Texts of Confucianism, Part I: The Shû King, the Religious Portions of the Shih King, the Hsiâo King — SBE Vol. 3 (trans. James Legge, 1879)
English·1879–1910·trans. Georg Bühler & James Legge·397 passages
The text · part 17 of 19
Two of them were made by myself ;—the one about thirty years ago, simply as an exercise for my own improvement in Chinese; the other four years ago, when I was anxious to understand fully the Confucian teaching on the subject of Filial Piety, but without reference to my earlier version.
The third is a translation in the fourth volume of the Chinese Repository, pp. 345-353 (1835), for the accuracy of which much cannot be said. Very few notes are appended to it. The fourth is in the ‘Mémoires concernant les Chinois’ (Paris, 1779), being part of a long treatise on the ‘Ancient and Modern-Doctrine of the Chinese about Filial Piety,” by P. Cibot. In a preliminary notice to his version of our classic, he says :—‘ P. Noél formerly translated the Hsiao King into Latin. Our translation will necessarily be different from his. He laboured on the old text, and we on the new, which the scholars of the Imperial College have adopted. Besides this, he hasp. 463 launched out into paraphrase, and we have made it our business to present the text in French such as it is in Chinese.’ I have not been able to refer to P. Noél’s translation in preparing that now given to the public; but I had his work before me when writing out my earliest version. The difference between the old and modern texts is too slight to affect the character of translations of them, but P. Noél’s version is decidedly periphrastic. The title of his work is: —‘SINENSIS IMPERII LIBRI CLASSICI SEx, nimirum Adultorum Schola, Immutabile Medium, Liber sententiarum, Mencius, Filialis Observantia, Parvulorum Schola, e Sinico idiomate in Latinum traducti a P. Fr, Noél, S.J. (Prague, 1711).’ The present version, I believe, gives the text in English, such as it is in Chinese, more accurately and closely than P. Cibot’s does in French,
THE HSIAO KING.
Cuapter I. Tue Scope AND MEANING OF THE TREATISE.
(OncE), when Aung-nt' was unoccupied, and his disciple 34ng? was sitting by in attendance on him, the Master said, ‘Shan, the ancient kings had a perfect virtue and all-embracing rule of conduct, through which they were in accord with all under heaven. By the practice of it the people were brought to live in peace and harmony, and there was no ill-will between superiors and inferiors. Do you know what it was’?’ 3ang rose from his mat, and said, ‘ How
’ Kung-nt was the designation or marriage-name of Confucius. We find it twice in the Doctrine of the Mean (chh. 2 and 30), applied to the sage by 3ze-sze, his grandson, the reputed author of that treatise. By his designation, it is said, a grandson might speak of his grandfather, and therefore some scholars contend that the Classic of Filial Piety should also be ascribed to 3ze-sze ; but such a canon cannot be considered as sufficiently established. On the authorship of the Classic, see the Introduction, p. 451.
On the authorship of the Classic, see the Introduction, p. 451.
* 3ang-zze, named Shin, and styled 3ze-yii, was one of the most distinguished of the disciples of Confucius. He was a favourite with the sage, and himself a voluminous writer. Many incidents and sayings are related, illustrative of his filial piety, so that it was natural for the master to enter with him on the discussion of that virtue. He shares in the honour and worship still paid to Confucius, and is one of his ‘Four Assessors’ in his temples.
* Both the translator in the Chinese Repository and P. Cibot have rendered this opening address of Confucius very imperfectly.
(t] Hhp. 466 should I, Shin, who am so devoid of intelligence, be able to know this?’ The Master said, ‘ (It was filial piety). Now filial piety is the root of (all) virtue!, and (the stem) out of which grows (all moral) teaching. Sit down again, and I will explain the subject to you. Our bodies—to every hair and bit of skin—are received by us from our parents, and we must not presume to injure or wound them :—this is the beginning of filial piety. When we have established our character by the practice of the (filial) course, so as to make our name famous in future ages, and thereby glorify our parents :—this is the end of filial piety. It commences with the service
The former has:—‘Do you understand how the ancient kings, who possessed the greatest virtue and the best moral principles, rendered the whole empire so obedient that the people lived in peace and harmony, and no ill-will existed between superiors and inferiors?’? The other:—‘ Do you know what was the pre-eminent virtue and the essential doctrine which our ancient monarchs taught to all the empire, to maintain concord among their subjects, and banish all dissatisfaction between superiors and inferiors?’
P. Cibot comes the nearer to the meaning of the text, but he has neglected the characters corresponding to ‘through which they were in accord with all under heaven,’ that are expounded clearly enough by Hsiian Bung. The sentiment of the sage is, as he has tersely expressed it in the Doctrine of the Mean (ch. 13), that the ancient kings ‘governed men, according to their nature, with what is proper to them.’
Such is the way in which AQ Hsf and other critical scholars reconcile the statements of the text here and elsewhere with their theory as to the constituents of humanity.
~_~--——- -—"
p. 467
of parents; it proceeds to the service of the ruler; it is completed by the establishment of the character. ‘It is said in the Major Odes of the Kingdom, “Ever think of your ancestor, Cultivating your virtue'.”’
Cuapter II. Fina, Piety IN THE Son oF HEAVEN.
He who loves his parents will not dare (to incur the risk of) being hated by any man, and he who reveres his parents will not dare (to incur the risk of) being contemned by any man*. When the love and reverence (of the Son of Heaven) are thus carried to the utmost in the service of his parents, the lessons of his virtue affect all the people, and he becomes
1 See the Shih King, III, i, ode 2, stanza 4. Ad Hst commences his expurgation of our classic with casting out this concluding paragraph; and rightly so. Such quotations of the odes and other passages in the ancient classics are not after the manner of Confucius. The application made: of them, moreover, is often far-fetched, and away from their proper meaning.
-* The thing thus generally stated must be understood specially of the sovereign, and only he who stands related to all other men can give its full manifestation. Previous translators have missed the peculiarity of the construction in each of the clauses. Thus P. Cibot gives :—‘ He who loves his parents will not dare to hate any one,’ &c. But in the second member we have a well-known form in Chinese to give the force of the passive voice. Attention is called to this in the Extensive Explanation of the Hsifo (see p. 461):—‘W yi zin does not mean merely to hate men; it indicates an anxious apprehension lest the hatred of men should light on me, and my parents thereby be involved in it.’
