Jehel's third article on Papus, running from Nº 6. With this number Volume I closes: eight issues, May to December 1942.
Fetching
One moment.
Fetching
One moment.
Eight numbers, from May to December 1942, printed in Montevideo by a body calling itself the Grupo Independiente de Estudios Esotéricos. The name is not incidental. Papus had founded a Groupe Indépendant d'Études Ésotériques in Paris in 1888 and given it a review called L'Initiation; Nº 6 of this magazine names him as its president and founder in so many words. What you are reading is a deliberate re-founding of that institution on the other side of the Atlantic, half a century later, with the same name and the same title over the door.
The first number sets out what the review means to be: the organ of an independent society of thought, open to criticism from its readers, "not a business either, nor anyone's means of livelihood", falling into "no particularism, and still less into any personalism". That claim is worth holding onto, because the volume keeps testing itself against it. A commentary on masonic ritual praises the symbols and then says plainly that the institution has forgotten what they mean. An article on Schopenhauer complains that philosophers and occultists each miss half of him. A poem on the second page rebukes the very piety the editorial has just described.
Four long series run through the volume and none of them finishes: Jehel's commentary on the masonic degrees, which reaches the raising of Hiram; Surya's astrology course, which builds one real chart for one real birth in Montevideo across six instalments; Asuri Kapila's course in the postures, with a Sanskrit glossary that reaches its seventy-third entry; and a treatise on the planetary hours that does conclude, in Nº 8, with Saturn and Jupiter. Threaded between them is something stranger — a Uruguayan woman signing herself Maya, who went to India, sat on the floor of Sri Ramana Maharshi's hall, and wrote it down. He asked her, as she left, whether she would visit the temple at Madura. She said the chance had gone. A railway official then sent her eight hundred kilometres in the wrong direction and she arrived at Madura. The magazine gives that sequence three issues and lets the reader draw the conclusion.
The volume closes in French, with Saint-Martin's "Le Cimetière d'Amboise" — begun in Nº 6, continued in Nº 7, still unfinished at the end of Nº 8.
On the apparatus. Every page of this volume carries commentary: 392 notes across 179 pages, marked by evidence tier, saying where a claim has been checked against a text the Press holds and where it has not. Quotations have been verified where verification was possible. Dante is misquoted here — nostri for vostri, which turns a rebuke of humanity into a shared observation. The "Prayer of Saint Francis" on p. 9 of Nº 4 is not by Francis; it first appears anonymously in 1912. Three arithmetical faults in the astrology course are identified, including one that does not affect its result and is marked as such. Where a contributor is right, that is recorded too, and he often is: the Gita is quoted accurately, the elemental triangles are correctly assigned, Montevideo's coordinates are right, and the mean daily motion of the Sun is given correct to the arcsecond.
On what is withheld. Five passages in this volume are not reproduced, amounting to 1,153 characters — about two hundredths of one per cent of the text. Each is marked where it stood, with the reason. The Press does not reproduce racial theory, racial-improvement doctrine, or period race-language used in pseudo-historical claims. Nothing is removed silently and nothing else has been altered; passages that merely use the vocabulary of 1942 while arguing against racial distinction — and there are several — stand as printed.
On the medical claims. The courses in this volume promise cures: of sterility, of gallstones, of arteriosclerosis, of spinal deformity. Nº 7 prints two clinical reports describing a man whose grey hair, baldness and wrinkles are said to have reversed over eleven years. These are reproduced because they are what the magazine said, and they are endorsed by nobody. Read them as evidence of what this readership was invited to believe.
1Evidentemente hay quienes participan de las características de ambos grupos a la vez.
2Los primeros son los que traen los gérmenes de nuevas concepciones, las grandes ideas abstractas; los segundos desarrollan las ideas particulares ya existentes, llevándolas en forma constructiva a planos cada vez más concretos, perfeccionando sus detalles.
3Los unos fecunda, los otros construyen.
4Los grandes iniciados de la antigüedad, así como algunos místicos y pensadores modernos pertenecen al primer grupo mencionado y sus ideas son pocas veces comprendidas y reconocidas; en cambio, los sabios modernos, en su mayoría, pertenecen al segundo grupo, pues en los últimos siglos prevalece, en la ciencia, la diferenciación del conocimiento; por eso, cuando de vez en cuando aparecen pensadores que tratan de remontar la ciencia a su origen verdadero y místico, ellos se encuentran con violentas críticas por parte de la mayoría, y en cambio con más fuerza son aclamados por aquella minoría que aspira al ideal universal de la ciencia.
