Photographed original wrapper again: pages 1, 2, 24 and 25 are the 1943 printing itself — same radiant-sun cover, same masthead and prospectus as Nº 13, on the warm original paper. Transcribed by hand from the render.
→ ini:2.13
Fetching
One moment.
La Iniciación: Mensuario del Grupo Independiente de Estudios Esotéricos
The Initiation: Monthly of the Independent Group of Esoteric Studies
La Iniciación · Año II, Nº 14 · June 1943
Gate passedSeeker and aboveModern transcription — not a facsimileOperator ruling: no copyright implications asserted for this work. Uruguay life+50 (Leo d. 1970 → PD 2020); US URAA restoration assessed at ~2041 in the collection plan and overridden by the operator.1 passage withheld
primary
derivedpage 19
1psychologists: Subconsciousness, Unconsciousness, Infraconsciousness — and also the Subconscient or the Unconscient (Jung, Freud, Ribot, Claparède, Roustan, James, Binet, etc., etc.).
2We shall see further on that this classification into two particular regions leaves many interesting phenomena in darkness.
3For the moment we shall continue with the subject before us, availing ourselves of a new example.
4On my work-table rest four objects: the paper on which I am writing, a pencil, an eraser and a medal.
5I look at them an instant, then close my eyes.
6I then try to represent them to myself in imagination and indeed, though somewhat confused, I see them again, occupying their relative positions on the rectangle of wood that supports them.
7It seems reasonable that this reproduction of objects — a kind of photographic plates which psychologists call images — must be seated somewhere; and where, if not in consciousness?...
8But not only can I represent to myself the objects enumerated; I can also represent to myself a pain, physical or moral, the acid taste of a lemon or the gentle scent of violets.
9In all these cases I say that I have consciousness of the phenomena passing in my being, by virtue of which I acquire the knowledge of my existence together with that of my personality.
10Some authors — Balmes, for example — establish a marked difference between psychological consciousness and moral conscience.
11This difference, though little used in our days, is fully justified by direct experience.
12It is common to speak of a conscience of good and evil (though no one knows with certainty what good is, nor what evil is), regarding it as an incorruptible judge legislating over our actions and feelings.
13Psychological consciousness, on the other hand, intervenes only in the relations of the I and the NOT-I — that is, between the subject that knows and the object that is known.
14The Field of Consciousness — Images, emotions, perceptions, ideas and, in general, all those phenomena which may be classified as psychological, are contained in what is known by the name of the Field of Consciousness.
15The idea is very graphic, but has the inconvenience of creating in the mind of the curious a two-dimensional image of something which necessarily cannot be inscribed in any known system of coordinates.
16But since every truth possesses its opposite (which is equally true when the position of the one who judges is changed or inverted), it is evident that the image has the virtue of serving as a reference for the concept.
17Contents of Consciousness — The sum of the representations sustained by the "field" is called the contents of consciousness; this expression follows from the one contained in the paragraph above.
18The value of this sum is variable for each instant of waking activity, different for each subject, and proportional to apperceptive and discriminative capacity.
19The laboratories of experimental psychology have spent veritable fortunes to establish an average index capable of enclosing in a general law the quantity of images upon which the attention of a given subject can bear.
20The results have been almost nil.
21Which was to be expected, for it is likewise impossible to find two subjects who can fill in a "test" in the same way, in the same time, and with identical qualitative and numerical value.
22· 19
Our translation, period-faithful. Citable as our translation, never as the source.
The contributor roster is unchanged from Nº 13 — and this number activates two of its quieter names: Wronsky writes the psychology essay at p. 18, and a new voice, Annie, A∴M∴, closes the number in verse. The masthead is not a list of honorifics; it is the cast, and the run works through it.
The SUMARIO credits the Hebrew-alphabet course to Jehel where Nº 13 ran the same series under Sévaka — and the body at p. 7 keeps Jehel. Either the course changed hands mid-series or the credit drifted; the run itself never says. Both attributions preserved as printed.
Vayusattva enters the biography: the Oriental Master of the astral contacts of 1895–1900 now appears with a name and a command — \"the war will come; they will call you, but you will not go\". The 1914 exemption at the Consulate (a knee injury) is offered as the prophecy's fulfilment. Family tradition, reported as such.
The origin of the Book of the Laws of Vayú, in the run's own words: written 1914–1919 under Vayusattva's near-daily direction, with the Law of Astrogenesis keyed to the birth of Cedaior's second son. The English version made with the late Rose L. de Robinson is the ancestor of the translation this house holds. The \"Expectant Church\" of 17 August 1919 — failed as an organisation, seed retained — is dated here and nowhere else in the run so far.