Hh2
*
\p. 468 a pattern to (all within) the four seas! :—this is the filial piety of the Son of Heaven *. It is said in (the Marquis of) FQ on Punishments’, ‘The One man will have felicity, and the millions of the people will depend on (what ensures his happiness).’
Cuapter III.
FiniaL Piety In THE PRINCES OF STATES.
Above others, and yet free from pride, they dwell on high, without peril; adhering to economy, and carefully observant of the rules and laws, they are full, without overflowing. To dwell on high without peril is the way long to preserve nobility; to be full without overflowing is the way long to preserve riches. When their riches and nobility do not leave their persons, then they are able to preserve the altars of their land and grain, and to secure the harmony of their people and men in office ¢ :—this is the filial piety of the princes of states.
When their riches and nobility do not leave their persons, then they are able to preserve the altars of their land and grain, and to secure the harmony of their people and men in office ¢ :—this is the filial piety of the princes of states.
1 Chinese scholars make ‘the people’ to be the subjects of the king, and ‘all within the four seas’ to be the barbarous tribes outside the four borders of the kingdom, between them and the seas or oceans within which the habitable earth was contained—according to the earliest geographical conceptions. All we have to find in the language is the unbounded, the universal, influence of ‘the Son of Heaven.’
* The appellation ‘Son of Heaven’ for the sovereign was unknown in the earliest times of the Chinese nation, It cannot be traced beyond the Shang dynasty.
5 See the Shi, V, xxvii, 4, and the note on the name of that Book, p. 254.
* In the Chinese Repository we have for this:—‘ They will be able to protect their ancestral possessions with the produce of their lands;’ ‘They will make sure the supreme rank to their a
CH, Iv. FILIAL PIETY IN HIGH OFFICERS. 469
It is said in the Book of Poetry}, ‘ Be apprehensive, be cautious, As if on the brink of a deep abyss, As if treading on thin ice.’
CuapTer IV. Firat Piety in Hicu Ministers AND GREAT OFFICERS.
They do not presume to wear robes other than . those appointed by the laws of the ancient kings ?; nor to speak words other than those sanctioned by their speech ; nor to exhibit conduct other than that exemplified by their virtuous ways. Thus none of their words being contrary to those sanctions, and none of their actions contrary to the (right) way, families.’ But it is better to retain the style of the original. The king had a great altar to the spirit (or spirits) presiding over the land. The colour of the earth in the centre of.it was yellow; that on each of its four sides differed according to the colours assigned to the four quarters of the sky. A portion of this earth was cut away, and formed the nucleus of a corresponding altar in each feudal state, according to their position relative to the capital. The prince of the state had the prerogative of sacrificing there. A similar rule prevailed for the altars to the spirits presiding over the grain. So long as a family ruled in a state, so long its chief offered those sacrifices; and the extinction of the sacrifices was an emphatic way of describing the ruin and extinction of the ruling House.
1 See the Shih, II, v, ode 1, stanza 6.
So long as a family ruled in a state, so long its chief offered those sacrifices; and the extinction of the sacrifices was an emphatic way of describing the ruin and extinction of the ruling House.
1 See the Shih, II, v, ode 1, stanza 6.
* The articles of dress, to be worn by individuals according to their rank, from the sovereign downwards, in their ordinary attire, and on special occasions, were the subject of attention and enactment in China from the earliest times. We find references to them in the earliest books of the Shf (Part II, Books iii, iv). The words to be spoken, and conduct to be exhibited, on every varying occasion, could not be so particularly described; but the example of the ancient kings would suffice for these, as their enactments for the dress.
470 THE HSIAO KING. CH. Vv.
from their mouths there comes no exceptionable speech, and in their conduct there are found no exceptionable actions. Their words may fill all under heaven, and no error of speech will be found in them. Their actions may fill all under heaven, and no dissatisfaction or dislike will be awakened by them. When these three things—(their robes, their words, and their conduct)—are all complete as they should be, they can then preserve their ancestral temples?:—this is the filial piety of high ministers and great officers. It is said in the Book of Poetry 2,
‘He is never idle, day or night, In the service of the One man.’
CuapTer V, Fiviav Piety in INFERIOR OFFICERS.
As they serve their fathers, so they serve their mothers, and they love them equally. As they serve their fathers, so they serve their rulers, and they reverence them equally. Hence love is what is chiefly rendered to the mother, and reverence is what is chiefly rendered to the ruler, while both of these things are given to the father. Therefore when they serve their ruler with filial piety they are loyal; when they serve their superiors with reverence they are obedient. Not failing in this loyalty
' Their ancestral temples were to the ministers and grand officers what the altars of their land and grain were to the feudal lords. Every great officer had three temples or shrines, in which he sacrificed to the first chief of his family or clan; to his grandfather, and to his father. While these remained, the family remained, and its honours were perpetuated.
? See the Shih, III, iii, ode 6, stanza 4.
p. 471
and obedience in serving those above them, they are then able to preserve their emoluments and positions, and to maintain their sacrifices !:—this is the filial piety of inferior officers *. It is said in the Book of Poetry®, ‘ Rising early and going to sleep late, Do not disgrace those who gave you birth.’
Cuapter VI. FitiaL Prety 1n THE Common PEOPLE.
They follow the course of heaven (in the revolving seasons); they distinguish the advantages
It is said in the Book of Poetry®, ‘ Rising early and going to sleep late, Do not disgrace those who gave you birth.’
Cuapter VI. FitiaL Prety 1n THE Common PEOPLE.
They follow the course of heaven (in the revolving seasons); they distinguish the advantages i 1 These officers had their ‘positions’ or places, and their pay. They had also their sacrifices, but such as were private or personal to themselves, so that we have not much information about them.
