← The source library
Christian mysticism · from the Internet Archive

Meister Eckhart — Franz Pfeiffer, trans. C. de B. Evans (1924)

Preserved in the archive of the housea source of Meister Eckhart

Ave, gratia plena, dominus tecum! (Luc. 1,3). ‘Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee! The Holy Ghost shall descend into thee from above, from the lofty light-throne of the eternal Father.’ Here there are three things to be understood. First, the radiant nature of the angel; secondly, that he knew himself unworthy to behold God’s mother; thirdly, that he was speaking not alone to her but to a goodly multitude, to every virtuous soul desiring God.

I say: had Mary not borne God in ghostly fashion first, he never had been born of her in flesh. The woman said to Christ, ‘ Blessed is the womb which bare thee.’ To which Christ replied, * Blessed not alone the womb which bare me : blessed are they that hear the word of God and keep it.” It is more worth to God his being brought forth ghostly in the individual virgin or good soul than that he was born of Mary bodily.

This involves the notion of our being the only Son whom the Father has eternally begotten. When the Father begat all creatures he was begetting me; I flowed out with all creatures while remaining within in the Father. Like what I am now saying ;

», 222 Meister Eckhart

ye

it springs up within me, then I pause in the idea, and thirdly I speak it out, and all of you receive it: but really it is in me all the while. So am I abiding in the Father. In the Father is the ‘exemplar of all creatures. This exalted nature has its intellectual prototype in God. And not merely intellectual but intellect “itself. The best God ever did for man was to be man himself. I will tell you a story to illustrate my point. Once upon a time there was a rich man and his wife. The lady by mischance did lose an eye whereat she grieved excessively. Then came her lord to her and said, ‘O wife, why so distressed?’ Quoth she, ‘My lord, ’tis not my eye I mourne; I mourne for fear lest you should love me less.’—‘ Nay wife, I love thee,’ he replied. After- wards, not over long, he put out one of his own eyes, and going to his wife he said, ‘ Lady, so you may know I love you I have made myself like you: now I too have only one eye.’ According to the philosophers, creatures are all striving to

'n@® bring forth and emulate the Father. Another doctor says that

every active cause works solely for the sake of its result, to find

_# =rest_and. peace in.its-end: This is mankind, who scarce could

credit God’s great love for him till God did put out one of his own eyes by taking human nature. This was made flesh. Said our Lady, ‘ How shall this be?’ The angel replied, ‘ The Holy Ghost shall come down into thee from on high, from the lofty throne of the Father of eternal light.’ In principio. Unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given.’ Child in his frail humanity, Son in his eternal deity. One philosopher declares

aoe s that creatures are all striving-after_their primitive. pure_nature,

u UM

ee

after their supreme. perfection. Fire as fire _does..not-burn : _it is too intangible, too pure to burn at all; it is the fire-nature which will burn, infusing into the dry wood its nature and its light according to its own most high perfection. God has done the same. He has made, the soul according to his own most perfect nature, pouring into her the whole of his own light in all its pristine purity, while he himself remains all undefiled. Now you must know that I lately said: When God created all

be creatures he had surely gotten first something uncreated setting _}forth the general idea of creatures: to wit, the spark, which is

‘so nearly God that it is a single, impartible one, bearing the ‘form of all creatures, formless and above form.

Yesterday in the schools there was a theological discussion. I said I was astonished at no one being able to give the solution of my question: If I am the only Son whom the Father has eternally. begotten, have I eternally been Son? I say, yea and nay. Son,

yes, inasmuch as the Father has eternally begotten me; not Son in my unbegotten nature. In principio. We are given to

Sermons and Collations — 223

understand ‚that“we are\the only Son whom the Father has been bringing forth for aye out of his arcane understanding of the eternal mystery of the first beginning of his primitive light-nature which is the end of all perfection. There I have been at rest for aye, asleep in the dormant understanding of the eternal Father, -immanent,-unspoken. I trow, seen in that light, any bit of stick would be an angel and would be intelligent, and not alone intel- ligent : it would be pure intellect in that first pure nature which is the perfection of enlightenment. Out of his light-nature he has been eternally begetting.me.his one begotten Son in the express image of his eternal Fatherhood to the end that I may be the Father and beget him of whom.Iam begotten. Like one who stands before some lofty peak hailing, ‘Art there?’ And echo answers back, ‘ Art there?’ He cries, ‘Come forth! ’—‘ Come forth!’ the voice replies. This is what God does: he begets his Son into the summit of the soul. By the fact of his bearing his Son into me I bear him back into the Father. It was nothing else, God’s virgin birth, than his getting his Son back again.

I used to wonder (it is many years ago) whether I should be asked why one blade of grass is so unlike another; and as it happened I was asked why they are so different. I said, it is more marvellous they are so much alike. One philosopher says that the blades of grass are all different owing to the superfluity of the goodness of God which he pours out abundantly into all crea- tures the more to show his majesty. I said it is more wonderful how much the grass-blades are alike, explaining that just as all the angels are the same in their original pure nature so all the

' grasses are the same and all things are identical.

