1THE DEMIURGE (Continuation and end) By Palingenius IV After having characterised the three Worlds and the states of the being corresponding to them, and having indicated, so far as was possible, what the being liberated from the demiurgic dominion is, we must return once more to the question of the distinction between Good and Evil, to draw some consequences from the preceding exposition.
2First of all, we might be tempted to say this: if the distinction between Good and Evil is completely illusory, if it does not in reality exist, it must be the same with morality, for it is quite evident that morality is founded upon this distinction, which it essentially presupposes.
3That would be going too far; morality exists, but in the same measure as the distinction between Good and Evil — that is, for all that belongs to the domain of the Demiurge; from the universal point of view it would no longer have any reason for being.
4In effect, it can be applied only to action; now, action presupposes change, which is possible only in the formal or manifested; the World without form is immutable, superior to change and, consequently, to action, and that is why the being that belongs no more to the Empire of the Demiurge is without action.
5This shows that great care must be taken never to confuse the diverse planes of the Universe, because what is said of one might not be true of the other.
6Thus morality necessarily exists on the social plane, which is essentially the domain of action; but it can exist no longer when one considers the metaphysical or universal plane, because then there is no more action.
7This established, we must point out that the being who is superior to action possesses, nevertheless, the plenitude of activity; but it is a potential activity, an activity, then, that does not act.
8This being is, not immobile, as might unreasonably be said, but immutable, that is, superior to change.
9In effect, he is identified with Being, which is always identical to itself, according to the biblical formula: “Being is Being”.
10This should be set beside the Taoist doctrine, according to which the Activity of Heaven is non-acting; the Sage, in whom the Activity of Heaven is reflected, observes non-action.
11Nevertheless, this Sage, whom we have designated as the Pneumatic or the Yogi, can have the appearances of action, as the Moon has the appearances of movement when the clouds pass before her; but the wind that drives the clouds has no influence upon the Moon.
12In the same way, the agitation of the demiurgic World has no influence upon the Pneumatic.
13In this connection we can once more cite what Sankaratcharya said: “The Yogi, having crossed the sea of the passions, is united with Tranquillity and rejoices in the Spirit.
14“Having renounced those pleasures that are born of external perishable objects, and enjoying spiritual delights, he is calm and serene as the candle beneath the extinguisher, and rejoices in his own essence.
15“During his residence in the body he is not affected by its properties, as the firmament is not affected by what floats in its bosom; knowing all things, he remains unaffected by contingencies”.
16We can now understand the true meaning of the word Nirvana, of which so many false interpretations have been given; this word signifies literally extinction of the breath or of agitation — the state, then, of a being that is subject to no agitation,
Our translation, period-faithful. Citable as our translation, never as the source.