* The Chinese Repository has here, ‘Such is the influence of filial duty when performed by scholars;’ and P. Cibot, ‘Voila sommairement ce qui caractérise la Piété Filiale du Lettré.’ But to use the term ‘scholar’ here is to translate from the standpoint of modern China, and not from that of the time of Confucius, The Shih of feudal China were the younger sons of the higher classes, and men that by their ability were rising out of the lower, and who were all in inferior situations, and looking forward to offices of trust in the service of the royal court, or of their several states. Below the ‘great officers’ of ch. 4, three classes of Shih—the highest, middle, lowest — were recognised, all intended in this chapter. When the feudal system had passed away, the class of
‘scholars’ gradually took their place. Shih (qb) is one of the oldest characters in Chinese, but the idea expressed in its formation is not known. Confucius is quoted in the Shwo Wan as making it to be from the characters for one (—) and ten (+>). A very old definition of it is—‘The denomination of one entrusted with affairs.’ 5 See the Shih, II, iii, ode 2, stanza 6.
p. 472
afforded by (different) soils!; they are careful of their conduct and economical in their expenditure ;—in order to nourish their parents :—this is the filial piety of the common people.
Therefore from the Son of Heaven down to the common people, there never has been one whose filial piety was without its beginning and end on whom calamity did not come.
CuaptTer VII. FiviaL Piety in RELATION TO THE THREE PowErs?.
The disciple 3ang said, ‘Immense indeed is the greatness of filial piety!’ The Master replied,
1 These two sentences describe the attention of the people to the various processes of agriculture, as conditioned by the seasons and the qualities of different soils.
With this chapter there ends what XQ Hst regarded as the only portion of the Hsiao in which we can rest as having come from Confucius. So far, it is with him a continuous discourse that proceeded from the sage. And there is, in this portion, especially when we admit X(0’s expurgations, a certain sequence and progress, without logical connexion, in the exhibition of the subject which we fail to find in the chapters that follow.
* «The Three Powers’ is a phrase which is first found in two of the Appendixes to the Yi King, denoting Heaven, Earth, and Man, as the three great agents or agencies in nature, or the circle of being.
* «The Three Powers’ is a phrase which is first found in two of the Appendixes to the Yi King, denoting Heaven, Earth, and Man, as the three great agents or agencies in nature, or the circle of being.
® The whole of the reply of Confucius here, down to ‘the advantages afforded by earth,’ is found in a narrative in the 30 Awan, under the twenty-fifth year of duke A’A4o (s.c. 517), with the important difference that the discourse is there about ‘ceremonies,’ and not about filial piety. Plainly, it is an interpolation in the Hsiao, and is rightly thrown out by XQ and Wa AAang. To my own mind it was a relief to find that the passage was not genuine, and had not come from Confucius. The discourse in the 30 Kwan, which is quite lengthy, these sentences being only the com-
p. 473
‘Yes, filial piety is the constant (method) of Heaven, the righteousness of Earth, and the practical duty of Man?. Heaven and earth invariably pursue the course (that may be thus described), and the people take it as their pattern. (The ancient kings) imitated the brilliant luminaries of heaven, and acted in accordance with the (varying) advantages afforded by earth, so that they were in accord with all under heaven ; and in consequence their teachings, without being severe, were successful, and their government, without being rigorous, secured perfect order.
mencement of it, is more than sufficiently fanciful ; but it is conceivable that what is here predicated of filial piety might be spoken of ceremonies, while I never could see what it could have to do with filial piety, or filial piety with it. After the long discourse in the 30 Awan one of the interlocutors in it exclaims, ‘Immense, indeed, is the greatness of ceremonies!’—the same terms with which 34ng-3ze is made to commence this chapter, saving that we have ‘ceremonies’ instead of ‘filial piety.’ There can be no doubt that the passage is interpolated; and yet the first part of it is quoted by Pan Ki (in our first century), in a note to Lif Hin’s Catalogue, and also in the Amplification of the First Precept of the Khang-hsf Sacred Edict (in our eighteenth century). Pan Kf may not have been sufficiently acquainted with the 30 A’wan to detect the forgery ; that Chinese scholars should still quote the description as applicable to filial piety shows how liable they are to be carried away by fine-sounding terms and mysterious utterances.
P. Cibot gives a correct translation of the first part in a note, but adds that it carries the sense of the text much too high, and would bring it into collision with the prejudices of the west, and he has preferred to hold to the more common explanation :—‘ Ce qu’est la régularité des monuments des astres pour le firmament, la fertilité des campagnes pour Ia terre, la Piété Filiale est constamment pour les peuples!’
1 An amusing translation of this sentence is found in Samuel — Johnson’s ‘ Oriental Religions, China,’ p. 208, beginning, ‘ Filial Piety is the Book of Heaven!’ Mr. Johnson does not say where he got this version.
p. 474
‘The ancient kings, seeing how their teachings! could transform the people, set before them therefore an example of the most extended love, and none of the people neglected their parents; they set forth to them (the nature of) virtue and righteousness, and the people roused themselves to the practice of them ; they went before them with reverence and yielding courtesy, and the people had no contentions ; they led them on by the rules of propriety and by music, and the people were harmonious and benignant ; they showed them what they loved and what they disliked, and the people understood their prohibitions.
‘It is said in the Book of Poetry’,
* Awe-inspiring are you, O Grand-Master Yin, | And the people all look up to you.”’
CuHapter VIII. Fivrat Piety in GOVERNMENT.
The Master said, ‘ Anciently, when the intelligent kings by means of filial piety ruled all under heaven, they did not dare to receive with disrespect the ministers of small states;—how much less would they do so to the dukes, marquises, counts, and barons!’ Thus it was that they got (the princes of) the myriad states with joyful hearts (to assist them) in the (sacrificial) services to their royal predecessors *.
1 Sze-m4 Kwang changes the character for ‘ teachings’ here into that for ‘filial piety.’ There is no external evidence for such a reading; and the texture of the whole treatise is so loose that we cannot insist on internal evidence.
2 See the Shih, II, iv, ode 7, stanza 1.
® Under the au dynasty there were five orders of nobility, and the states belonging to their rulers varied proportionally in size.
p. 475
‘The rulers of states did not dare to slight wifeless men and widows ;—how much less would they slight their officers and the people! Thus it was that they got all their people with joyful hearts (to assist them) in serving the rulers, their predecessors }.