5Y, como Wronsky fue justamente uno de los representantes típicos de los sabios de la tendencia universal, de los grandes místicos ocultistas que han tratado de revelar a los especialistas los orígenes sagrados de la ciencia y su relación con la religión, se comprende el porqué de la reacción producida por su obra en el medio científico.
6Veamos como la teoría algorítmica de Wronsky, que es la base de su obra matemática, se funda enteramente en las enseñanzas tradicionales de los antiguos iniciados y místicos, sobre el Ternario y el Cuaternario.
7La CAUSA PRIMERA, aún siendo UNA e indivisible, considerada como Creador, su Naturaleza es Trina: el Uno contiene en potencia el ternario: Voluntad-Amor- Sabiduría, que son los tres atributos primitivos de Dios.
8La Voluntad y el Amor son los dos polos opuestos de su naturaleza y su acción mutua produce la Sabiduría.
9Observemos que la naturaleza de la Voluntad y del Amor son opuestos; la Voluntad tiene carácter discontinuo, de fecundación; es la semilla, el Padre, el estado potencial.
10El Amor es el carácter continuo, de crecimiento, germinación; es la Madre, el estado de devenir.
11La voluntad fecundando el Amor produce la Sabiduría, que participa de las características de ambos; es el Hijo, la neutralización de ellos.
12Este es el Ternario divino o el plano espiritual más elevado.
13Pero, para pasar a un plano más concreto, para poder cumplir la Obra, este Ternario necesita de otro atributo, también primitivo, que es la Acción, formándose así el Cuaternario primitivo espiritual.
14Estos son los cuatro atributos primitivos de la Divinidad, siendo todos los demás derivados de estos cuatro.
15El cuarto atributo primitivo, o sea, la Acción, tiene también otra función espiritual que es la siguiente.
16La Voluntad y la Sabiduría producen combinadas la Justicia; el Amor y la Sabiduría producen combinados el Sacrificio; estos dos nuevos atributos, Justicia y Sacrificio, ya no son atributos primitivos, sino derivados.
17Vemos, pues, que la Sabiduría es común a los dos atributos derivados y establece entre ellos una especie de ligazón, una especie de unidad; de dónde resulta la necesidad de un atributo primitivo que establece la transición entre Justicia y Sacrificio y recíprocamente.
18Este atributo primitivo, es evidentemente la Acción, que es la transición entre dos atributos derivados, y se forma así el cuaternario primitivo: Voluntad-Amor-Sabiduría-Acción.
19Lo dicho puede esquematizarse se esta forma 16
The source text as printed, transcribed diplomatically. Where the source language uses a non-Latin script that reaches us only through a Victorian romanisation, this layer is labelled transliteration, because that is what we hold.
1Evidently there are those who share the characteristics of both groups at once.
2The first are those who bring the germs of new conceptions, the great abstract ideas; the second develop the particular ideas already existing, carrying them constructively to ever more concrete planes and perfecting their details.
3The one kind fecundate [Sic: “fecunda” printed for “fecundan”]; the others build.
4The great initiates of antiquity, as well as some modern mystics and thinkers, belong to the first group mentioned, and their ideas are seldom understood and recognised; whereas modern savants for the most part belong to the second group, since in the last centuries the differentiation of knowledge prevails in science. For this reason, when from time to time there appear thinkers who try to carry science back to its true and mystical origin, they meet with violent criticism from the majority, and are on the other hand acclaimed the more strongly by that minority which aspires to the universal ideal of science.
5And since Wronsky was precisely one of the typical representatives of the savants of the universal tendency — of the great occultist mystics who have tried to reveal to the specialists the sacred origins of science and its relation to religion — one understands the reason for the reaction produced by his work in the scientific milieu.
6Let us see how Wronsky's algorithmic theory, which is the basis of his mathematical work, is founded entirely upon the traditional teachings of the ancient initiates and mystics concerning the Ternary and the Quaternary.