I was thinking as I came along that one might here in time succeed in mastering God. Supposing I were up on high and told him, ‘Come up hither,’ that would be difficult. But if I said, ‘ Bide down below,’ that would be very easy. That is what God does. If aman is lowly God is unable to withhold his goodness ; he is obliged to sink himself, to pour himself, into that lowly soul, on the lowest of the lowly bestowing himself most of all and bestowing himself wholly. What God bestows is his nature, and his nature is his goodness and his goodness is his love. All joy and sorrow come from love.

I was thinking on the way as I was walking here, I should not have come were I not prepared to get wet for friendship’s sake. If you have all got wet let me get wet too. Good and ill both come from love. Man should not be afraid of God. Some fear is harmful. The right sort of fear.is the fear.of losing God. It behoves man to love God since God loves man consummately. The masters say that all things are in travail, labouring to beget

224 Meister Eckhart

themselves in the image of the Father. They talk of earth as “fleeing from the heavens ; of her fleeing down and reaching heaven downwards; of her escaping upwards to encounter the lowest of the heavens. Earth has no escape from heaven: flee she up or flee she down heaven still invades her, energising her, fructi- fying her whether for her weal or for her woe. God treats man the same: weening to escape him we run into his arms, for all corners are exposed to him. God will give birth to his Son in thee whether thou like it or loathe it ; whether thou sleepest or wakest God goes on with his work. That we have no sense of it is because our tongue is furred with the slime of creatures and possesses not the salt of divine affection. If we had godly love we should savour God and all the works God ever wrought and receive all things from God and be doing the same work as he does. In this sameness we are all his only Son. : [ God created the soul according to his own most perfect nature that she might be the bride of his only-begotten Son. He know- ing this full well decided to go forth out of the private chamber | of his eternal Fatherhood where he has slept for aye and be | proclaimed abroad while inwardly abiding in the first beginning of | his primitive light-nature. So lifting up the tent of his eternal _/ glory the Son proceeded out of the Most High to go and fetch his “, lady whom his Father had eternally given him to wife and restore her to her former high estate. For this reason he went forth and comes leaping like a love-impassioned swain. He came forth only to return again into his chamber, into the silent darkness of ; his mysterious Fatherhood. He proceeded out of the supreme _ in order to go in again accompanied by his bride and show her the \ hidden mystery of his secret Godhead, where he is at peace with “himself and with all creatures. 2

In principio signifies, in the beginning of all things. It also means the end of all things, since the first beginning is because of the last end. I trow that God himself is not at rest as being the first beginning : he is at rest where he is the end and cessation of existence, not that existence is then brought to naught: it is brought to its ultimate perfection. What is the last end? It is the mystery of the darkness of the eternal Godhead which is unknown and never has been known and never shall be known. Therein God abides to himself unknown, and the light of the eternal Father has been shining there for aye, and the darkness does not comprehend the light. May we find this truth, So help

us the truth whereof we speak. Amen.

Sermons and Collations 225

LXXXIX! 1. THE WORD OF GOD.

Christ said, ‘Blessed is the man who hears God’s Word and; | keeps it.’ The Father himself hears nothing, sees nothing, says

nothing, begets nothing excepting his own Word, and in this Word. , ; ‘ |

the Father sees and hears and brings forth himself, even_this

Word and all things, his godhood in principle and himself in nature : this. Word with the same nature in another Personi Observe his mode of speech. The Father, fructifying, brings forth his own nature all at once, as understanding, in his eternal Word; not at will nor as an act of will. That which is done or spoken by the power of his will he can in that same power refrain from if he will. Not so with the Father and his eternal Word ; whether he would or no he is obliged to speak his Word, to procreate unceas- ingly: this is rooted, so to say, in the Father-nature as deeply as the Father is himself. The Father speaks his Word then, willingly but not from will, naturally, not from nature. In this Word the Father speaks my and thy and every individual human

soul as this same Word. In this utterance thou and I are the.

natural Son of God like the Word itself. As I have already said, the Father knows nothing but this Word and himself and all divine nature and all things in this Word, and everything he knows therein is like the Word and is the Word itself in nature and in truth.

When the Father gives thee, reveals to thee, this gnosis, he is giving thee his life, his being and his deity, really and truly, all together. The human father shares his nature with his son but not his life or being. You can prove this by the fact that if the father dies the son may go on living or the son may die and the father go on living. With a common life and being they would live or die together. They are separate individuals as regards their life and being, and in this they differ from the heavenly Father and his Son. If I take a light from one place and put it in another these lights, as lights, are separate things, for one may go on burning while the other has gone out, and vice versa. Thus they are neither one nor yet eternal.