‘The heads of clans did not dare to slight their servants and concubines ;—how much less would they slight their wives and sons! Thus it was that they got their men with joyful hearts (to assist them) in the service of their parents.
‘In such a state of things, while alive, parents reposed in (the glory of) their sons ; and, when sacrificed to, their disembodied spirits enjoyed their offerings’, Therefore all under heaven peace and harmony prevailed ; disasters and calamities did not occur; misfortunes and rebellions did not arise.
‘It is said in the Book of Poetry ,
“To an upright, virtuous conduct
All in the four quarters of the state render obedient homage.” ’
‘It is said in the Book of Poetry ,
“To an upright, virtuous conduct
All in the four quarters of the state render obedient homage.” ’
There were besides many smaller states attached to these. The feudal lords at stated times appeared at the royal court, and one important duty which then devolved on them was to take part in the sacrificial services of the sovereign in the ancestral temple.
1 These services were also the sacrifices in the ancestral temples of the rulers of the states and of the chiefs of clans,—the feudal princes and the ministers and great officers of chapters 3 and 4.
* In the Chinese Repository we read here:—‘ Parents enjoyed tranquillity while they lived, and after their decease sacrifices were offered to their disembodied spirits.’ To the same effect P.Cibot :— ‘Les péres et meres étoient heureux pendant la vie, et aprés leur mort leurs Ames étoient consolées par des Tsf (sacrifices).’ I believe that I have caught the meaning more exactly.
5 See the Shih, ITI, iii, ode 2, stanza 2.
476 THE HSIAO KING. CH. Ix.
CuapTer IX. Tue GoveRNMENT OF THE SaGEs!?.
The disciple 34ng said, ‘I venture to ask whether in the virtue of the sages there was not something greater than filial piety.’ The Master replied, ‘ Of all (creatures with their different) natures produced by Heaven and Earth, man is the noblest. Of all the actions of man there is none greater than filial piety. In filial piety there is nothing greater than the reverential awe of one’s father. In the reverential awe shown to one’s father there is nothing greater than the making him the correlate of Heaven*. The duke of AKAu was the man who (first) did this %
In the reverential awe shown to one’s father there is nothing greater than the making him the correlate of Heaven*. The duke of AKAu was the man who (first) did this %
* See a note on p. 99 on the meaning of the phrase ‘ the fellow of God,’ which is the same as that in this chapter, translated ‘the correlate of God.’ P. Cibot goes at length into a discussion of the idea conveyed by the Chinese character P‘ei, but without coming to any definite conclusion ; and indeed Tai Thung, author of the dictionary Lid Sh KA, says that ‘its original significancy has baffled investigation, while its classical usage is in the sense of “mate,” “fellow.”’ The meaning here is the second assigned to iton p. 99. Inthe Chinese Repository we find :—‘ As a mark of reverence there is nothing more important than to place the father on an equality with heaven ;’ which is by no means the idea, while the author further distorts the meaning by the following note :— ‘T‘ien, “ Heaven,” and Shang Ti, the ‘Supreme Ruler,” seem to be perfectly synonymous ; and whatever ideas the Chinese attach to them, it is evident that the noble lord of X4u regarded his ancestors, immediate and remote, as their equals, and paid to the one the same homage as the other. In thus elevating mortals to an equality with the Supreme Ruler, he is upheld and approved by Confucius, and has been imitated by myriads of every generation of his countrymen down to the present day.’
® It is difficult to say in what the innovation of the duke of Xau
p. 477
‘Formerly the duke of A4u at the border altar sacrificed to H4u-At as the correlate of Heaven, and in the Brilliant Hall he honoured king W4An, and sacrificed to him as the correlate of God?. The consisted. The editors of the Extensive Explanation of the Hsiao say :—‘ According to commentators on our classic, Shun thinking only of the virtue of his ancestor did not sacrifice to him at the border altar. The sovereigns of Hsia and Yin were the first to sacrifice there to their ancestors ; but they had not the ceremony of sacrificing to their fathers as the correlates of Heaven. This began with the duke of Kau.’ To this explanation of the text the editors demur, and consider that the noun ‘father’ in the previous sentence should be taken, in the case of the duke of Xu, both of Hau- and king Wan.
This began with the duke of Kau.’ To this explanation of the text the editors demur, and consider that the noun ‘father’ in the previous sentence should be taken, in the case of the duke of Xu, both of Hau- and king Wan.
1 The reader of the translations from the Shih must be familiar with H4u-4i, as the ancestor to whom the kings of A4u traced their lineage, and with king Wan, as the acknowledged founder of their dynasty in connexion with his son, king WQ. Was any greater honour done to Hau-Ai in making him the correlate of Heaven than to king Wan in making him the correlate of God? We must say, No. Asis said inthe Extensive Explanation, ‘The words Heaven and God are different, but their meaning is one and the same.’ The question is susceptible of easy determination. Let me refer the reader to the translations from the Shih on pp. 317 and 329. The tenth piece on the latter was sung, at the border sacrifice to Heaven, in honour of H4u-éi; and the first four lines of it are to the effect—
‘O thou, accomplished, great Hau-éi! To thee alone ’twas given To be, by what we trace to thee, The correlate of Heaven;’ while the fifth and sixth lines are— “God had the wheat and barley meant To nourish all mankind. None would have fathomed His intent, But for thy guiding mind.’ The seventh piece on the former page was used at the sacrifice, in the Brilliant Hall, to king W4n, as ‘the correlate of God.’ The first three lines have been versified by—
p. 478
consequence was that from (all the states) within the four seas, every (prince) came in the discharge of his duty to (assist in those) sacrifices. In the virtue of the sages what besides was there greater than filial piety ?