7The FIRST CAUSE, while being ONE and indivisible, considered as Creator, is Triune in Nature: the One contains in potency the ternary Will–Love–Wisdom, which are the three primitive attributes of God.
8Will and Love are the two opposite poles of his nature, and their mutual action produces Wisdom.
9Let us observe that the natures of Will and of Love are opposites: Will has a discontinuous character, of fecundation; it is the seed, the Father, the potential state.
10Love is the continuous character, of growth, of germination; it is the Mother, the state of becoming.
11Will fecundating Love produces Wisdom, which shares the characteristics of both; it is the Son, the neutralisation of them.
12This is the divine Ternary, or the highest spiritual plane.
13But in order to pass to a more concrete plane, in order to be able to accomplish the Work, this Ternary needs another attribute, likewise primitive, which is Action — the primitive spiritual Quaternary being thus formed.
14These are the four primitive attributes of the Divinity, all the rest being derived from these four.
15The fourth primitive attribute, that is, Action, has also another spiritual function, which is the following.
16Will and Wisdom combined produce Justice; Love and Wisdom combined produce Sacrifice; these two new attributes, Justice and Sacrifice, are no longer primitive attributes but derived ones.
17We see, then, that Wisdom is common to the two derived attributes and establishes between them a kind of bond, a kind of unity; whence follows the necessity of a primitive attribute establishing the transition between Justice and Sacrifice and reciprocally.
18This primitive attribute is evidently Action, which is the transition between two derived attributes; and thus is formed the primitive quaternary: Will–Love–Wisdom–Action.
19What has been said may be schematised in this form: 16
Our translation, period-faithful. Citable as our translation, never as the source.
Jehel's third article on Papus, running from Nº 6. With this number Volume I closes: eight issues, May to December 1942.
"Absolute equality is a dream — or better said, an unnatural absurdity" is the hardest sentence in the issue. Read against what follows, the author is not defending privilege: he redefines equality as equal obligation to give all one actually can. The distinction is his, and it should not be quoted without its next paragraph.
The printed text reads "cera automáticamente" where the sense requires "creará". Recorded as a compositor's slip, marked [Sic] in the translation rather than silently mended.
Analogy as the greatest law of the universe is the Emerald Tablet's correspondence doctrine, and recurs on p. 2 as "what is ABOVE is as what is BELOW" and again on p. 17 as the ground of Wronski's whole scheme. The issue is unusually consistent in its first principle.
The four Orders of Knowledge are mapped to the letters of the Tetragrammaton reading upward — Nature to the final He, Man to Vau, the Agents of Creation to the first He, the True Light to Iod. The ascent runs from the densest knowledge to the most primordial.
Papus's mockery of those who mistake a subscription receipt for initiation is aimed squarely at the popular occult societies of the day — and, by implication, at some of this magazine's own readership.
This passage was raised by the automated screen for the words "casta, secta, nación o raza" and cleared on reading. It teaches the opposite of racial doctrine: give to others without particularity of family, caste, sect, nation or race. Nothing is withheld. Recorded so the screening decision is auditable.
The first of three appearances of Wronski in this issue. Nº 6 (p. 17) had promised an article on "the metaphysical-mystical theory of Wronski"; the promise is kept on p. 15 of this number. Józef Hoene-Wroński (1776–1853) was the Polish mathematician-messianist whom Eliphas Lévi took as a master, and the detail that he died destitute near Paris is repeated at p. 15.
"Microprosopus" is the Zohar's Zeir Anpin, the Lesser Countenance, reaching this Montevideo page through the French kabbalistic literature Papus drew on rather than from the Aramaic.
The "body of glory" is Paul's σῶμα τῆς δόξης, Philippians 3:21. The article makes it a task for this life rather than a promise for the next — a characteristic move of the magazine.
The Master Mason's march is read onto the chakra column: terrestrial magnetism entering at the feet, bipolarised at the sex, radiant at the spleen, the two entwined serpents closing at the cardiac plexus. This is a Theosophical subtle anatomy laid over a masonic floor-diagram — the two systems are being fused, not compared.
The quoted Martinist formula — that man may regain his primitive place by returning upon his own steps, following the very paths that led him astray — is the doctrine of reintegration, Martinez de Pasqually's central teaching and the reason the Order exists.