The sixth-Subrace frame, kept with its context: the run dates the Subrace's birth \"potentially and cosmically\" to 13 February 1916 on Vayusattva's teaching. This is Theosophical root-race vocabulary — a doctrine of racial-evolutionary epochs the Press does not endorse — used here as the run's own eschatological self-description: the \"gospel\" audience of the Laws of Vayú. Kept as self-cosmology under the operator's ruling of 2026-08-24; the adjacent racial evidence-claim about living peoples is withheld, and the note at 6:006 says so in place.
Vía-Monte de los Olivos, key 666: the kabbalistic reading of a street address — Viamonte, Olivos — as Way-Mount of Olives with the Apocalypse number, is the run's habit of finding the doctrine in the furniture of life. The same habit produced the AMEN/AUM folios and the EGIDE cross.
\"Les Veilleurs\" verifies in outline: a French movement of that name existed around 1920 (Schwaller de Lubicz's circle), and Gaston Revel was a real theosophical editor. \"Henri Denil / Commandant Denil\" and the book \"Progrès et Ordre\" have not been located; the synarchy frame is Saint-Yves' legacy. Reported with one verified anchor and one unverified name.
The \"Olympic Colony of the sixth sub-race\": the failed Andean settlement is named in the doctrine's own vocabulary — see the note at 5:005 for the frame and the Press's position. What the anecdote actually records is the run's recurring complaint: the \"city idealists\" who admire the doctrine and will not move for it, while the Master crosses Patagonia on horseback playing his violin for bread.
Fabre d'Olivet on VAU, quoted at length — La Langue hébraïque restituée is the spine under this whole alphabet course, as Saint-Yves (quoted around it) is its amplifier; both are named openly here. The course's habit of printing the Hebrew letter beside each name survives in the retype and in both panes of this reader.
The closing word-analyses — AmaR, RuaJ, ADAM as \"universal intelligent man\" — are Fabre d'Olivet's method applied in miniature: every word a compound ideogram. García Blanco, cited for IOD, was a real nineteenth-century Spanish Hebraist (Antonio María García Blanco), the course's one academic authority.
The \"Lord of — in\" column continues the worked example across its fifth number: the same Capricorn-ascendant chart of Nº 8, read through the rulers table of Nº 13. The course now spans ini:1.8 → 2.12 → 2.13 → 2.14 as one continuous calculation, each number citing the earlier by page.
→ ini:1.8
10 August 1942 was indeed a Monday — the example chart's Lord of the Day claim checks against the calendar, and the planetary-hours computation (15:30 civil → Jupiter's hour) is consistent with the method taught in Nº 4. The course's arithmetic continues to verify.
Practice instruction, reproduced as printed and not endorsed: Padangusthasana with perineal heel-placement, breath retention and OM. Figure 11 is announced in the text; no plate for it survives in our witness of this number — the eleventh asana figure is a gap the facsimile hunt should watch for.
Ojas Sakti — the claim that conserved sexual energy transmutes into nervous-spiritual force stored \"in the brain itself\" is the standard hatha-yoga doctrine of ojas as the theosophical generation transmitted it; the course's medical framing (spermatorrhoea, tonicity) is its period dress. See the caveat standard: preserved as taught, not health guidance.
The Suddha Dharma Mandalam experiment, with numbers: 103 persons received the first exercise from 18 January 1943; 65 inactive, 38 active, 14 already using mantrams. The run publishes its own retention funnel — the most concrete picture anywhere in the corpus of the school's actual scale. Note the address: Casilla 377, where the masthead and Kapila use 317 — either a second box or a misprint, preserved as printed.
→ ini:3.29
The Vaisakh Full Moon of 1943: 19 May at 21:12 Greenwich is astronomically correct for that full moon, and Vaisakha Purnima is indeed the great festival the Suddha Dharma shares with the Buddhist world. \"The Mother (Y. D.)\" is Yoga Devi of the Suddha literature; Subrahmaniem is the Mandalam's master-name from the S.D.M. line of Sir Subramania Iyer. The Sanskrit verse and its printed translation are kept as set.
\"Black light\" for infrared, propagating in \"the ether\" at 300,000 km/s — the physics is period-correct in its numbers and period-bound in its frame. Wronsky's stove, the threshold of perception, and the motor-car of p. 20 are the essay's empirical style: consciousness taught from household apparatus.