‘Now the feeling of affection grows up at the parents’ knees, and as (the duty of) nourishing those parents is exercised, the affection daily merges in awe. The sages proceeded from the (feeling of) awe to teach (the duties of) reverence, and from (that of) affection to teach (those of) love. The teachings of the sages, without being severe, were successful, and their government, without being rigo-
The sages proceeded from the (feeling of) awe to teach (the duties of) reverence, and from (that of) affection to teach (those of) love. The teachings of the sages, without being severe, were successful, and their government, without being rigo-
‘My offerings here are given, A ram, a bull. Accept them, mighty Heaven, All-bountiful ;’ and the sixth and seventh, lines by— ‘From Wan comes blessing rich; Now on the right He owns those gifts to which Him I invite.’ Since ‘Heaven’ and ‘God’ have the same reference, why are they used here as if there were some opposition between them? The nearest approach to an answer to this is found also in the Extensive Explanation, derived mainly from Ain Hsiang-t4o, of the Sung dynasty, and to the following effect :—‘ Heaven (Tien) just is God (Ti). Heaven is a term specially expressive of honour, and Hau-éf was made the correlate of Heaven, because he was remote, far distant from the worshipper. God is a term expressive of affection, and king Wan was made the correlate of God, because he was nearer to, the father of, the duke of Adu.’ Hsiang-téo concludes by saying that the sacrifice at the border altar was an old institution, while that in the Brilliant Hall was first appointed by the duke of Kau. According to this view, Heaven would approximate to the name for Deity in the absolute,—Jehovah, as explained in Exodus xv. 14; while Tf is God, ‘our Father in heaven,’
cH. 1X. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE SAGES. 479 rous, was effective. What they proceeded from was the root (of filial piety implanted by Heaven).
‘The relation and duties between father and son, (thus belonging to) the Heaven-conferred nature, (contain in them the principle of) righteousness between ruler and subject?. The son derives his life from his parents, and no greater gift could possibly be transmitted; his ruler and parent (in one), his father deals with him accordingly, and no generosity could be greater than this. Hence, he who does not love his parents, but loves other men, is called a rebel against virtue; and he who does not revere his parents, but reveres other men, is called a rebel against propriety. When (the ruler) himself thus acts contrary to (the principles) which should place him in accord (with all men), he presents nothing for the people to imitate. He has nothing to do with what is good, but entirely and only with what is injurious to virtue. Though he may get (his will, and be above others), the superior man does not give him his approval.
He has nothing to do with what is good, but entirely and only with what is injurious to virtue. Though he may get (his will, and be above others), the superior man does not give him his approval.
1 We find for this in the Chinese Repository :—‘ The feelings which ought to characterise the intercourse between father and son are of a heavenly nature, resembling the bonds which exist between a prince and his ministers.’ P. Cibot gives :—‘ Les rapports immuable de pére et de fils découlent de essence méme du Tien, et offrent la premitre idée de prince et de sujet ;’ adding on the former clause this note:—‘ Les commentateurs ne disent que des mots sur ces paroles; mais comment pourroient ils les bien expliquer, puisqu’ils ne sauroient en entrevoir le sens supreme et ineffable ? Quelques-uns ont pris le parti de citer le texte de Tao-teh King (ch. 42), “Le T Ao est vie et unité ; le premier a engendré le second ; les deux ont produit le troisitme; le trois ont fait toutes choses ;” c'est-a-dire, qu’ils ont taché d’expliquer un texte qui les passe, par un autre od ils ne comprennent rien.’ But there is neither difficulty in the construction of the text here, nor mystery in its meaning.
480 THE HSIAO KING. CH. xX.
‘It is not so with the superior man. He speaks, having thought whether the words should be spoken ; he acts, having thought whether his actions are sure to give pleasure. His virtue and righteousness are such as will be honoured ; what he initiates and does is fit to be imitated; his deportment is worthy of contemplation; his movements in advancing or retiring are all according to the proper rule. In this way does he present himself to the people, who both revere and love him, imitate and become like him. Thus he is able to make his teaching of virtue successful, and his government and orders to be carried into effect }.
‘It is said in the Book of Poetry ?,
“ The virtuous man, the princely one, Has nothing wrong in his deportment.”’
CuapTER X. AN Orpberty DESCRIPTION OF THE Acts oF Fiat PIEty.
The Master said, ‘The service which a filial son does to his parents is as follows :—In his general conduct to them, he manifests the utmost reverence ; in his nourishing of them, his endeavour is to give them the utmost pleasure; when they are ill, he feels the greatest anxiety; in mourning for them (dead), he exhibits every demonstration of grief; in sacrificing to them, he displays the utmost solemnity. When a son is complete in these five things (he may be pronounced) able to serve his parents.
1 This paragraph may be called a mosaic, formed by piecing together passages from the 30 Awan. * See the Shih, I, xiv, ode 3, stanza 3.
— —-
CH. XI. THE ALL-EMBRACING RULE. - 48t
When a son is complete in these five things (he may be pronounced) able to serve his parents.
1 This paragraph may be called a mosaic, formed by piecing together passages from the 30 Awan. * See the Shih, I, xiv, ode 3, stanza 3.
— —-
CH. XI. THE ALL-EMBRACING RULE. - 48t
‘He who (thus) serves his parents, in a high situation, will be free from pride; in a low situation, will be free from insubordination; and among his equals, will not be quarrelsome. In a high situation pride leads to ruin; in a low situation insubordination leads to punishment; among equals quarrelsomeness leads to the wielding of weapons.
‘If those three things be not put away, though a son every day contribute beef, mutton, and pork? to nourish his parents, he is not filial.’
CuarTeR XI. Fiviat Piety In RELATION TO THE FivE PUNISHMENTS.
The Master said, ‘There are three thousand offences against which the five punishments are directed?, and there is not one of them greater than being unfilial.
‘When constraint is put upon a ruler, that is the disowning of his superiority ; when the authority of the sages is disallowed, that is the disowning of (all) law; when filial piety is put aside, that is the disowning of the principle of affection. These (three things) pave the way to anarchy.’
CuHapTeR XII. AMPLIFICATION OF ‘THE ALL- EMBRACING RULE oF ConpucT’ IN CHAPTER I.
The Master said, ‘ For teaching the people to be affectionate and ‘loving there is nothing better than Filial Piety ; for teaching them (the observance of) propriety and submissiveness there is nothing better than Fraternal Duty; for changing their manners
1 Compare with this the Confucian Analects, II, vii. ® See the Sh, p. 43, and especially pp. 255, 256.
[1] Tip. 482 and altering their customs there is nothing better than Music ; for securing the repose of superiors and the good order of the people there is nothing better than the Rules of Propriety.