"A Power is always and only a Duty disinterestedly fulfilled" is the ethical hinge of the whole run, and the sentence to quote if only one is quoted from Volume I.
The etymology offered for Israel — Ish-Wara-El, read as "the Supreme, the God of Gods" — is fanciful; the name is Hebrew, and the article silently borrows the Sanskrit Ishvara to make it work. Recorded as the author's construction, not as philology.
Raised by the automated screen for "secta, nación o raza" and cleared on reading. Solomon is praised precisely for acting across those lines, consulting the chief of another sect, nation or race. The passage teaches solidarity; nothing is withheld.
The chain Tyre → TARO → ROTA is the classic anagram of the Wheel, and the author leans on it to turn a Phoenician king into an emblem of karmic law. The wordplay works only in the Latin alphabet, and is a reading imposed on the legend rather than drawn from it.
The Hiram legend is read as an organisational parable: the break comes when Fellow Crafts believe themselves Masters before they have sacrificed. The magazine is addressing its own membership through the ritual.
That the purest must be sacrificed to save the work, and that the agents can only be those for whom the sacrifice is made, assimilates Hiram to Christ. The parallel is left implicit here and never argued.
Surya's astrology course, running since Nº 3, reaches the placement of planets in the chart. The worked example is a birth of August 1942 — contemporaneous with the issue.
The Wheel of Fortune calculation is arithmetically sound as printed. Ascendant Capricorn 15º34′ (10·15·34) plus Moon Leo 2º41′ (5·2·41) gives 15·17·75; less Sun Leo 17º28′ (5·17·28) leaves 10·00·47 — the tenth sign at 0º47′, as stated. Checked digit by digit.
"The stars incline but do not compel" is the scholastic tag astra inclinant, non necessitant. Printed as a standing motto, it is the same doctrine Lorelair argues at length in Nº 7: the influence is neutral, the receiver decides.
The printed heading reads "SAVASANA73"; the figure is the glossary reference number 73, which the compositor set flush against the word. The glossary entry duly appears at the foot of p. 13.
The physiological claims made for Savasana here — recovery of energy, oxygenation, control of the nervous system — are presented as instruction rather than as report. They are reproduced as printed and are not endorsed; readers should treat them as a document of 1942 practice, not as medical guidance.
The derivation of Savasana from sava, "the pressing of Soma", is the author's own and is not the usual one: śava means corpse, and the posture is ordinarily the corpse pose. The article builds a whole Soma symbolism on the alternative reading.
The plant is printed as "Scrcostema viminalis"; the botanical name is Sarcostemma viminalis. Corrected in the translation with the printed form recorded.
The claim that "a great part" of the Rig-Veda, "composed of more than a hundred books", is dedicated to Soma overstates it: the Rig-Veda has ten mandalas, and the Soma hymns are concentrated in the ninth. The estate holds Müller's Vedic Hymns (SBE 32) against which the point can be checked.
Printed "la paz del cima", where the sense requires "del alma" — the peace of the soul. Marked [Sic] in the translation.
With this instalment the treatise on the planetary hours, begun in Nº 5, is complete: Saturn and Jupiter close the series, and the article is headed "Fin". Volume I therefore contains the whole cycle of hours.
Saturn as "the Cain who limits the Abel of space and expansion" is the author's own figure, welding the Greek Kronos to Genesis. The moral turn is characteristic: Saturn's power holds only over those who suffer his laws instead of collaborating with his cycles.
The sentence is garbled as printed, running two clauses together. The translation restores the evident sense — that these matters are treated on days when the Moon in Capricorn is well aspected — and marks the repair [Editorial] rather than passing it off as the source.
The chain RAM → LAM turns the bija of the fire centre into that of the earth centre, and reads the change as a Temporal chief becoming a Spiritual one. The tattwa assignments here (Prithivi with smell and the tip of the nose) follow the standard Theosophical tables.
Here the promise made in Nº 6 is kept: the article on Wronski's algorithmic theory, signed by Vyasa, S∴I∴ and Kabir, A∴M∴ Kabir is the contributor whose citations of Papus the Press has verified word for word against the acquired volume, which is some evidence of his care with sources.
That Hoene-Wroński died in poverty, dismissed by positivist contemporaries, is accurate. The article's framing of him as "one of the most salient figures of Martinism" is the magazine's claim rather than a matter of record.