The psychologists' roster — Jung, Freud, Ribot, Claparède, Roustan, James, Binet — and Balmes on conscience are all real and current for 1943; the essay knows the experimental literature it is quarrelling with (\"the laboratories have spent fortunes… results almost nil\"). Transcendent Psychology positions itself against a psychology it has actually read.
The Centenarian is real Balzac juvenilia — Le Centenaire (1822, signed Horace de Saint-Aubin), the Melmoth-flavoured novel of the deathless Beringheld; La Dernière Fée likewise. Gastaldi's point — the occult vocation visible before the Comédie — stands on genuine early works, whatever weight one gives the garret anecdote of the Bible and Tacitus.
Balzac on Wronski, in the very number where \"Wronsky\" writes: the 1 August 1834 letter to Mme Hanska (printed \"Hamska\") calls Hoene-Wroński \"great mathematician, great mystic… the strongest head in Europe\". The run's psychology essayist signs with this Pole's name eighteen pages earlier. The letter is genuine Balzac correspondence; the juxtaposition is the run winking at its own masthead.
→ ini:2.14:18:001
Maurice Privat (1889–1949) — the French astrologer and radio pioneer — writing from Monaco in 1938: \"Balzac is my god… it was through Henry de Latouche that he was initiated into Martinism.\" An independent witness for the Latouche initiation that Nº 12's Chaboseau chain asserted — arriving by a different channel, two numbers later. Corroboration among believers is not proof, but the tradition is now attested from France and from the Río de la Plata separately.
→ ini:2.12:17:005
The AMORC letter (San José, 14 May 1940): the claim that Balzac \"helped revise part of the ritual\" for the Martinists of his epoch is the Rosicrucian Order's own tradition, stated by its correspondence department without evidence offered. Reported as received; nothing in the documented record supports a ritual-revising Balzac.
Gastaldi's Confraternité Universelle Balzacienne and the Balzacian Museum at Colón, Montevideo — the editors' note fixes the movement in the city's geography, claims 2,000 members, and places his book with Editora Guaira of Curitiba. The run's Balzac obsession now has an institutional address three numbers of evidence deep.
A new voice closes the number: Annie, A∴M∴ — the poem's final line addresses \"my Sister\", the run's first verse written woman-to-woman. With Martha, Lorelair, Maya and Leona Constantia on the masthead, the feminine college of the GIDEE now has a poet; compare the Hidden Mothers shelf-work for the wider pattern.
The prospectus plate repeats Nº 13's — same curriculum, same faculty — confirming the school ran these courses continuously; the folio alone differs. The advertisement plate at p. 25 likewise repeats, with Mascheville and Della Rosa's language lessons and Bucheli's almanac unchanged.
→ ini:2.13:25:003
Wrapper advertisement plate, identical to Nº 13 p. 26 including the Dornaleche imprint — the printer's line dating the physical originals of both numbers to the same shop on Cerro Largo.
The seventeen-letter proposition assembled: the course's central artifact — the alphabet read as one continuous sentence from ALEF to PE — is completed here, before the five \"initiatic\" letters close it at p. 9. Compare the compact version Sévaka printed in Nº 13 at 10:003: same doctrine, there as a table, here as argued prose.
→ ini:2.13:10:003
Lord of the Figure — the almuten of traditional astrology under a French name: the strongest planet in an angular house outranking the nominal Ruler is the classical doctrine of the dominus geniturae, and the tie-break preference for the luminaries follows the tradition exactly. The course keeps translating the seventeenth-century apparatus into its own plain rules.
Service as the operative test: of the diary observations, the third is the school's doctrine in one line — results follow the motive \"to SERVE\", with a conceded \"automatism\" on the physical plane for everyone else. This is the criterion the praxis crosswalk should carry for every Suddha exercise: the same practice, two outcomes, split by intention.
The starter-motor as a metaphysics lesson: a full page of carburettor and bendix so that one question can land — the gauges' data are apprehended by the mind but are not the mind. Wronsky's essay teaches the I/NOT-I distinction from an owner's manual: the run's empirical didactic style at its most extreme.
QA gate report
- PASS G1 coverage 296/296
- PASS G11 alignment 263/263
- PASS G0 source kind 1/1
- PASS G6 page anchoring 296/296
- PASS G3 bracket legality 296/296
- PASS G10 numeric fidelity 296/296
- PASS G2 no unanchored English 296/296
- PASS G4 no pipeline scaffolding 296/296