‘The Rules of Propriety are simply (the development of) the principle of Reverence. Therefore the reverence paid to a father makes (all) sons pleased ; the reverence paid to an elder brother makes (all) younger brothers pleased; the reverence paid to a ruler makes (all) subjects pleased'. The reverence paid to one man makes thousands and myriads of men pleased. The reverence is paid to a few, and the pleasure extends to many ;—this is what is meant by an “ All-embracing Rule of Canduct.”’
CuHapTer XIII. AMPLIFICATION OF ‘THE PERFECT ViRTUE’ IN CHAPTER I.
The Master said, ‘ The teaching of filial piety by the superior man? does not require that he should go to family after family, and daily see the members of each. His teaching of filial piety is a tribute of reverence to all the fathers under heaven; his teaching of fraternal submission is a tribute of reverence to all the elder brothers under heaven; his teaching of the duty of a subject is a tribute of reverence to all the rulers under heaven.
His teaching of filial piety is a tribute of reverence to all the fathers under heaven; his teaching of fraternal submission is a tribute of reverence to all the elder brothers under heaven; his teaching of the duty of a subject is a tribute of reverence to all the rulers under heaven.
1 We must understand that the ‘reverence’ here is to be understood as paid by the sovereign. In reverencing his father (or an uncle may also in Chinese usage be so styled), he reverences the idea of fatherhood, and being ‘in accord with the minds of all under heaven,’ his example is universally powerful. And we may reason similarly of the other two cases of reverence specified.
® The XAtin-3ze, or ‘superior man,’ here must be taken of the sovereign. P. Cibot translates it by ‘ un prince.’
p. 483
“It is said in the Book of Poetry}, “The happy and courteous sovereign Is the parent of the people.” ’ If it were not a perfect virtue, how could it be recognised as in accordance with their nature by the people so extensively as this ?’
CuarreR XIV. AMPLIFICATION OF ‘MAKING OUR Name Famous’ 1n Cuapter I.
The Master said, ‘ The filial piety with which the superior man serves his parents may be transferred as loyalty to the ruler ; the fraternal duty with which he serves his elder brother may be transferred as submissive deference to elders; his regulation of his family may be transferred as good government in any official position. Therefore, when his conduct is thus successful in his’ inner (private) circle, his name will be established (and transmitted) to future generations.’
CuapTeR XV. Fiviat Piety in RELATION To REPROOF AND REMONSTRANCE. .
The disciple 3ang said, ‘I have heard your instructions on the affection of love, on respect and reverence, on giving repose to (the minds of) our parents, and on making our name famous ;—I would venture to ask if (simple) obedience to the orders of one’s father can be pronounced filial piety.’ The Master replied, ‘What words are these! what words are these! Anciently, if the Son of Heaven had seven minister who would remonstrate with him,
1 See the Shih, III, ii, ode 7, stanza1. The two lines of the Shih here are, possibly, not an interpolation.
p. 112
p. 484
what words are these! Anciently, if the Son of Heaven had seven minister who would remonstrate with him,
1 See the Shih, III, ii, ode 7, stanza1. The two lines of the Shih here are, possibly, not an interpolation.
p. 112
p. 484
although he had not right methods of government, he would not lose his possession of the kingdom ; if the prince of a state had five such ministers, though his measures might be equally wrong, he would not lose his state; if a great officer had three, he would not, in a similar case, lose (the headship of) his clan; if an inferior officer had a friend who would remonstrate with him, a good name would not cease to be connected with his character; and the father who had a son that would remonstrate with him would not sink into the gulf of unrighteous deeds'. Therefore when a case of unrighteous conduct is concerned, a son must by no means keep from remonstrating with his father, nor a minister from remonstrating with his ruler. Hence, since remonstrance is required in the case of unrighteous conduct, how can (simple) obedience to the orders of a father be accounted filial piety *?’
CHAPTER XVI. THe INFLUENCE oF FILIAL PIETY AND THE RESPONSE TO IT.
The Master said, ‘ Anciently, the intelligent kings served their fathers with filial piety, and therefore they served Heaven with intelligence ; they served their mothers with filial piety, and therefore they served Earth with discrimination’. They pursuedp. 485 the right course with reference to their (own) seniors and juniors, and therefore they secured the regulation of the relations between superiors and inferiors (throughout the kingdom).
1 The numbers 7, 5, 3, 1 cannot be illustrated by examples, nor should they be insisted on. The higher the dignity, the greater would be the risk, and the stronger must be the support that was needed.
* Compare the Analects, IV, xviii, and the Lt X7, X, i, 15.
* This chapter is as difficult to grasp as the seventh, which treated of Filial Piety in Relation to ‘the Three Powers.’ It is indeed a sequel to that. Heaven and Earth appear as two Powers, or as
“When Heaven and Earth were served with intelligence and discrimination, the spiritual intelligences displayed (their retributive power ').
‘Therefore even the Son of Heaven must have some whom he honours; that is, he has his uncles of his surname. He must have some to whom he concedes the precedence ; that is, he has his cousins, who bear the same surname, and are older than himself. In the ancestral temple he manifests the utmost reverence, showing that he does not forget his parents; he cultivates his person and is careful of his conduct, fearing lest he should disgrace his predecessors.
‘When in the ancestral temple he exhibits the
In the ancestral temple he manifests the utmost reverence, showing that he does not forget his parents; he cultivates his person and is careful of his conduct, fearing lest he should disgrace his predecessors.
‘When in the ancestral temple he exhibits the a dual Power, taking the place of Heaven or God. We can in a degree follow the treatise in transferring the reverence paid by a son to his father to loyalty shown by him to his ruler; but it is more djfficult to understand the development of filial piety into religion that is here assumed and described. Was it not the pressing of this virtue too far, the making more of it than can be made, that tended to deprave religion during the Kau dynasty, and to mingle with the earlier monotheism a form of nature-worship ?