Will–Love–Wisdom is the Theosophical trinity, the same triad the Schopenhauer article in Nº 7 used at p. 20. Here it is made to generate a mathematics; there it was made to absorb the Will. The two articles are drawing on one scheme.
From here the article quotes Wroński directly and at length, on summation and graduation as the two opposed elementary algorithms. The Latin tags are printed corruptly — "pe: juxta positonem" and "per intris susceptionem" for per juxta positionem and per intus susceptionem — and are corrected with the printed forms recorded.
The mathematical claim is correct: the exponential is the unique function equal to its own derivative, which is why every growth process is written with it. The article's use of that fact as an emblem of Love is analogy, not proof, and it says so.
"The great theorem of Fermat, unsolved to this day" was accurate in 1942. It was proved by Andrew Wiles in 1994 and published in 1995 — 53 years after this page. The author's reason for its difficulty, that it is the simplest possible combination of sum and power, is a fair intuition about why the problem resisted.
Placing Wroński as "the natural continuation of Pythagoras" completes the article's argument: mathematics is being reclaimed as an initiatic science. Whether Wroński's mathematics supports the reading is another matter — his algorithmic theory was not accepted by his contemporaries.
Endovellicus was a real pre-Roman deity of the western Iberian peninsula, attested by numerous votive inscriptions in what is now the Alentejo. The article's identification of him as "the Galician god" served by a surviving priesthood is a much larger claim than the epigraphy supports.
Manuel Murguía (1833–1923), the Galician historian, is quoted at second hand. The Press has not acquired the volume; the quotation is recorded as printed.
Mario Roso de Luna (1872–1931), the Spanish Theosophist, is invoked as having written on the Baluros "what it is not forbidden to divulge" — the familiar move of citing an authority while claiming a reserve. His works are a sourcing target for the estate.
The claim that Catholicism substituted Mary for Diana and the Jacobean legend for the solar cult is the standard nineteenth-century syncretist reading. It is asserted here rather than argued, and the Compostela evidence is more contested than the article allows.
Volume I ends with verse in French: Saint-Martin's "Le Cimetière d'Amboise", printed untranslated and marked "(Continuará)". The Press had searched for this poem externally without success — it is not among Saint-Martin's digitised works — and found it here, inside the corpus, serialised by the magazine itself. The left pane offers the French; the English is editorial.
Burlamaqui is Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui (1694–1748), the Genevan jurist of Principes du droit naturel. Saint-Martin trained in law before he met Pasqually, and the lines credit Burlamaqui's book with graving the foundations of justice in him — a rare glimpse of the secular formation behind the theosopher.
"That long blindness which men call life" closes the volume. The poem continues in later issues, so the reader who follows the run to its end returns to Saint-Martin — the figure Nº 5 had named beside Boehme, and whose own translation of Boehme the Press now holds.
This sentence is withheld. It was raised by the keyword screen and first cleared on the reading that it carried no hierarchy and no claim about racial character — it argues only that peoples and customs supposed to have come from the East in fact moved eastward from the West, and then uses that to claim priority for Galician religion over Asian. On the operator ruling of 2026-08-23 the exclusion is broader than that reading: period race-language in a pseudo-historical claim is not reproduced, hierarchy or not. The surrounding account of the solar cult is unaltered and the article can be followed without the withheld line.
Cancer 15º 34′ on the cusp of the seventh house is the exact complement of the Ascendant established in Nº 6 p. 11, Capricorn 15º 34′ — the seventh cusp being the Descendant, opposite the first. Three issues apart, the two figures agree to the arcminute.
The convention for writing a planet's position on the chart — the symbol, then degrees as numerator and minutes as denominator, in the manner of a fraction — is a drafting instruction rather than a doctrine, and the course gives it because a student copying the diagram would otherwise not know how the figures are meant to sit.
"If they do not do so, they will never really profit by the teachings of this Course, whose purpose is to make the PRACTICE of Astrology." The insistence is constant across the whole run — Nº 1 p. 19 supplies a datum for readers to check, Nº 2 p. 20 publishes three dates in advance, Nº 6 p. 11 invites readers to work the example from the beginning. The magazine repeatedly asks to be tested.