 is delivered here in full, twenty-one entries with roman numerals keyed to the text. The transliterations are serviceable and the definitions are mostly accurate — kaivalya as isolation and unity, samadhi as ecstatic contemplation, pratyahara as withdrawal. The magazine is building its readers a working Sanskrit vocabulary, issue by issue.
The epigraph is taken from the "Ritual of the 2nd Degree" of the Martinist Order — one of the few places in the run where ritual text is quoted directly rather than commented upon — and it makes fraternity a consequence of understanding the human personality, not a sentiment added to it.