Hsing Ping, in his ‘Correct Meaning,’ makes the ‘discrimination’ here to be ‘an ability to distinguish the advantages of the earth ;’— showing how he had the sixth and seventh chapters in his mind.
1 «The Spiritual Intelligences’ here are Heaven and Earth conceived of as Spiritual Beings. They responded to the sincere service of the intelligent kings, as Hsing Ping says, with ‘the harmony of the active and passive principles of nature, seasonable winds and rain, the absence of epidemic sickness and plague, and the repose of all under heaven.’ Compare with this what is said in ‘the Great Plan’ of the Sha, pp. 147, 148.
p. 486
utmost reverence, the spirits of the departed manifest themselves?. Perfect filial piety and fraternal duty reach to (and move) the spiritual intelligences, and diffuse their light on all within the four seas ;— they penetrate everywhere.
‘It is said in the Book of Poetry ?, “ From the west to the east,
From the south to the north,
There was not a thought but did him homage.”’
CuapreR XVII. Tue Service oF THE RULER.
The Master said, ‘The superior man ® serves his ruler in such a way, that when at court in his presence his thought is how to discharge his loyal duty to the utmost; and when.he retires from it, his thought is how to amend his errors. He carries out with deference the measures springing from his excellent qualities, and rectifies him (only) to save him from what are evil. Hence, as the superior and inferior, they are able to have an affection for each other.
‘It is said in the Book of Poetry ‘,
“In my heart I love him; And why should I not say so? In the core of my heart I keep him, And never will forget him.’’’
1 The reader will have noticed many instances of this, or what were intended to be instances of it, in the translations from the Shih, pp. 365-368, &c.
2 See the Shih, III, i, ode 10, stanza 6.
* “The superior man’ here can only be the good and intelligent officer in the royal domain or at a feudal court.
* See the Shih, II, viii, ode 4, stanza 4.
p. 487
CuapTer XVIII. ’ FirtaL Piety 1n MourninG FoR PARENTS.
2 See the Shih, III, i, ode 10, stanza 6.
* “The superior man’ here can only be the good and intelligent officer in the royal domain or at a feudal court.
* See the Shih, II, viii, ode 4, stanza 4.
p. 487
CuapTer XVIII. ’ FirtaL Piety 1n MourninG FoR PARENTS.
The Master said, ‘When a filial son is mourning for a parent, he wails, but not with a prolonged sobbing ; in the movements of ceremony he pays no attention to his appearance ; his words are without elegance of phrase; he cannot bear to wear fine clothes ; when he hears music, he feels no delight; when he eats a delicacy, he is not conscious of its flavour :—such is the nature of grief and sorrow.
‘After three days he may partake of food; for thus the people are taught that the living should not be injured on account of the dead, and that emaciation must not be carried to the extinction of life :—such is the rule of the sages. The period of mourning does not go beyond three years, to show the people that it must have an end.
‘An inner and outer coffin are made; the graveclothes also are put on, and the shroud; and (the body) is lifted (into the coffin). The sacrificial vessels, round and square, are (regularly) set forth, and (the sight of them) fills (the mourners) with (fresh) distress': The women beat their breasts, and the men stamp with their feet, wailing and weeping, while they sorrowfully escort the coffin to the grave. They consult the tortoise-shell to determine the grave and the ground about it, and
1 These vessels were arranged every day by the coffin, while it continued in the house, after the corpse was put into it. The practice was a serving of the dead as the living had been served. It is not thought necessary to give any details as to the other different rites of mourning which are mentioned. They will be found, with others, in the translations from the Lf AT.
488. THE HSIAO KING. CH. XVIII, there they lay the body in peace. They prepare the ancestral temple (to receive the tablet of the departed), and there present offerings to the disem- ‘bodied spirit. In spring and autumn they offer sacrifices, thinking of the deceased as the seasons come round.
‘The services of love and reverence to parents when alive, and those of grief and sorrow to them when dead :—these completely discharge the fundamental duty of living men. The righteous claims of life and death are all satisfied, and the filial son’s service of his parents is completed.’
‘The services of love and reverence to parents when alive, and those of grief and sorrow to them when dead :—these completely discharge the fundamental duty of living men. The righteous claims of life and death are all satisfied, and the filial son’s service of his parents is completed.’
The above is the Classic of Filial Piety, as published by the emperor Hsiian in a.p. 722, with the headings then prefixed to the eighteen chapters. Subsequently, in the eleventh century, Sze-m& Kwang (a.p. 1009-1086), a famous statesman and historian, published what he thought was the more ancient text of the Classic in twenty-two chapters, with ‘Explanations’ by himself, without indicating, however, the different chapters, and of course without headings to them. This work is commonly published along with an ‘Exposition’ of his views, by Fan 3-yii, one of his contemporaries and friends. The differences between his text and that of the Thang emperor are insignificant. He gives, however, one additional chapter, which would be the nineteenth of his arrangement. It is as follows :—*‘ Inside the smaller doors leading to the inner apartments are to be found all the rules (of government). There is awe for the father, and also for the elder brother. Wife and children, servants and concubines are like the common people, serfs, and underlings.’
(r)
Kk
TRANSLITERATION OF ORIENTAL ALPHABETS ADOPTED FOR THE TRANSLATIONS OF THE SacrED Books oF THE East.
A Greek-English Lexicon, by Henry George Liddell, D.D., and Robert Scott, D.D. Sixth Edition, Revised and Augmented. 1870. 4to. cloth, 11. 16s.
(See also Clarendon Press Series pp. 21, 24.)
A Greek-English Lexicon, by Henry George Liddell, D.D., and Robert Scott, D.D. Sixth Edition, Revised and Augmented. 1870. 4to. cloth, 11. 16s.
A Greek-English Lexicon, abridged from the above, chiefly for the use of Schools. Lighteenth Edition. Carefully Revised throughout. 1879. Square 12mo. cloth, 7s, 6d.
A copious Greek-English Vocabulary, compiled from the best authorities. 1850. a4mo. bound, 33.
Graecae Grammaticae Rudimenta in usum Scholarum. Auctore Carolo Wordsworth, D.C.L. Nineteenth Edition, 1877. 12mo. cloth, 4s.
A Greek Primer, for the use of beginners in that Language. By the Right Rev. Charles Wordsworth, D.C.L., Bishop of St. Andrews. Sixth Edition, Revised and Enlarged. Extra fcap. 8vo. cloth, 1s. 6d.
A Practical Introduction to Greek Acoentuation, by H. W. Chandler, M.A. 1862. 8vo. cloth, 10s. 6d.
Etymologicon Magnum. Ad Codd. MSS. recensuit et notis variorum instruxit Thomas Gaisford, S.T.P. 1848. fol. clotb, 11. 148.
Suidae Lexicon. Ad Codd. MSS. recensuit Thomas Gaisford, S.T.P. Tomi III. 1834. fol. cloth, 2l. as.
Scheller’s Lexicon of the Latin Tongue, with the German explanations translated into English by J. E. Riddle, M.A, 1835. fol.
cloth, 11. 18, [2] B
2 Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Scriptores Rei Metricae. Edidit Thomas Gaisford, 8.T.P. Tomi III. 8vo. cloth, 158. Sold separately: Hephaestion, Terentianus Maurus, Proclus, cum annotationibus, etc. Tomi II. 10s. Scriptores Latini. 5s.
The Book of Hebrew Roots, by Abu ’L-Walid Marwan ibn Jan&h. otherwise called Rabbi Yonah. Now first edited, with an Appendix, by Ad. Neubauer. 4to. cloth, al. 78. 6d.
A Treatise on the use of the Tenses in Hebrew. By S. R. Driver, M.A. Extra feap. 8vo. cloth, 6s. 6d.
A Practical Grammar of the Sanskrit Language, arranged with reference to the Classical Languages of Europe, for the use of English Students, by Monier Williams, M.A. Fourth Edition, 1877. 8vo. cloth, 158.
A Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Etymologically and Philologically arranged, with special reference to Greek, Latin, German, Anglo-Saxon, English, and other cognate Indo-European Languages. By Monier Williams, M.A., Boden Professor of Sanskrit. 1872. 4to. cloth, 4]. 148. 6d.
Nalopdékhyd4nam. Story of Nala, an Episode of the Mahé-
* Bhérata: the Sanskrit text, with a copious Vocabulary, and an improved version of Dean Milman’s Translation. By Monier Williams, M.A. Second Edition, Enlarged and Improved. 8vo. cloth, 158.
Sakuntala. A Sanskrit Drama, in seven Acts. Edited by Monier Williams, M.A. Second Edition, 8vo. cloth, 218.
An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary, by Joseph Bosworth, D.D., Professor of Anglo-Saxon, Oxford. New edition. In the Press.
Second Edition, Enlarged and Improved. 8vo. cloth, 158.
Sakuntala. A Sanskrit Drama, in seven Acts. Edited by Monier Williams, M.A. Second Edition, 8vo. cloth, 218.
An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary, by Joseph Bosworth, D.D., Professor of Anglo-Saxon, Oxford. New edition. In the Press.
An Iocelandic-English Dictionary. Based on the MS. collections of the late Richard Cleasby. Enlarged and completed by G. Vigfisson. With an Introduction, and Life of Richard Cleasby, by G. Webbe Dasent, D.C.L. 4to. cloth, 31. 7s.
A List of English Words the Etymology of which is illustrated by comparison with Icelandic. Prepared in the form of an APPENDIX to the above. By W. W. Skeat, M.A., stitched, 2s.
A Handbook of the Chinese Language. Parts I and II, Grammar and Chrestomathy. By James Summers. 1863. 8vo. half bound, 11, 8s.
Cornish Drama (The Ancient). Edited and translated by E. Norris, Esq., with a Sketch of Cornish Grammar, an Ancient Cornish Vocabulary, etc. 2 vols. 1859. 8vo. cloth, 11. 18.
The Sketch of Cornish Grammar separately, stitched, 2s, 6d.
Clarendon Press, Oxford. 3
An Htymological Dictionary of the Language, arranged on an Historical Basis. By W. W. Skeat, M.A., Elrington and Bosworth Professor of Anglo-Saxon in the University of Cambridge. To be completed in Four Parts. Part I, containing A—D. 4to. ros. Just Published.
GREEK CLASSICS, &c.
Aeschylus: quae supersunt in Codice Laurentiano typis descripta. Edidit R. Merkel. 1861. Small folio, cloth, rl. 18.
Aeschylus: Tragoediae et Fragmenta, ex recensione Guil. Dindorfii, Second Edition, 1851. 8vo. cloth, 8s. 6d.
Aeschylus: Annotationes Guil. Dindorfii. Partes II. 1841. 8vo. cloth, 108.
Aeschylus: Scholia Graeca, ex Codicibus aucta et emendata a Guil. Dindorfio. 1851. 8vo, cloth, 5s.
Sophocles: Tragoediae et Fragmenta, ex recensione et cum commentariis Guil. Dindorfii. Third Edition, a vols. 1860. fcap. 8vo. cloth, tl. 18.
Each Play separately, limp, as. 6d. The Text alone, printed on writing paper, with large margin, royal 16mo. closb, 8s. The Text alone, square 16mo. cloth, 35. 6d. Each Play separately, limp, 6d. (See also p. 26.)
Sophocles: Tragoediae et Fragmenta cum Annotatt. Guil.
Dindorfii. TomillI. 1849. 8vo. cloth, 10s. The Text, Vol. I. 5s. 6d. The Notes, Vol.II. 4s. 6d.
Sophocles: Scholia Graeca : Vol. I. ed. P. Elmsley, A.M. 1828. 8vo. cloth, 4s. 6d. Vol. II. ed. Guil. Dindorfius. 1852. 8vo. cloth, 4s. 6d.
Eyripides: Tragoediae et Fragmenta, ex recensione Guil. Dinaren Tomi If. 1834. 8vo, clotb, los.
Euripides: Annotationes Guil. Dindorfii. Partes II. 1840. 8vo. cloth, 108, ‘
Euripides: Scholia Graeca, ex Codicibus aucta et emendata a Guil. Dindorfio. TomilV, 1863. 8vo. closb, 11. 16s.